A number of developed as well as developing countries provide subsidies to domestic players, leading to overproduction and over-exploitation of natural resources, which pose a serious threat to environmental sustainability. The analysis in this article attempts to understand the role of government budgetary subsidies on the overall environmental performance index through panel data model estimation for a set of 74 countries over an 11-year period (2000–2010). The empirical findings confirm the theoretical prediction that subsidies lead to environmental degradation, which is of particular concern for developing countries.
AticiCemal. (2009). Pollution without subsidy? What is the environmental performance index overlooking?Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1903–1907.
2.
BlancI.FriotD.MargniM.JollietO. (2008). Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach. Sustainable Development, 16(4), 251–260.
3.
BruvollAnnegreteMedinHege. (2003). Factors behind the environmental Kuznets curve: A decomposition of the changes in air pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(1), 27–48.
4.
ChakrabortyDebashisMukherjeeSacchidananda. (2013). How do trade and investment flows affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from panel data. Environmental Development, 6, 34–47.
5.
ChangHa-Joon. (2001). Infant industry promotion in historical perspective—A rope to hang oneself or a ladder to climb with? Paper presented at the conference titled ‘Development Theory at the Threshold of the Twenty-first Century’, 28–29 August 2001, ECLAC, Santiago, Chile.
6.
ChowGregory C. (2007). China’s energy and environmental problems and policies. Working Paper, No. 152, Center for Economic Policy Studies, Princeton University, Princeton.
7.
ColeMatthew A.ElliottRobert J.R.ZhangJing. (2011). Growth, foreign direct investment and the environment: Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Regional Science, 51(1), 121–138.
8.
ColeMatthew A.RaynerA.J.BatesJ.M. (1997). The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401–416.
9.
CopelandBrian R.TaylorM. Scott. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71.
10.
CostantiniValeriaMonniSalvatore. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 867–880.
11.
EmersonJ.W.HsuA.LevyM.A.de SherbininA.MaraV.EstyD.C.JaitehM. (2012). 2012 environmental performance index and pilot trend environmental performance index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
12.
EstyD.C.LevyM.A.SrebotnjakT.de SherbininA. (2005). 2005 environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
HammondA.L.AdriaanseA.RodenburgE.BryantD.WoodwardR. (1995). Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
IMF. (2011a). Government finance statistics: Compilation guide for developing countries. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
17.
IMF. (2011b). International financial statistics yearbook 2011. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
18.
JorgensonAndrew K. (2004). Uneven processes and environmental degradation in the World-Economy. Human Ecology Review, 11(2), 103–117.
19.
KellyDavid. (2009). Subsidies to industry and the environment. Working Paper, No. 14999, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
20.
LópezRamónGalinatoGregmar I.IslamAsif. (2011). Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 180–198.
21.
MaitiS.AgrawalP.K. (2005). Environmental degradation in the context of growing urbanization: A focus on the metropolitan cities of India. Journal of Human Ecology, 17(4), 277–287.
22.
MericanY.YusopZ.NoorZ.M.HookL.S. (2007). Foreign direct investment and the pollution in five ASEAN nations. International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(2), 245–261.
23.
MukherjeeSacchidanandaChakrabortyDebashis. (2009). Environment, human development and economic growth: A contemporary analysis of Indian states. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 9(1), 20–49.
24.
MukherjeeSacchidanandaChakrabortyDebashis. (2010). Is environmental performance influenced by socio-economic and socio-political Factors? Cross-country empirical evidences. Sustainable Development. doi: 10.1002/sd.502
25.
MukherjeeSacchidanandaChakrabortyDebashis. (2013). Negative influence of fiscal subsidies on environment: Empirical evidence from cross-country estimation. Working Paper, No. 117, NIPFP, New Delhi.
26.
RobinSarahWolcottRobQuintelaCarlos E. (2003). Perverse subsidies and the implications for biodiversity: A review of recent findings and the status of policy reforms. Paper presented at the 5th World Parks Congress: Sustainable Finance Stream, September, Durban, South Africa.
27.
SahibzadaS.A. (1993). Urbanisation and environmental degradation in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 32(4), 639–647.
28.
SteenblikR.P. (1998). Previous multilateral efforts to discipline subsidies to natural resource based industries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
29.
SternDavid I.CommonMichael S.BarbierEdward B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151–1160.
30.
TempletPaul H. (2001). Defending the public domain: Pollution, subsidies and poverty. Working Paper, No. 12, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
31.
UIC-CMDA. (2003). The economic and environmental impacts of agricultural subsidies: A look at Mexico and other OECD countries. Report prepared on behalf of Instituto Nacional de Ecologia (INE), Mexico.
UNEP. (2008). Reforming energy subsidies: Opportunities to contribute to the climate change agenda. Geneva: Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, UNEP.
36.
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) (undated), Environmental Performance Index” http://epi.yale.edu/ (accessed 7 July 2013).
37.
Van BeersC.Van den BerghJ.C.J.M. (2001). Perseverance of perverse subsidies and their impact on trade and environment. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 475–486.
38.
VictorDavid. (2009). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies. Winnipeg: Global Subsidy Initiative and International Institute of Sustainable Development.
