The advent of a new millenium is an appropriate time to consider some “unthinkable thoughts,” those thoughts that make us so uncomfortable that most professionals prefer to ignore them. Yet, if progress is to be made, such challenges to our professional roles must be confronted. Four such ugly questions are considered for gifted education, together with suggested actions to cope with them.
1. Is there really such an entity as a gifted child?
2. Is there such an entity as gifted education?
3. Is there such an entity as special personnel preparation for teachers of gifted students?
4. Is the application of special services for gifted students sufficient in scope and intensity to make a difference in the classroom?
We should recognize that, however we choose to cope with these issues, our status quo, business as usual, is hardly a viable choice for the 21st century.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin, V. (1994). The seven plus story: Developing hidden talent among students in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 80-84.
2.
Borland, J. (1997). Evaluating gifted programs. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 253-266). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Bouchard, T., Jr., Lykken, D., McGue, M., Segal, N., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223-228.
4.
Bouchard, T., Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055-1059.
5.
Callahan, C. (1996). A critical self study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil, or sedition?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148-163.
6.
Coleman, M., Gallagher, J., & Foster, A. (1994). Updated report on state policies related to identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
7.
Council for Exceptional Children (1995). What every special educator must know: The international standards for the preparation and certification in special education teachers. Reston, VA: Author.
8.
Feldhusen, J. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 547-552). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Frasier, M. (1991). Disadvantaged and culturally diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 234-245.
10.
Frasier, M. (1997). Gifted minority students: Reframing approaches to their identification and education. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 498-515). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Gallagher, J. (1984). Unthinkable thoughts. The Exceptional Parent, 14 (5), 13-17.
12.
Gallagher, J. (1998, June). Accountability for gifted students. Phi Delta Kappan, 739-742.
13.
Gallagher, J., & Gallagher, S. (1994). Teaching the Gifted Child (4th ed.). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Gallagher, J., Harradine, C., & Coleman, M. (1997). Challenge or boredom: Gifted students' view on their schooling. Roeper Review, 19, 132-136.
15.
Gallagher, S., & Stepien, W. (in press). Curricula for problem-based learning. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina.
16.
Harrison, A., Coleman, M., & Howard, J. (1994). Personnel preparation: Academically gifted. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
17.
Klausner, R. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1997). Ability grouping. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 230-242). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164-180.
20.
Morelock, M., & Feldman, D. (1997). High-IQ children, extreme precocity, and savant syndrome. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 439-459). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1992). Detracking schools: Early lessons from the field. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 448-454.
23.
Parker, J. (1987). Standards for graduate programs in gifted education. Washington DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
24.
Parker, J. (1996). NAGC standards for personnel preparation in gifted education: A brief history. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 158-164.
25.
Patton, J. (1992). Assessment and identification of African-American learners with gifts and talents. Exceptional Children, 59, 150-159.
26.
Pendarvis, E., & Howley A. (1996). Playing fair: The possibilities of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 215-233.
27.
Plomin, R. (1997). Genetics and intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 67-74). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (1997). Giftedness from a multiple intelligences perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed., pp. 54-66). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Reis, S., & Renzulli,J. (1992). Using curriculum compacting to challenge the above-average. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 51-57.
30.
Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: New directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 136-154). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194-214.
32.
Sawyer, R. (1988). In defense of academic rigor. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 5-19.
33.
Shore, B., & Delcourt, M. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and the interface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 138-154.
34.
Shore, B., Cornell, D., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
35.
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets!Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25-38.
36.
Treffinger, D., & Feldhusen, J. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181-193.
37.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp.126-135). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
