We examine the role of export intensity and firm governance in promoting the renewable energy transition of Indian manufacturing firms. Firm-level analysis of renewable energy transition is carried out in reference to six manufacturing industries during 2010–2021. The panel Tobit model is used to estimate the impact of identified variables and other firm-specific controls on renewable energy use. Positive impact of export intensity on renewable energy use is found, with the exception of the hard-to-abate sectors. Alternate measures of firm governance and institutional and foreign investor participation yield mixed results across industries. The presence of cross-sectional dependence was also tested. Robustness checks using fixed effects with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors show a consistent sign and significance of export intensity in impacting renewable energy use in the selected industries.
AgrawalA., & RathB. P. (2023). Coal and electricity generation in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 58, 51–57.
2.
AmbecS., & BarlaP. (2002). A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3), 355–360.
3.
AmbecS., CohenM. A., ElgieS., & LanoieP. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22.
4.
AppiahM., AshrafS., TiwariA. K., GyamfiB. A., & OnifadeS. T. (2023). Does financialization enhance renewable energy development in Sub-Saharan African countries?Energy Economics, 125, 106898.
5.
BandyopadhyayA., & RejS. (2021). Can nuclear energy fuel an environmentally sustainable economic growth? Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 63065–63086.
6.
BelloraC., & FontagnéL. (2023). EU in search of a carbon border adjusted mechanism. Energy Economics, 123, 106673.
7.
BenlemlihM., LiY., & AssafC. (2022). Executive compensation and executive performance: Evidence from CEO inside debt. Energy Economics, 116, 106403.
8.
CavallaroC. M., PearceJ. M., & SidortsovR. (2018). Decarbonizing the boardroom? Aligning electric utility executive compensation with climate change incentives. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 153–162.
9.
ChakrabortyI. (2023). Uncovering heterogeneity in the relationship between competition, corporate governance and firm performance using quantile regression on Indian data. Asia and the Global Economy, 3, 100066.
10.
ChangL., Taghizadeh-HesaryF., & MohsinM. (2023). Role of mineral resources trade in renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 181, 113321.
11.
ChenX., HeJ., & QiaoL. (2022). Does environmental regulation affect the export competitiveness of Chinese firms?Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115199.
12.
ChengZ., KaiZ., & ZhuS. (2023). Does green finance regulation improve renewable energy utilization? Evidence from energy consumption efficiency. Renewable Energy, 208, 63–75.
13.
DasK. C., & MahalikM. K. (2023). Renewable energy use and export performance of manufacturing firms: Panel evidence from six industries in India. Energy Economics, 125, 106894.
14.
DasS. (2020). The national policy on biofuels of India—A perspective. Energy Policy, 143, 111595.
15.
DharS., PathakM., & ShuklaP. R. (2020). Transformation of India’s steel and cement industry in a sustainable 1.5°C world. Energy Policy, 137, 111104.
16.
DongW., LiY., GaoP., & SunY. (2023). Role of trade and green bond in renewable energy deployment in Southeast Asia. Renewable Energy, 204, 313–319.
17.
DoytchN., & NarayanS. (2016). Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption. Energy Economics, 54, 291–301.
18.
DriscollJ. C., & KraayA. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 549–560.
19.
DuanY., & JiangX. (2021). Pollution haven or pollution halo? A re-evaluation on the role of multinational enterprises in global CO₂ emission. Energy Economics, 97, 105181.
20.
DyckA., LinsK. V., RothL., & WagnerH. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131, 693–714.
21.
E-VahdatiS., Wan-HussinW. N., & AriffinM. S. M. (2022). Sustainability performance and board compensation in Japan and ASEAN-5 countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S189–S199.
22.
EickeL., & WekoS. (2022). Does green growth foster green policies? Value chain upgrading and feedback mechanisms on renewable energy policies. Energy Policy, 165, 112948.
23.
FanP., QianX., WangJ., & YamadaK. (2024). Does ownership structure influence carbon emission? Different roles of institutional investors. Journal of Climate Finance, 6, 100030.
24.
FarooqU., & DarA. B. (2024). What drives the demand for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in India? The role of financial development and geopolitical uncertainty. The Indian Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241299889
25.
GaoJ., & HanC. (2021). Does foreign equity matter for pollution? Firm-level evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 76, 205–214.
26.
GarsousG., & WorackS. (2022). Technological expertise as a driver of environmental technology diffusion through trade: Evidence from the wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 162, 112799.
27.
GiarettaE., & ChesiniG. (2021). The determinants of debt financing: The case of fintech start-ups. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6, 268–279.
GoldarB., & GoldarA. (2023). Impact of export intensity on energy intensity in manufacturing plants: Evidence from India. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32, 639–664.
30.
GreeneW. H. (Ed.). (2002). Limited dependent variable and duration models. In Econometric analysis (5th ed., Ch. 22, pp. 756–802). Prentice Hall.
31.
GreveH., LayJ., & NagreteA. (2023). How vulnerable are small firms to energy price increases? Evidence from Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 28, 89–109.
32.
HartikainenH., JärvenpääM., & RautiainenA. (2021). Sustainability in environmental remuneration: A missing link towards more sustainable firms?Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129224.
33.
HeL.-Y., & HuangG. (2023). Can importing improve energy efficiency? Theory and evidence from Chinese industrial firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 451–469.
34.
HermanK. S., & XiangJ. (2022). Channeled through trade: How foreign environmental regulations induce domestic renewable energy innovation. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102629.
35.
HidakaW., IkedaN., & InoueK. (2023). Does engagement by large asset managers enhance governance of target firms?Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101932.
36.
HuangY., AhmadM., & AliS. (2022). The impact of trade, environmental degradation, and governance on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from selected ASEAN countries. Renewable Energy, 197, 1144–1150.
37.
IkramA., LiZ. (F.), & MinorD. (2023). CSR-contingent executive compensation contracts. Journal of Banking and Finance, 151, 105655.
38.
IlechukwuN., & LahiriS. (2022). Renewable energy consumption and international trade. Energy Reports, 8, 10624–10629.
39.
JinC., MonfortA., ChenF., XiaN., & WuB. (2024). Institutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 200, 123129.
40.
KallummalM., GuptaA. K., & KhoslaS. (2025). Estimating carbon emission intensity of energy intensive firms: A firm level analyses. In KumarN. & RoyS. (Eds.), FDI, MSMEs, digitalization, and green industrialization: Challenges, opportunities and policy lessons for India. Springer.
41.
KhanK., SuC. W., RehmanA. U., & UllahR. (2022). Is technological innovation a driver of renewable energy?Technology in Society, 70, 102004.
42.
KhenissiM., HamrouniA., & FarhatN. B. (2022). Executive compensation indexed to corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Empirical evidence from France. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103213.
43.
KusumaR. T., HiremathR. B., RajeshP., KumarB., & RenukappaS. (2022). Sustainable transition towards biomass-based cement industry: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 163, 112503.
44.
KwakwaP. A. (2025). Decarbonizing the textiles and clothing industry in South Africa: The role of renewable energy. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-09-2024-0162
45.
LiangS., WangP., JiaC., & ZhuJ. (2023). Studying green financing, factor allocation efficiency, and regional productivity growth in renewable energy industries. Renewable Energy, 214, 130–139.
46.
LiuW., ZhangJ., JiM., & LuoY. (2024). Investigating the link between green finance, environmental orientation, and carbon neutrality: A panel study of the metal extraction sector. Resources Policy, 89, 104550.
47.
LuZ., GozgorG., MahalikM. K., PadhanH., & YanC. (2022). Welfare gains from international trade and renewable energy demand: Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Economics, 112, 106153.
48.
MichelsM., & MusshoffO. (2022). A Tobit regression model for the timing of smartphone adoption in agriculture. Heliyon, 8, e11272.
49.
MOSPI. (2023). Energy statistics India 2023. Government of India. Retrieved, 7May2024, from https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Energy_Statistics_2023/EnergyStatisticsIndia2023.pdf
50.
MungaiE., & NdirituS. W. (2023). Peeling the onion! What are the drivers and barriers to cleaner production? A case of the Kenyan manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135436.
51.
MurugasamyP., & MishraV. (2022). Energy efficiency versus consumption: An empirical investigation of Jevons’ paradox across sectors in India. The Indian Economic Journal, 70, 112–137.
OakH., & BansalS. (2022). Enhancing energy efficiency of Indian industries: Effectiveness of PAT scheme. Energy Economics, 113, 106220.
54.
PalK., MukhopadhyayJ. P., & BhagawanP. (2024). Does cap-and-trade scheme impact energy efficiency and firm value? Empirical evidence from India. Energy Economics, 134, 107581.
55.
PaltsevS., GurgelA., MorrisJ., ChenH., DeyS., & MarwahS. (2022). Economic analysis of the hard-to-abate sectors in India. Energy Economics, 112, 106149.
56.
PesaranM. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34, 1089–1117.
57.
PetrovichB., & KubliM. (2023). Energy communities for companies: Executives’ preferences for local and renewable energy procurement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, 113506.
58.
QiX., GuoY., GuoP., YaoX., & LiuX. (2022). Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? Evidence from Chinese renewable energy firms. Energy Policy, 164, 112909.
59.
RattiS., ArenaM., AzzoneG., & Dell’AgostinoL. (2023). Environmental claims and executive compensation plans: Is there a link? An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, 138434.
60.
RitchieH., & RoserM. (2020). India: CO₂ country profile. Our World in Data. Retrieved, 10February2024, from https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/india
61.
RitzR. A. (2022). Linking executive compensation to climate performance. California Management Review, 64(3), 124–140.
62.
SafiullahM., AlamM. S., & IslamM. S. (2022). Do all institutional investors care about corporate carbon emissions?Energy Economics, 115, 106376.
63.
SambasivamB., & XuY. (2023). Reducing solar PV curtailment through demand-side management and economic dispatch in Karnataka, India. Energy Policy, 172, 113334.
64.
SegarraA., & TeruelM. (2012). An appraisal of firm size distribution: Does sample size matter?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82, 314–328.
65.
ShahM. H., & XiaoZ. (2023). Internal pyramid structure, judicial efficiency, firm-level governance and dividend policy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 764–785.
66.
SuM., WangQ., LiR., & WangL. (2022). Per capita renewable energy consumption in 116 countries: The effects of urbanization, industrialization, GDP, aging, and trade openness. Energy, 254, 124289.
67.
SungB. (2019). Do government subsidies promote firm-level innovation? Evidence from the Korean renewable energy technology industry. Energy Policy, 132, 1333–1344.
68.
TopolovaP., & KhandelwalA. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009.
69.
TsangA., WangK. T., LiuS., & YuL. (2021). Incorporating corporate social responsibility criteria into executive compensation and firm innovation: International evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102070.
70.
UllahS., & NasimA. (2021). Do firm-level sustainability targets drive environmental innovation? Insights from BRICS economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 112754.
71.
UyerA., GergedA. M., KuzeyC., & KaramanA. S. (2024). Renewable energy use, slack financial resources, and board attributes: Does energy efficiency policy matter?Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4935–4957.
72.
UyarA., KuzeyC., & KaramanA. S. (2023). Does aggressive environmental, social, and governance engagement trigger firm risk? The moderating role of executive compensation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 398, 136542.
73.
WangC., ZhangS., UllahS., UllahR., & UllahF. (2021). Executive compensation and corporate performance of energy companies around the world. Energy Systems Review, 38, 100749.
74.
WangE., GozgorG., MahalikM. K., PatelG., & HuG. (2022). Effects of institutional quality and political risk on the renewable energy consumption in the OECD countries. Resources Policy, 79, 103041.
75.
Wolde-RufaelY., & Mulat-WeldemeskelE. (2022). The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO₂ emission in Latin America and Caribbean countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100412.
76.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
77.
WuZ., LinS., ChenT., LuoC., & XuH. (2023). Does effective corporate governance mitigate the negative effect of ESG controversies on firm value?Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1772–1793.
YangG., XieY., HuangX., & ChenH. (2024). Exporters’ environmental premium in a developing country: Firm-level evidence from China. Review of International Economics, 32, 778–813.
80.
ZhangD., ZhangZ., JiQ., LuceyB., & LiuJ. (2021). Board characteristics, external governance and the use of renewable energy: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 72, 101317.
ZhaoS., HeX., & FaxritdinovnaK. U. (2023). Do industrial structure changes matter in renewable energy development? Mediating role of green finance development. Renewable Energy, 214, 350–358.
83.
ZhongweiH., & LiuY. (2022). The role of eco-innovations, trade openness, and human capital in sustainable renewable energy consumption: Evidence using CS-ARDL approach. Renewable Energy, 201(Part 1), 131–140.
84.
ZhouA., & LiJ. (2022). How do trade liberalization and human capital affect renewable energy consumption? Evidence from the panel threshold model. Renewable Energy, 184, 332–342.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
