Abstract
Recent work on law’s connection to literature has shown the immense overlap in narrative structuring, power dynamics, and social prejudices inherent to both literary and legal texts. Yet law-literature studies have often relied on nationalistic boundaries, overlooking the intense interchange of legal and literary ideas circulating across spatial and temporal divides. This article studies Italian novelle from a comparative perspective to uncover how concepts of law, justice, and authority circulate in literary texts across diverse geographies and legal systems. I specifically trace Shylock’s case, from its origins in the Italian novelle genre to the utilizations of The Merchant of Venice in American legal training and courtrooms. This case study illustrates the power of literature to synthesize diverse legal environments, influence popular understandings of law, and provide a comparative perspective of justice to both legal scholars and public audiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.Albanese G, Battaglia LR and Bessi R (eds) (2000) Favole, parabole, istorie: Le forme della scrittura novellistica dal Medioevo al Rinascimento . Rome: Salerno .
2.Allaire G (2003) The Italian Novella . New York: Routledge .
3.Ascham R (1968) The Schoolmaster . Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum .
4.Bec C (1967) Les Machands Écrivains. Affaires et Humanisme á Florence, 1375–1434 . Paris: Mouton .
5.Brooks CW (2008) Law, Politics, and Society . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
6.Budra P (2000) A Mirror for Magistrates and the De Casibus Tradition . Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
7.Carpi D and Gaakeer J (eds) (2013) Liminal Discourses: Subliminal Tensions in Law and Literature . Berlin: de Gruyter .
8.Cohen SA (1994) ‘The quality of mercy’: Law, equity and ideology in The Merchant of Venice . Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 27(4): 35–54 .
9.D’Amico J (2001) Shakespeare and Italy . Gainsville, FL: University Press of Florida .
10.Dean T and Lowe K (1994) Crime, Society, and the Law in Renaissance Italy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.Donadio R (2016) Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presides over Shylock’s appeal. The New York Times , 27 July. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/theater/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-venice-merchant-of-venice.html (accessed 9 January 2018) .
12.Fiorentino SG (1974) Il Pecorone . Ravenna: Longo Editore .
13.Grillo E (1949) Shakespeare and Italy . Glasgow: University Press Glasgow .
14.Grubb JS (1986) When myths lose power: Four decades of Venetian historiography. Journal of Modern History 58: 43–44 .
15.Hoenselaars AJ (1992) Images of Englishmen and Foreigners in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries: A Study of Stage Characters and National Identity in English Renaissance Drama, 1558–1642 . Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press .
16.Hyman JM and Love L (2002) If Portia were a mediator: An inquiry into justice in mediation. Clinical Law Review 9: 157–193 .
17.Kingsbury B and Straumann B (eds) (2010) The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
18.Klotz L (2011) Ben Jonson’s legal imagination in Volpone. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 51(2): 385–408 .
19.Kornstein D (1994) Kill All the Lawyers? Shakespeare’s Legal Appeal . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
20.Levith MJ (1989) Shakespeare’s Italian Settings and Plays . UK: Macmillan .
21.Mahler A (1997) Italian vices: Cross cultural constrictions of the temptation and desire in English Renaissance drama. In: Marrapodi A (ed) Shakespeare’s Italy . New York: Manchester University Press, pp.49–68 .
22.Marcelli N (2010) Eros, politica e religione nel Quattrocento fiorentio: Cinque studi tra poesia e novellistica . Rome: Vecchiarelli .
23.Marrapodi M (2007) Introduction. In: Marrapodi M (ed.) Italian Culture in the Drama of Shakespeare & His Contemporaries: Rewriting, Remaking, Refashioning . Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp.1–13 .
24.Martines L (2001) Strong Words Writing & Social Strain in the Italian Rennaissance . Baltimore, MD and London: The John Hopkins University Press .
25.Masugi K (1997) The rule of law, and The Merchant of Venice : From slavery to citizenship. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 11(13): 197–223 .
26.Mittica MP (2006) Raccontando il possible. Eschilo e le narrazioni giuridiche . Milan: Giuffrè .
27.Moe N (1995) Not a love story: Sexual aggression, law, and order in ‘Decameron X 4’. Romantic Review 86(4): 623–638 .
28.Muir E and Ruggiero G (1994) History from Crime: Selections from Quaderni Storici . Baltimore, MD and London: The John Hopkins University Press .
29.Noakes S (1981) The development of the book market in late quattrocento Italy. Journal of Medieval and Rennaissance Studies XI: 23–55 .
30.Picone M (2008) Boccaccio e la codificazione della novella: Letture del ‘Decameron’ . Ravenna: Longo Editore .
31.Posner R (2013) Law and commerce in The Merchant of Venice . In: Cormack B, Nussbaum M and Strier R (eds) Shakespeare and the Law . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 147–156 .
32.Rabell CR (2003) Rewriting the Italian Novella in Counter Reform Spain . Woodbridge: Tamesis Books .
33.Re ED (1961) The Roman contribution to the common law. Fordham Law Review 29(3): 447–494 .
34.Redmond MJ (2009) Shakespeare, Politics, and Italy . Farnham: Ashgate .
35.Ruthenburg MS (2003) Telling lies, telling lives: Giovanni Sercambi between Cronanca and Novella . In: Allaire G (ed.) The Italian Novella . New York: Routledge, pp. 69–81 .
36.Schwartz RM (2006) The price of justice and love in The Merchant of Venice . TriQuarterly 124: 225–251 .
37.Schwartz RM (2017) Loving Justice, Living Shakespeare . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
38.Shakespeare W (1987) The Merchant of Venice . New York: Signet Classics .
39.Smith LA (2008) Law imitating art: American judicial opinions performing The Merchant of Venice . Communication Law Review 8(2): 1–24 .
40.Steinberg J (2013) Dante and the Limits of the Law . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
41.Tang C (2012) The transformation of the law of nations and the reinvention of the novella: Legal history and literary innovation from Boccaccio’s Decameron to Goethe’s Unterhaltungen deutscher Ausgewanderten . Goethe Yearbook: Publications of the Goethe Society of North America 19: 67–92 .
42.Tiffany G (2006) Law and self-interest in The Merchant of Venice . Papers on Language and Literature 42(4): 384–400 .
43.Tomita S (1991) A Bibliographical Catalogue . London: Routledge .
44.Varvaro A (1989) Tra cronaca e novella. In: La Novella Italiana . Atti del Convegno di Caprarola, 19-24 settembre 1988, Rome: Salerno, vol. 1, pp. 155–171 .
45.Ward I (1995) Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
46.Weisberg R (1992) Poethics and Other Strategies of Law and Literature . New York: Columbia University Press .
47.Weisberg RH (1998) Antonio’s legalistic cruelty: Interdisciplinarity and ‘The Merchant of Venice’. College Literature 25(1): 12–20 .