Performance on mathematics word problems having varying structures was compared for Grade 3–8 students with and without mild disabilities. Students with disabilities performed at significantly lower levels than did those without disabilities in four types of word problems, even when the problems involved only single-digit computation. Significant effects were also evident for grade and operation (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division). The findings highlight the need for math instruction to move from a focus on computation to problem-solving activities, including word problems of varying structures. Further, test developers must make more effort to present a variety of reasoning and problem-solving activities in standardized tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaroodyA. J. (1987). Children's mathematical thinking. New York: Columbia Teachers' College Press.
2.
BessantH. P. (1972). The effects of semantic familiarity and information load on the arithmetical verbal problem-solving performance of children in special classes for the educable mentally retarded. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 2787A.
3.
BlankenshipC. S., & LovittT. C. (1976). Story problems: Merely confusing or downright befuddling?Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7, 290–298.
4.
BreaultM. A. (1983). The effects of selected variables on the arithmetical verbal problem solving performance of learning disabled children. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44 (2-A), 431.
5.
BriarsD. J., & LarkinJ. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245–296.
6.
CarpenterT.AnsellE.FrankeM. L.FennemaE., & WeisbeckL. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children's problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 428–441.
7.
CarpenterT.CorbittM.KepnerH.LindquistM., & ReysR. (1980). Solving word problems: Results and implications from national assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 28, 8–12.
8.
CawleyJ. F.Fitzmaurice-HayesA., & ShawR. (1988). Mathematics for the mildly handicapped: A guide to curriculum and instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
CawleyJ. F., & GoodmanJ. O. (1969). Arithmetic problem solving: A demonstration with the mentally handicapped. Exceptional Children, 35, 83–88.
10.
CawleyJ. F., & MillerJ. H. (1986). Selected views on metacognition, arithmetic problem solving and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 1, 36–48.
11.
CawleyJ. F.MillerJ. H., & SchoolB. A. (1987). A brief inquiry of arithmetic word problem solving among learning disabled secondary students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2(2), 87–93.
12.
CawleyJ. F., & ParmarR. S. (1994). Structuring word problems for diagnostic teaching: Helping teachers meet the needs of students with mild disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26(4), 16–21.
13.
CawleyJ. F.ParmarR. S., & MillerJ. H. (1992). The Arithmetic Appraisal Battery. Buffalo, NY: United Educational Services.
14.
ClarkJ. R., & EadsL. K. (1954). Guiding Arithmetic Learning. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
15.
CruickshankW. M. (1948). Arithmetic ability of mentally retarded children: Understanding arithmetic processes. Journal of Educational Research, 42, 279–288.
16.
EnglertC. S.CulattaB. E., & HornD. G. (1987). Influence of irrelevant information in addition word problems on problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 29–36.
17.
FuchsL.BahrC., & ReithH. (1989). Effects of goal structures and performance contingencies on the math performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(9), 554–560.
18.
GoodsteinH. A.BessantH. P.ThibodeauG.VitelloS., & VlahakosI. (1972). The effects of three variables on the verbal problem solving of educable mentally handicapped children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 703–705.
19.
HarmonM. C., & MungalC. F. (1992). Appendix B: An analysis of standardized and text-embedded tests in mathematics. In LomaxR. G. (Ed.), The influence of testing on teaching math and science in Grades 4–12. Boston: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
KulmG. (1990). New directions for mathematics assessment. In KulmG. (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 71–80). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 201).
22.
LeonR. (1993). The effect of the presence of extraneous information in mathematical word problems on the performance of Hispanic learning disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
23.
LeshR., & LamonS. J. (1992). Trends, goals, & priorities in mathematics assessment. In LeshR. & LamonS. J. (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 262).
24.
LewisA., & MayerR. (1987). Student's misconceptions of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 363–371.
25.
MarshallS. P. (1990). The assessment of schema knowledge for arithmetic story problems: A cognitive science perspective. In KulmG. (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 155–168). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 201).
26.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 336).
27.
ParmarR. S. (1992). Protocol analysis of strategies used by students with mild disabilities when solving arithmetic word problems. Diagnostique, 17(4), 227–243.
28.
ParmarR. S.CawleyJ. F., & FrazitaR. R. (in press). Mathematics assessment for students with mild disabilities: An exploration of content validity. Learning Disability Quarterly.
29.
PetersonP.FennemaE.CarpenterT., & LoefM. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1–40.
30.
RileyM. S.GreenoJ. G., & HellerJ. I. (1983). Development of children's problem solving ability in arithmetic. In GinsburgH. P. (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–196). New York: Academic.
31.
SmithM. (1994). The influence of picture format and indefinite quantifiers on the ability of students with serious emotional disturbances to solve word problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
32.
TrenholmeB.ParkerR., & LarsenS. (1978). The effects of syntactic complexity upon arithmetic performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 69–76.
33.
Velez-SerraD. (1974). Effects of extraneous information on the solving of arithmetic problems by the Spanish-speaking mentally handicapped. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
34.
VerschaffelL. (1994). Using retelling data to study elementary school children's representations and solutions of compare problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 141–163.
35.
YsseldykeJ. E., & AlgozzineR. (1990). Introduction to special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
36.
ZigmondN., & MillerS. E. (1986). Assessment for instructional planning. Exceptional Children, 52, 501–509.
