The principle of normalization/social role valorization provides a powerful framework for improving the quality of life of individuals with disabilities. However, the principle needs to be adapted to the increasing cultural heterogeneity of the United States. Decisions about the goals of service provision should be informed by two principles: (1) cultural reciprocity, whereby professionals work in a collaborative manner with families, and (2) a sociocultural view of learning and development, which targets social rather than individual processes. Findings from a collaborative action research project with culturally diverse families are used to illustrate how professionals can provide assistance in a family's zone of proximal development, rather than targeting goals that are normative for the mainstream, but not for the family.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalgopalP. R. (1988). Social networks and Asian Indian families. In JacobsC.BowlesD. D. (Eds.), Ethnicity and race (pp. 18–33). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.*
2.
Bank-MikkelsenN. E. (1969). A metropolitan area in Denmark: Copenhagen. In KugelR.WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 227–254). Washington, DC: President's Commission on Mental Retardation.
3.
BanksJ.McGee-BanksC. A. (1997). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (3rd ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.*
4.
BernheimerL. P.GallimoreR.WeisnerT. S. (1990). Ecocultural theory as a context for the Individual Family Services Plan. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 219–233.
5.
CaninoI. A.CaninoG. (1980). Impact of stress on the Puerto Rican family: Treatment considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 535–541.
6.
ChanS. (1986). Parents of exceptional Asian children. In KitanoM. K.ChinnP. C. (Eds.), Exceptional Asian children and youth (pp. 12–28). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 276 178).
7.
Dixon-KraussL. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. New York: Longman.
8.
ElksM. A. (1994). Valuing the person or valuing the role? Critique of social role valorization theory. Mental Retardation, 32, 265–271.*
9.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC. J.IversonV. S. (1993). Choosing options and accommodations for children: A guide to planning inclusive education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
10.
GlaserB.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
GrunewaldK. (1969). A rural county in Sweden: Mallmohus County. In KugelR.WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 255–287). Washington, DC: President's Commission on Mental Retardation.
12.
HarryB. (1998). Parental views of “una vida normal/a normal life”: Cultural variations on a theme. In MeyerL.ParkH.Grenot-ScheyerM.SchwartzI.HarryB. (Eds.), Making friends: The influences of culture and development (pp. 47–62). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
13.
HarryB.DayM.QuistF. (1999). He can't really play: An ethnographic study of sibling acceptance and interaction. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 289–299.
14.
HellerT.FactorA. (1988). Permanency planning among Black and White family caregivers of older adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 26, 203–208.
15.
HellerT.FactorA. (1991). Permanency planning for adults with mental retardation living with family caregivers. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 96, 163–176.
16.
HillR. B. (1993). Research on the African-American family: A holistic perspective. Westport, CT: Auburn House.*
17.
KalyanpurM. (1996). The influences of western special education on community-based services in India. Disability and Society, 11, 249–269.
18.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (1997). A posture of reciprocity: A practical approach to collaboration between professionals and parents of culturally diverse backgrounds. Journal of Child and Family Studies6, 485–509.
19.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (1999). Culture in special education: Building a posture of cultural reciprocity in parent-professional interactions. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
Locust, (1988). Wounding the spirit: Discrimination and traditional American Indian belief systems. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 315–330.
22.
MedicineB. (1981). American Indian family: Cultural change and adaptive strategies. Journal of Ethnic Studies, 8(4), 13–23.
23.
MeyerL. H.ParkH.Grenot-ScheyerM.SchwartzI.HarryB. (1998). Participatory research approaches for the study of social relationships of children and youth. In MeyerL. H.ParkH.Grenot-ScheyerM.SchwartzI.HarryB. (Eds.), Making friends: The influences of culture and development (pp. 3–30). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
MeyersC. E.BorthwickS. A.EymanR. K. (1985). Place of residence by age, ethnicity, and level of retardation of the mentally retarded/developmentally disabled population of California. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90(3), 266–270.
25.
MilesM.MilesC. (1993). Education and disability in cross-cultural perspective: Pakistan. In PetersS. (Ed.), Education and disability in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 61–79). New York: Garland Press.
26.
MollL. C. (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.*
27.
NirjeB. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In KugelR.WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded. (pp. 179–195). Washington, DC: President's Commission on Mental Retardation.
28.
PedlarA. (1990). Normalization and integration: A look at the Swedish experience. Mental Retardation, 28, 275–282.
29.
RacinoJ. A.TaylorS. J. (1993). “People first”: Approaches to housing and support. In RacinoJ. A.WalkerP.O'ConnorS.TaylorS. J. (Eds.), Housing support, and community: Choices and strategies for adults with disabilities, Vol. 2. (pp. 33–56). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
30.
RamirezM.Price-WilliamsD. R. (1971). The relationship of culture to educational attainment. Houston, TX: Rice University, Center for Research in Social Change and Economic Development.*
31.
RogoffB. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209–229.
32.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity in three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V.Del RioP.AlvarezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
RogoffB.Baker-SennettJ.LacasaP.GoldsmithD. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child Development, 67, 45–65.
34.
SerpellR. (1997). Literacy connections between school and home: How should we evaluate them?Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 587–616.
35.
Suarez-OrozcoM. M. (1989). Central American refugees and U.S. high schools. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
TharpR. G.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.*
37.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.*
38.
WeisnerT. S. (1993a). Siblings in cultural place: Ethnographic and ecocultural perspectives on siblings of developmentally delayed children. In StonemanZ.BermanP. (Eds.), Siblings of individuals with mental retardation, physical disabilities, and chronic illness (pp. 51–83). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
39.
WeisnerT. S. (1993b). Overview: Sibling similarity and difference in different cultures. In NuckollsCharles (Ed.), Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and sisters in cultural context (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford Press.*
40.
WertschJ. V. (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.*
41.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.*
42.
WertschJ. V.del RioP.AlvarezA. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.*
43.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute of Mental Retardation.*
44.
WolfensbergerW. (1980). The definition of normalization: Update, problems, disagreements, and misunderstandings. In FlynnR. J.NitschK. E. (Eds.), Normalization, social integration, and community services (pp. 71–115). Baltimore: University Park.*
45.
WolfensbergerW. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234–239.
46.
WolfensbergerW. (1995). An “if this, then that” formulation of decisions related to social role valorization as a better way of interpreting it to people. Mental Retardation, 33, 163–169.
