The purpose of this study was to examine whether gifted achievers and gifted underachievers differ in their general academic self-perceptions, attitudes toward school, attitudes toward teachers, motivation and self-regulation, and goal valuation. The sample consisted of 56 gifted underachievers and 122 gifted achievers from 28 high schools nationwide. Gifted achievers and gifted underachievers differed in their attitudes toward school, attitudes toward teachers, motivation/self-regulation, and goal valuation, but not their academic self-perceptions. In addition, the logistic regression analysis correctly classified over 81% of the sample as either gifted achievers or gifted underachievers using their motivation/self-regulation and goal valuation self-ratings. This study represents an important step toward quantifying factors related to the underachieviement of gifted adolescents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91, 409-421.
2.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
5.
Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: Guilford Press.
6.
Borkowski, J. G., & Thorpe, P. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation: A life-span perspective on underachievement. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 45-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Bricklin B., & Bricklin, P. M. (1967). Bright child-poor grades: The psychology of underachievement. New York: Delacorte.
8.
Bruns, J. H. (1992). They can but they don't. New York: Viking Penguin.
9.
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
Cizek, G. J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1999). An introduction to logistic regression. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Human Development, 31, 223-245.
11.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Diaz, E. I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 105-122.
13.
Dowdall, C. B., & Colangelo, N. (1982). Underachieving gifted students: Review and implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 179-184.
14.
Fine, M. J., & Pitts, R. (1980). Intervention with underachieving gifted children: Rationale and strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 51-55.
15.
Fink, M. B. (1965). Objectification of data used in underachievement self-concept study. In M. Kornrich (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 79-86). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
16.
Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students. New York: Teacher's College Press.
17.
Frankel, E. (1965). A comparative study of achieving and underachieveing boys of high intellectual ability. In M. Kornrich (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 87-101). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
18.
Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 55-122). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Heacox, D. (1991). Up from underachievement. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
21.
Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465.
22.
Holland, V. (1998). Underachieving boys: Problems and solutions. Support for Learning, 13, 174-178.
23.
Kanoy, R. C., Johnson, B. W., & Kanoy, K. W. (1980). Locus of control and self-concept in achieving and underachieving bright elementary students. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 395-399.
24.
Lupart, J. L., & Pyryt, M. C. (1996). “Hidden gifted” students: Underachiever prevalence and profile. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 36-53.
25.
Lyon, M. A. (1993). Academic self-concept and its relationship to achievement in a sample of junior high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 201-211.
26.
Majoribanks, K. (1992). The predictive validity of attitudes towards school scale in relation to children's academic achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 945-949.
27.
Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement. New York: Wiley.
28.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
29.
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
30.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567-590.
31.
McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults?Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
McCoach, D. B. (2000). The school attitude assessment survey-Revised (SAAS-R). Unpublished instrument.
33.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (in press). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised (SAAS-R). Educational And Psychological Measurement.
34.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2001). A comparison of high achievers' and low achievers' attitudes, perceptions, and motivations. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5, 71-76.
35.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Moon, S. M., & Hall, A. S. (1998). Family therapy with intellectually and creatively gifted children. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 59-80.
37.
Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 399-406.
38.
Peters, W. A. M., Grager-Loidl, H., & Supplee, P. (2000). Underachievement in gifted and talented students: Theory and practice. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 609-620). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
41.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.
42.
Rimm, S. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown Trade.
43.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
44.
Schneider, S. (1998, Fall). Overcoming underachievement. Bulletin of the Pennsylvania Association of Gifted Education, 1-7.
45.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
46.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
47.
Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever. New York: Teacher's College Press.
48.
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
49.
Weiner, I. B. (1992). Psychological disturbance in adolescence (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
50.
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allen and Bacon.
51.
Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children's achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233-262.
53.
Wolfle, J. A. (1991). Underachieving gifted males: Are we missing the boat?Roeper Review, 13, 181-184.
54.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
