For many educators, the goal of programs for the gifted is “the education of identified gifted students.” This article argues that this goal makes gifted and talented (GT) programs vulnerable to discontinuation and relegates gifted children to inclusionary, regular classrooms where their needs are rarely met. To avoid these possibilities, the goal of GT should be reformulated to “the development of gifted young adults.” This goal has several advantages, including the possibility of a more enriched curriculum and a more diverse group of children with higher creative-productive potential. It also includes the overt recognition. that these children require both differentiated instruction and specialized guidance to acquire a measure of expertise, establish a strong sense of self, and make personally satisfying career choices. The Growing Giftedness model presented would have GT students work more closely with adults and with one another than the inclusionary model or part-time gifted programs can allow. In addition, this model adumnbrates the elements of a fill-time program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, T., & Karnes, F. A. (1994). Teacher preferences among the lower socioeconomic rural and suburban advantaged gifted students. Roeper Review, 17, 52-53.
2.
Allan, S. D. (1991). Ability-grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping the gifted?Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60-65.
3.
Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Zhang, W., & Emmons, C. L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
4.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
5.
Beecher, M. (1995). Developing the gifts and talents of all students in the regular classroom: An innovative curricular design based on the Enrichment Triad Model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning.
6.
Benito, Y. (1994). Definición, pautas de identificación, y educación para padres y profesores [Definition, methods of identification, and education for parents and teachers]. In Y. Benito (Ed.), Intervención e investigatión psicoeducativeas en alumnos superdotados [Psychoeducational intervention and research on gifted students] (pp. 79-93). Salamanca, Spain: Amarú.
7.
Bernal, E. M. (1986). Evaluation of programs for the gifted and talented. In J. Gallagher & R. Courtright (Eds.), World Council's annotated bibliography of gifted education (pp. 65-72). New York: Trillium.
8.
Bernal, E. M. (1990, June). The identification blues and how to cure them. California Association for the Gifted's Communicator, 20(3), 1-1, 27-27.
9.
Bernal, E. M. (1997, Spring/Summer). Some thoughts on the changing complexion of GT education: The demographic shift could revitalize the field. Baylor Educator, 22(1), 10-17.
10.
Bernal, E. M. (1998a, Winter). Could gifted English-language learners save gifted and talented programs in an age of reform and inclusion?Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 18(1), 11-14.
11.
Bernal, E. M. (1998b, February). Recruiting bilingual teachers for programs for the gifted and talented. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Bilingual Education, Dallas, TX.
12.
Bernal, E. M. (1999). Mundos Unidos/Connecting Worlds: A two-way bilingual immersion program for gifted students. Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 20(2), 4-5, 15-17.
13.
Bernal, E. M. (2000). The quintessential features of gifted education as seen from a multicultural perspective. In G. Esquivel & J. Houtz (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness in culturally diverse students (pp. 159-191). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
14.
Bernal, E. M. (2001a, June). Issues in the education of gifted students from non-dominant ethnic groups. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Institute on Creativity, Fordham University-Lincoln Center, New York.
15.
Bernal, E. M. (2001b,July). For the new millennium: A multicultural curriculum for all gifted students. Paper presented at the meeting of Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted, Irvine, CA.
16.
Bernal, E. M., & Jordán, A. (1999, December). Second year's evaluation report on Mundos Unidos/Connecting Worlds: Mesita School's two-way bilingual immersion gifted and talented program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Texas Association for Gifted and Talented, Houston.
17.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
18.
Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Callaghan, C. M. (1996). A critical self-study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil, or sedition?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148-163.
Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
22.
Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2000). Dissociation and integration of talent development and personal growth: Comments and suggestions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 247-251.
23.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research in multicultural education (pp. 465-483). New York: Macmillan.
24.
Delisle, J. R. (1995). Searching for the soul of gifted child education. Gifted Child Today, 18(4), 10-10, 42-42.
25.
Esquivel, G. B., & Nahari, S. G. (2000). Culturally diverse gifted students: A historical perspective. In G. Esquivel & J. Houtz (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness in culturally diverse students (pp. 29-43). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
26.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1989, March). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 6-11.
27.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Talent development as an alternative to gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 5-9.
28.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). How to identify and develop special talents. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 66-69.
29.
Feldhusen, J. F. (2001). Talent development in gifted education. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education Digest, E610 (EDO-EC-01-5).
30.
Feldhusen, J. G., & Wood, B. K. (1997). Developing growth plans for gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 20(6), 24-28.
31.
Feldman, D. (1979). The mysterious case of extreme giftedness. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. The 78th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago.
32.
Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Harris, J. J., III (1997). The recruitment and retention of minority teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 19, 213-220.
33.
Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18, 103-111.
34.
Gallagher, J. J. (1997, July/August). Educating gifted students in the 21st century. Invited address to the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Seattle, WA.
35.
Gentry, M. (1996, Spring). Total school cluster grouping: An investigation of achievement and identification of elementary school students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 8-11.
36.
Guilford, J. P. (1964, January). Creative thinking and problem solving. California Teachers Association Journal, 9-10.
37.
Hechinger, F. M. (1985, February 12). How talent can be nurtured. The New York Times, p. C11-C11.
38.
Hillman, J. (1996). The soul's code: In search of character and calling. New York: Random House.
39.
Hoge, R. D. (1988, October). Issues in the definition and measurement of the giftedness construct. Educational Researcher, 12-16, 22-22.
40.
Johnsen, S. (1991). Excellence in the education of teachers of the gifted and talented. Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 11(4), 6-7, 12-12.
41.
Johnsen, S. (1999). Distinguished achievement programs: What does research say?Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 19(1), 1-1, 27-30.
42.
Kauffman, J. M. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education for the hard-to-teach. Journal of Special Education, 23, 256-278.
43.
Maker, C. J. (1975). Training teachers for the gifted and talented: A comparison of models. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
44.
Milgram, R. M. (1984). Creativity in gifted adolescents: A review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1, 25-42.
45.
Oakes, J. (1988, January). Tracking: Can schools take a different route?National Education Association Journal, 41-47.
46.
Oakes, J. (1994). Tracking: Why schools need to take another route. In. B. Bigelow, L. Christensen, S. Karp, B. Minor, & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking our classrooms: Teaching for equity and justice (pp. 178-181). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
47.
Olenchak, F. R. (1999, Spring). Does one size ever fit all? A case for individualizing curricula for gifted and talented students. Understanding Our Gifted, 11(3), 18-23.
48.
Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202.
49.
Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
50.
Prince, E. (1999, January). If Rembrandt were alive today, he'd be dead. Our Gifted Children, 54, 12-16.
51.
Ray, J. (1997). The gifted student in the regular classroom: A survey. Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 17(4), 18-20.
52.
Reis, S. M. (1994, April). How schools are shortchanging the gifted. Technology Review, 38-45.
53.
Reis, S. M. (1995). What gifted education can offer the reform movement: Talent development. In J. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students (pp. 371-387). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
54.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978, November). What makes giftedness?Phi Delta Kappan, 180-184, 261-261.
55.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332-357). New York: Creative Learning.
56.
Renzulli, J. S. (1999). The role of authentic learning in developing gifts and talents: A how-to guide. Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 19(4), 5-7, 20-23.
57.
Rimm, S. B. (1995). Impact of family patterns upon the development of giftedness. In J. L. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C. L. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students (pp. 243-256). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
58.
Robinson, A. (1998). Cooperative learning, curriculum access, and the challenge of acceleration. Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented's Tempo, 18(1), 1-1, 6-7.
59.
Rogers, K. B. (2001). Re-forming gifted education. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
60.
Runco, M. A. (1993). Creativity as an educational objective for disadvantaged students (Creativity: Research-based Decision-making Series, Report No. 9306). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 363 074)
61.
San Antonio Gifted Education Foundation. (2001). Camino School concept. San Antonio, TX: SAGE Foundation.
62.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playingfavorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. New York: State University of New York.
63.
Schuler, P. A. (1997, Winter). Cluster grouping coast to coast. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 11-15.
64.
Silverman, L. K. (1995). Highly gifted children. In J. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students (pp. 217-240). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
65.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-8.
66.
Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Lies we live by: Misapplication of tests in identifying the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 157-161.
67.
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). What constitutes a “good” definition of giftedness?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 96-100.
68.
Subotnik, R. F. (1998, June/July). Special schools for talented children: Who should attend, when and why? Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Institute on Creativity and Gifted and Talented Learners, Fordham University-Lincoln Center, New York.
69.
Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1995). Viewing talent development longitudinally: An aid to policymaking. Educational Forum, 59, 372-380.
70.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). A proposed enrichment matrix for gifted children. In L. Kanevsky (Ed.), Issues in gifted education (pp. 17-42). San Diego, CA: San Diego City Schools, Gifted and Talented Education Program.
71.
Thorkildsen, T. A. (1994). Some ethnical implications of communal and competitive approaches to gifted education. Roeper Review, 17, 54-57.
72.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
73.
Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
Webb, J. T., & DeVries, A. R. (1998). Gifted parent groups: The SENG model. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology.
75.
Webb, J. T., Meckstroth, E., & Tolan, S. S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child: A practical source for parents and teachers. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
76.
Winebrenner, S., & Devlin, B. (1998). Cluster grouping of gifted students: How to provide full time services on a part-time budget. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(3), 62-65.
77.
Yakova, M. G. (1994). Influencia del pequeño grupo social para el desarrollo de los niños superdotados [The influence of the small social group on the development of gifted children]. In Y. Benito M. (Ed.), Intervención e investigación psicoeducativeas en alumnos superdotados [Psychoeducational intervention and research on gifted students] (pp. 161-164). Salamanca, Spain: Amarú.
