During the elementary and middle school years, the needs of the child with disabilities center on acquiring appropriate academic, social, community access, and self-management skills. Family members must work together with a wide array of educational and related services personnel on behalf of their child with a disability and, at the same time, care for the needs of all members of the family. This article describes models and methods of advocacy, including self-advocacy, social support advocacy, interpersonal advocacy, and legal advocacy. Particular emphasis is placed on advocacy strategies for individual family members of the child with disabilities during the elementary and middle school years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act, P.L. 101–336. (1990). 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq: Federal Register, 56(144), 35544–35756.
2.
ApolloniT. (1984, November). Self-advocacy: How to be a winner. National Information Center for Handicapped Children and Youth Newsletter, 1–4.
3.
BrowderD. M., & SnellM. E. (1987). Functional academics. In SnellM. E. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of students with severe handicaps (3rd ed., pp. 436–468). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
4.
CovertS. B. (1992). Supporting families. In NisbetJ. (Ed.), Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with severe disabilities (pp. 121–163). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, P.L. 95–602, and amendments. (1973). U.S. Code 1988, Title 42 §§ 6000, 6001, 6006, 6008, et seq.
5.
Grenot-ScheyerM.EshilianL., & FalyeyM. (1989). Functional academic skills. In FalveyM. (Ed.), Community based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe disabilities (pp. 285–320). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
HerrS. (1983). Rights and advocacy for retarded people. Toronto: Lexington.
7.
HinesM. (1986). A practical guide to advocacy. Lifetime planning manual, 1984–85. Lansing, MI: Michigan State Department of Mental Health. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 831).
8.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, P.L. 101–476. (1990). 20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq.
9.
JorgensenC. M. (1992). Natural supports in inclusive schools: Curricular and teaching strategies. In NisbetJ. (Ed.), Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with disabilities (pp. 179–215). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
McLoughlinJ. A., & SennC. (1994). Siblings of children with disabilities. In AlperS.SchlossP. J., & SchlossC. N. (Eds.), Families of students with disabilities: Consultation and advocacy (pp. 95–122). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
National Paralegal Institute. (1980). Mental health advocacy training kit: Introduction to mental health advocacy. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
NeufeldG. R. (1980). Advocacy and the human service delivery system. In Mental health advocacy training kit: Introduction to mental health advocacy. Washington, DC: National Paralegal Institute.
13.
Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, Civil Action Nos. 79–1404, 79–1414, 79–1415, 79–1489, U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (1981).
14.
RainforthB.YorkJ., & MacDonaldC. (1992). Collaborative teams for students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
RhoadesC.BrowningP., & ThorinE. (1986). Self-help advocacy movement: A promising peer-support system for people with mental disabilities. Rehabilitation Literature, 47(1–2), 2–7.
16.
RogersJ. (1988). Individual advocacy. Philadelphia: National Mental Health Consumers' Association.
17.
RyndakD. L., & AlperS. (1995). Curriculum content for students with moderate and severe disabilities in inclusive settings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
SchlossC. N., & JayneD. (1994). Models and methods of advocacy. In AlperS.SchlossP. J., & SchlossC. N. (Eds.), Families of students with disabilities: Consultation and advocacy (pp. 229–250). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
SingerG., & ApolloniT. (1981). Successful living. Understanding Californians with special developmental needs. Sacramento: California State Council on Developmental Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227–605).
SnowJ., & ForestM. (1987). Circles. In ForestM. (Ed.), More education integration. Downsview, Ontario: G. Allan Roeher Institute.
22.
StrullyJ. L., & StrullyC. F. (1989). Family support to promote integration. In StainbackS.StainbackW., & ForestM. (Eds.), Educating students in the mainstream of education (pp. 213–219). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
TurnbullA. P.StricklandB. B., & BrantleyJ. C. (1982). Developing and implementing individualized education programs. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
24.
TurnbullA. P., & TurnbullH. R.II. (1990). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25.
WardJ. (1986). Citizen advocacy: Its legal context. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 12(2), 91–96.
26.
WidrickG.HasaziJ., & HasaziS. (1990). Citizen advocacy relationships: Advocate, protege, and relationship characteristics and satisfaction ratings. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(3), 170–176.
