Over the past two decades, exemplary practices regarding support services have been shifting away from specialist-reliant models and toward approaches that rely more on natural supports. This study explored attitudes regarding educational and related service-provision practices from the perspective of professionals and parents (n = 119) who were educational team members for students with deaf-blindness and multiple disabilities in general education settings. The findings highlight sample respondents' agreements and disagreements with exemplary practices, as well as differences across subgroups and within teams. Analyses suggest some internal inconsistencies regarding important service provision practices, as well as continuing gaps between attitudes and proposed exemplary practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 102 S.Ct. 3034 (1982).
2.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BradleyV.KnollJ. (1995). Shifting paradigms in services to people with disabilities. In KaranO.GreenspanS. (Eds.), Community rehabilitation for people with disabilities (pp. 5–19). Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
4.
CloningerC. J.GiangrecoM. F. (1995). Including students with deaf-blindness in general education classes. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 89 (3), 262–266.
5.
Code of Federal Regulations. (1994). Education, 34, 300–399. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.
6.
FoxT.WilliamsW. (1991). Implementing best practices for all students in their local school. Burlington: University of Vermont, University Affiliated Program of Vermont. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 977).
7.
GiangrecoM. F. (1990). Making related service decisions for students with severe disabilities: Roles, criteria, and authority. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(1), 17–25.
8.
GiangrecoM. F. (1996). Vermont Interdependent Services Team Approach (VISTA): A guide to coordinating educational support services. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC.MuellerP.YuanS.AshworthS. (1991). Perspectives of parents whose children have dual sensory impairments. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 14–24.
10.
GiangrecoM. F.DennisR.CloningerC.EdelmanS.SchattmanR. (1993). “I've counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
11.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS.DennisR. (1991). Common professional practices that interfere with the integrated delivery of related services. Remedial and Special Education, 15(5), 288–296.
12.
HaringN.RomerL. (1995). Welcoming students who are deaf-blind into typical classrooms: Facilitating school participation, learning and friendships. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1990) U.S. Congress, Public Law 101-476, Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990.
14.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 104 S.Ct. 3371 (1984).
15.
KuncN. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow's hierarchy of needs. In VillaR.ThousandJ.StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools (pp. 25–39). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
LeakeD.JamesR.StoddenR. (1995). Shifting paradigms to natural supports: A practical response to a crisis in disabilities services. In KaranO.GreenspanS. (Eds.), Community rehabilitation for people with disabilities (pp. 20–37). Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
17.
MeyerL.EichingerJ. (1994). Program quality indicators (PQI): A checklist of most promising practices in educational programs for students with disabilities (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Education.
18.
NisbetJ. (1992). Natural supports at home, school, and in the community for people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS System, Version 6.09. Cary, NC: Author.
