This article describes findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) of Special Education Students regarding trends in the employment, wages, postsecondary education, and residential independence of youth with disabilities in their first 5 years after high school. Data from the NLTS indicated strong gains in all four outcome areas over time. In all areas, however, youth with disabilities continued to lag behind their peers in the general population. Several differences between youth in certain disability categories were found regarding employment, postsecondary education, and movement toward independence over time. Longitudinal outcomes also differed widely by gender, ethnicity, and high school completion status.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AffleckJ. Q.EdgarE.LevineP., & KorteringL. (1990). Postschool status of students classified as mildly mentally retarded, learning disabled, or nonhandicapped: Does it get better with time?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25(4), 315–324.
2.
BlackorbyJ. (1993). Participation in vocational education by students with disabilities. In WagnerM. (Ed.), The secondary school programs of students with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students, (pp. 5–1–5–48). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365 084).
3.
Center for Human Resource Research (CHRR). (1988). NLS Handbook: 1988. The National Longitudinal Surveys of Labor Market Experiences. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
4.
D'AmicoR. (1991). The working world awaits: Employment experiences during and shortly after secondary school. In WagnerM.NewmanL.D'AmicoR.JayE. D.Butler-NelsonP.MarderC., and CoxR. (Eds.), Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students (pp. 8–1–8–55). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 228).
5.
EdgarE. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children, 53, 555–561.
6.
FreemanR. B., & WiseD. A. (Eds.). (1982). The youth labor market problem: It's nature, causes, and consequences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
GardnerJ. A. (1987). Transition from high school to postsecondary education: Analytical studies. Washington, DC: Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 280 370).
8.
GillD., & EdgarE. (1990). Outcome of a vocational program designed for students with mild disabilities: The Pierce County vocational/special education cooperative. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 12(3), 17–22.
9.
HalpernA. S. (1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51, 479–486.
10.
HalpernA. S. (1992). Transition: Old wine in new bottles. Exceptional Children, 58, 202–211.
11.
HalpernA. S. (1993). Quality of life as a conceptual framework for evaluating transition outcomes. Exceptional Children, 59, 486–498.
12.
HasaziS.GordonL. R., & RoeC. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
13.
JavitzH., & WagnerM. (1990). The National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students: Report on sample design and limitations, Wave 1 (1987). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 151).
14.
JavitzH., & WagnerM. (1993). The National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students: Sample characteristics and procedures, Wave 2 (1990). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15.
LevineP., & EdgarE. (1994). A question of gender: An analysis by gender of long-term postschool outcomes for youth with learning disabilities, mild mental retardation, and no disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 282–300.
16.
MarderC.HabinaK., & PrinceN. (1992). The National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students: Report on procedures for the second wave of data collection (1990). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 152).
17.
MincerJ. (1989). Human capital and the labor market: A review of current research. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 27–34.
18.
MithaugD. E.HoriuchiC. N., & FanningP. N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of special education students. Exceptional Children, 51, 397–404.
19.
MurphyK., & WelchF. (1989). Wage premiums for college graduates: Recent growth and possible explanations. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 27–34.
20.
SchlossP. J.AlperS., & JayneD. (1994). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60, 215–225.
21.
SiegelS.RobertM.GreenerK.MeyerG.HalloranW., & Gaylord-RossR. (1993). Career ladders for challenged youths in transition from school to adult life. Austin: PRO-ED.
22.
SitlingtonP. L., & FrankA. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 97–111.
23.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1991). Current population reports, Series P-20. Marital status and living arrangements, nos. 410 and 445.
24.
WagnerM. (1992a). “A little help from my friends”: The social involvement of young people with disabilities. In WagnerM.D'AmicoR.MarderC.NewmanL., & BlackorbyJ., What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: The second-comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students (pp. 6–1–6–43). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
25.
WagnerM. (1992b). Analytic overview: NETS design and longitudinal analysis approach. In WagnerM.D'AmicoR.MarderC.NewmanL., & BlackorbyJ., What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students (pp. 2–1–2–14). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 603).
26.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ., & HebbelerK. (1993). Beyond the report card: The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365 088).
27.
WagnerM.NewmanL., & ShaverD. (1989). The National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students: Report on procedures for the first wave of data collection (1987). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 316 552).
28.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ.CametoR., & NewmanL. (1993). What makes a difference? Influences on postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: The third comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
