In this study, we examined gender differences in course enrollment patterns, reasons for course choice, and enjoyment of course. Participants consisted of 804 academically talented students (433 females, 371 males) attending a summer program. Data were self-reported and were collected on a program evaluation questionnaire. Males enrolled in traditionally male (TM) courses in significantly greater numbers than they enrolled in traditionally female (TF) courses, but female enrollment in the two types of courses was more equal. Asian American students' course enrollmnent in TM and TF courses was more balanced than non-Asian American student enrollment, and Asian American students endorsed fewer internal reasons than non-Asian students did. Students in TM classes endorsed more external reasons for course choice than their colleagues in TF classes. Finally, students who gave more internal reasons for course choice reported enjoying classes more than students who gave more external reasons. No gender differences in motivation were found.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brooks, L., Holahan, W., & Galligan, M. (1985). The effects of a nontraditional role-modeling intervention on sex-typing of occupational preference and career salience in adolescent females. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 264-276.
2.
Dukes, R. L., & Martinez, R. (1994). The impact of ethgender on self-esteem among adolescents. Adolescence, 29, 105-115.
3.
Dunnell, P. A., & Bakken, L. (1991). Gifted high school students' attitudes toward careers and sex roles. Roeper Review, 13, 198-201.
4.
Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (1981). Sex differences in mathematics: Results from national assessment. Math Teacher, 74, 554-559.
5.
Goldstein, D., & Stocking, V. B. (1994). TIP studies of gender differences in talented adolescents. In K. A. Heller & E. A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and responsibility: The third European conference of the European Council for High Ability held in Munich (Germany), October 11-14, 1992, (Vol. 2; pp. 190-203). Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.
6.
Harvey, T. J. (1984). Gender differences in subject preference and perception of subject importance among third-year secondary school pupils in single-sex and mixed comprehensive schools. Educational Studies, 10, 243-253.
7.
Hashizume, L., & Crozier, S. D. (1994). A female definition of career achievement. In J. Gallivan, S. D. Crozier, & V. M. Lalande (Eds.), Women, girls, and achievement (pp. 106-120). Ontario, Canada: Captus Press.
8.
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
9.
Kelly, A. (1988). Choice for girls and boys. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 5-23.
10.
Lapan, R. T., & Jingeleski, J. (1992). Circumscribing vocational aspirations in junior high school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 81-90.
11.
Lawrie, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Sex stereotypes, school subject preferences, and career aspirations as a function of single/mixed-sex schooling and presence/absence of an opposite sex sibling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 132-138.
12.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992) Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
13.
McTeer, J. H. (1986). Gender differences in relationship to likes and dislikes of four subject areas. The High School Journal, 69, 260-263.
14.
Murray, B. (1996, November). Self-esteem varies among ethnic-minority girls. APA Monitor, 42-42.
15.
Pedro, J. D., Wolleat, P., Fennema, E., & Becker, A. D. (1981). Election of high school mathematics by females and males: Attributions and attitudes. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 207-218.
16.
Pell, A. W. (1985). Enjoyment and attainment in secondary school physics. British Educational Research Journal, 11, 123-132.
17.
Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83-89.
18.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
19.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
20.
Sosniak, L. (1999). An everyday curriculum for the development of talent. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 166-172.
21.
Stables, A., & Stables, S. (1995). Gender differences in students' approaches to A-level subject choices and perceptions of A-level subjects: A study of first-year A-level students in a tertiary college. Educational Research, 37, 39-51.
22.
Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Course selection and performance of very high ability students: Is there a gender gap?Roeper Review, 15, 48-51.
23.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
24.
Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245-276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Weinstein, R. S. (1989). Classroom perception and student motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Volume 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 187-221). San Diego: Academic Press.
26.
Whang, P. A., & Hancock, G. R. (1994). Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparisons between Asian-American and non-Asian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 302-322.
27.
Whitehead, J. M. (1994). Academically successful schoolgirls: A case of sex-transcendence. Research Papers in Education, 9, 53-80.
28.
Whitehead, J. M. (1996). Sex stereotypes, gender identity, and subject choice at A-level. Educational Research, 38, 147-160.
29.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
30.
Williams, J. E. (1994). Gender differences in high school students' efficacy-expectation/performance discrepancies across four subject matter domains. Psychology on the Schools, 31, 232-237.
31.
Wilson, J. S., Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1994). Gender differences in motivations for course selection: Academically talented students in an intensive summer program. Sex Roles, 31, 349-367.
32.
Witty, P. (1963). A study of pupils' interests, grades 9, 10, 11, 12. Education, 82, 169-174.
33.
Worrell, F. C. (in press). Global and domain-specific self-concepts in academically talented Asian American and White adolescents. Manuscript submitted for publication.
