This article outlines how Dante’s philosophy and theology turn on issues that are being debated in broader philosophical, theological, and theoretical milieus today. It emphasizes, in particular, how the new horizon opened by certain postmodern—and more specifically post-secular—turns in philosophy shifts the light falling on the interface between the concepts of transcendence and immanence. As a result, Dante’s attempt, in the twilight of the Middle Ages, to renegotiate the relations between the two shows up as acutely relevant and potentially groundbreaking for current philosophical and theological inquiry. The areas of inquiry traversed include realized eschatology as theorized by Agamben; Foucault’s archeological model of knowledge; Patristic and medieval hexameral exegesis; the tension between hermeneutics and deconstruction; political theology; the theological turn in phenomenology; secularism and humanities as crypto-theological forms of thought. All are examined as prefigured in embryo by Dante’s comprehensive, poetic approach to knowing.
Agamben G (2000) Il tempo che resta: Un commento alla lettera ai Romani. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri. (Trans. P Dailey (2005) The Time that Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
2.
Agamben G (2009) “La chiesa e il regno,” Lectio pronunciata presso la cattedrale di Notre-Dame a Parigi l’8.3.2009. La chiesa e il regno. Rome: Nottetempo.
3.
ArdizzoneML (2016) Reading as the Angels Read: Speculation and Politics in Dante’s Banquet, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
ArianiM (2010) Lux inaccessibilis: Metafore e teologia della luce nel Paradiso di Dante, Rome: Aracne.
5.
Auerbach E (1959 [1944]) Figura. In: Auerbach E Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press pp. 9–71.
6.
Badiou A (1997) Saint Paul: La fondation de l’universalisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Trans. R Brassier (2003) Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
7.
Barnes JC and Petrie J (eds) (2007) Dante and the Human Body: Eight Essays. Dublin: Four Courts Press.
8.
Camilletti, Fabio (2019) The Portrait of Beatrice: Dante, D. G. Rosetti, and the Imaginary Lady. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
9.
CaputoJD (2006) The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
CestaroGP (2003) Dante and the Grammar of the Nursing Body, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
CritchleyS (2012) The Faith of the Faithless: Experiments in Political Theology, London: Verso.
De Vries H (1989) Theologie im Pianissimo & zwischen Rationalität und Dekonstruktion: Die Aktualität der Denkfiguren Adornos und Levinas. Kampen: J. H. Kok. (Trans. G Hale (2005) Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
14.
DeleuzeG (1969) Logique du sens, Paris: Minuit.
15.
Deleuze G (1995) “L’immanence: Une vie ...”. Philosophie 47: 3--7.
16.
Dickinson C (ed.) (2013) Postmodern Saints of France: Reconfiguring ‘the Holy’ in Contemporary French Philosophy. New York: T&T Clark.
17.
Foucault M (1969) L’archéologie du savoir, Paris: Gallimard.
18.
Franke W (1996) Dante’s Interpretive Journey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Franke W (ed.) (2007) On What Cannot Be Said: Apophatic Discourses in Philosophy, Religion, Literature, and the Arts. 2 vols. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
20.
Franke W (2014) A Philosophy of the Unsayable. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
21.
FrankeW (2015) The Revelation of Imagination: From Homer and the Bible through Virgil and Augustine to Dante, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
22.
FrankeW (2020) On the Universality of What Is Not: The Apophatic Turn in Critical Thinking, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
23.
Gragnolati M, Kay T, Lombardi E et al. (eds) (2012) Desire in Dante and the Middle Ages. Oxford: Legenda.
24.
HarrisonRP (1988) The Body of Beatrice, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
ImbachR (1996) Dante, la philosophie et les laïcs, Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.
26.
JanicaudD (1991) Le tournant théologique de la phénoménologie française, Combas: L’Eclat.
27.
JanicaudDChrétienJ-L, et al.(2000) Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn”: The French Debate, New York: Fordham University Press.
28.
Kantorowicz E (1957) The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
LeFort C (1993) La modernité de Dante. In: LeFort C (1993) La Monarchie. Trans. M Gally. Paris: Belin.
30.
Lyotard J-F (1979) La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Minuit.
31.
Marion JL (2015) Certitudes negatives. Paris: Grasset. 2010. (Trans. SE Lewis (2015) Negative Certainties. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
32.
MilbankJŽižekS (2009) The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic, Ed. C Davis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
MoevsC (2005) The Metaphysics of Dante’s Comedy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
NancyJL (2005) La Déclosion: Déconstruction du christianismeVol. 1Paris: Galilée.
OttavianiD (2004) La philosophie de la lumière chez Dante: Du Convivio à la Divine Comédie, Paris: Campion.
37.
RaffiA (2004) La Gloria del volgare: Ontologia e semiotica in Dante dal “Convivio” al “De vulgari eloquentia”, Catanzaro: Rubettino.
38.
SimmonsJABensonBE (2013) The New Phenomenology: A Philosophical Introduction, London: Bloomsbury.
39.
SternP (2018) Dante’s Philosophical Life: Politics and Wisdom in ‘Purgatorio’, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
40.
StoneGB (2006) Dante’s Pluralism and the Islamic Philosophy of Religion, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
Vattimo G (2002) Dopo la cristianità: Per un cristianesimo non religioso. Milan: Garzanti. (Trans. L D’Isanto (2002) After Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press).
42.
VicoG (1953 [1744]) Princìpi di scienza nuova, Ed. F Nicolini. Milan: Ricciardi.
43.
Ward G (ed.) (1998) The Postmodern God: A Theological Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
44.
Webb H (2016) Dante’s Persons: An Ethics of the Transhuman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
WellsAY (2018) The Manifest and the Revealed: A Phenomenology of Kenosis, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
46.
WiebeD (1999) The Politics of Religious Studies: The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, New York: St Martin’s Press.
47.
WildmanWJ (2018) In Our Own Image: Anthropomorphism, Apophaticism, and Ultimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
Žižek S (2010) A meditation on Michelangelo’s Christ on the Cross. In: Milbank J and Žižek S Paul’s New Moment: Continental Philosophy and the Future of Christian Theology. Ed. C Davis. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, pp. 169–182.
