This article provides supporting evidence for the use of a revised version of the Opinions Relative to Mainstreaming (ORM) scale. Analyses of data produced by a test of the revised scale, the Opinions Relative to Integration of Students with Disabilities (ORI), indicated satisfactory item characteristics and adequate reliability and homogeneity. Initial support for ORI's construct validity was demonstrated by the results of regression analyses relating ORI scores to respondent sociodemographic and experiential data and scores on the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons (SADP). The ORI should prove useful to researchers evaluating the attitudes of educators toward the integration of students with disabilities into general education classrooms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanB. M. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems, 28, 321–337.
2.
AndersonR. J., & AntonakR. F. (1992). The influence of attitudes and contact on reactions to persons with physical and speech disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 240–247.
3.
AntonakR. F. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13(2), 22–29.
4.
AntonakR. F. (1985). Construct validation of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 16(1), 7–10, 48.
5.
AntonakR. F., & LivnehH. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometrics, and scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
BenhamP. K. (1988). Attitudes of occupational therapy personnel toward persons with disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 305–311.
7.
BerrymanJ. D., & NealW. R.Jr. (1980). The cross validation of the Attitudes Toward Mainstreaming Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 469–474.
8.
BiklenD. P. (1985). Mainstreaming: From compliance to quality. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(1), 58–61.
9.
ChanF.HuaM. S.JuJ. J., & LamC. S. (1984). Factorial structure of the Chinese Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons: A cross-validation study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7, 317–319.
10.
DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D., & BrakkeN. P. (1982). Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: The role of social approach and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 389–410.
11.
Garvar-PinhasA., & SchmelkinL. P. (1989). Administrators' and teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 38–43.
12.
GreenK.RockD. L., & WeisensteinG. R. (1983). Validity and reliability of a scale assessing attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 50, 182–183.
13.
HannahM. E. (1988). Teacher attitudes toward children with disabilities‘. An ecological analysis. In YukerH. E. (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 154–170). New York: Springer.
14.
HorneM. D. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer and parent reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
JamiesonJ. D. (1984). Attitudes of educators toward the handicapped. In JonesR. L. (Ed.), Attitude and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 206–222). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
16.
JonesR. L. (Ed.). (1984). Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
17.
LarriveeB. (1981). Effect of inservice training intensity on teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 48, 34–39.
18.
LarriveeB. (1982). Factors underlying regular classroom teachers' attitudes to mainstreaming. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 374–379.
19.
LarriveeB. (1985). Effective teaching for successful mainstreaming. New York: Longman.
20.
LarriveeB., & CookL. (1979). Mainstreaming: A study of the variables affecting teacher attitude. Journal of Special Education, 13, 315–324.
21.
LarriveeB., & HorneM. D. (1991). Social status: A comparison of mainstreamed students with peers of different ability levels. Journal of Special Education, 25, 90–101.
22.
LikertR. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, No. 140.
23.
MathewsR. M.WhiteG. W., & Mrdjenovich-HanksP. (1990). Using a slide presentation to change attitudes toward people with disabilities and knowledge of independent living services. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 33, 301–306.
24.
NaderA. (1984). Teacher attitude toward the elementary exceptional child. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7, 37–46.
25.
ReynoldsW. M., & GrecoV. T. (1980). The reliability and factorial validity of a scale for measuring teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 463–468.
26.
RoushS. E., & KlocklarsA. J. (1988). Construct validation of two scales measuring attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 54(3), 25–30.
27.
SchmelkinL. P. (1981). Teachers' and nonteachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 48, 42–47.
28.
SchmelkinL. P. (1988). Multidimensional perspectives in the perception of disabilities. In YukerH. E. (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 127–138). New York: Springer.
29.
TriandisH. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
WinzerM. (1985). Teacher attitudes toward mainstreaming: An appraisal of the research. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 9, 149–161.
31.
YukerH. E.BlockJ. R., & CampbellW. J. (1960). A scale to measure attitudes toward disabled persons (Human Resources Study No. 5). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
32.
YukerH. E.BlockJ. R., & YoungJ. H. (1966). The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons (ATDP) scale. (Human Resources Study No. 7). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
