Forty-nine adults with learning disabilities were interviewed about their college experiences. Most of the respondents adjusted well to the demands and complexities of college. Approximately 90% of the participants graduated from college in approximately 5.5 years. In addition, students typically attended more than one college or university and pursued a variety of majors. Keys and barriers to success were examined, and recommendations were also made for improving educational outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanP., & VogelS. (1990). College graduates with learning disabilities—Employment attainment and career patterns. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 154–166.
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, P.L. 101–336 (1991).
3.
BakerH. (1972, May). Famous people who have been handicapped: A critical analysis. Paper presented at the Distinguished Lecture Series in Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
4.
BruckM. (1985). The adult functioning of children with specific learning disabilities: A follow-up study. In SiegelL. (Ed.), Advances in applied developmental psychology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
BruckM. (1987). The adult outcomes of children with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 252–263.
6.
BursuckW.RoseE.CowenS., & YahayaM. (1989). Nationwide survey of postsecondary education services for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56, 236–245.
7.
CohenJ. (1984). The learning disabled and university student: Signs and initial screening. NASPA Journal, 21, 22–31.
8.
DurlakC.RoseE., & BursuckW. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education: Teaching the skills of self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 51–59.
9.
GajarA. (1989). A computer analysis of written language variables and a comparison of compositions written by university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 125–130.
10.
GajarA.MurphyJ., & HuntF. (1982). A university program for learning disabled students. Reading Improvement, 19, 282–288.
11.
GerberP.GinsbergR., & ReiffL. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475–487.
12.
GreenbaumB.GrahamS., & ScalesW. (1994). Adults with learning disabilities: Occupational and social status after college. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
HartzellH., & ComptonC. (1984). Learning disabilities: A ten year following. Pediatrics, 74, 1058–1064.
14.
HouckC.AsselinS.TroutmanG., & ArringtonJ. (1992). Students with learning disabilities in the university environment: A study of faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 678–684.
15.
HughesC., & SmithJ. (1990). Cognitive and academic performance of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 66–79.
16.
JavorskyJ.SparksR., & GanschowL. (1992). Perceptions of college students with and without specific learning disabilities about foreign language courses. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 31–44.
17.
KarpinskiM.NeubertD., & GrahamS. (1992). A follow-along study of postsecondary outcomes for graduates and dropouts with mild disabilities in a rural setting. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 376–385.
18.
MakerJ. (1978). The self-perceptions of successful handicapped scientists. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of the Education for the Handicapped.
19.
MangrumC., & StrichartS. (1984). College and the learning disabled student. New York: Grune & Straton.
20.
Maryland Longitudinal Study. (1990). The UMCP graduate perspective. MLS research highlights. College Park: University of Maryland. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 816).
21.
MatthewsP.AndersonD.SkolnickD. (1987). Faculty attitude toward accommodations for college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 46–52.
22.
MurphyS. (1992). On being LD: Perspectives and strategies of young adults. New York: Teachers College Press.
RoffmanA.HerzogJ.Wershba-GershonP. (1994). Helping young adults understand their learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 413–419.
25.
RoganL., & HartmanL. (1976). A follow-up study of learning disabled children as adults. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau for the Education of the Handicapped.
26.
RoganL., & HartmanL. (1990). Adult outcome of learning disabled students ten years after initial follow-up. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 91–102.
27.
RoseE. (1991). Project TAPE: A model of technical assistance for service providers of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities and Practice, 6, 25–33.
28.
SaracogluB.MindenH., & WilcheskyM. (1989). The adjustment of students with learning disabilities to university and its relationship to self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 590–592.
29.
ScuccimaraD., & SpeeceD. (1990). Employment outcomes and social integration of students with mild handicaps: The quality of life two years after high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 213–219.
30.
SparksR.GanschowL., & JavorskyJ. (1992). Diagnosing and accommodating the foreign language learning difficulties of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 150–160.
31.
SpeckmanN.GoldbergR., & HermanK. (1992). Learning disabled children grow up: A search for factors related to success in the young adult years. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 161–170.
32.
SpeckmanN.GoldbergR., & HermanK. (1993). An exploration of risk and resilience in the lives of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 11–18.
33.
SuritskyS., & HughesC. (1991). Benefits of note-taking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 7–18.
34.
U.S. Department of Education. (1989). Profile of handicapped students in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Post-Secondary Education Statistics Division. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 310 616).
35.
Van ReusenA., & BosC. (1994). Facilitating student participation in individualized education programs through motivation strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 60, 466–475.
36.
VogelS. (1986). Levels and patterns of intellectual functioning among LD college students: Clinical and educational implications. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 71–79.
37.
VogelS., & AdelmanP. (1990). Intervention effectiveness at the postsecondary level for the learning disabled. In ScruggsT. & WongB. (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 329–344). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38.
VogelS., & AdelmanP. (1992). The success of college students with learning disabilities: Factors related to educational attainment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 430–441.
39.
VogelS.HrubyP., & AdelmanP. (1993). Educational and psychological factors in successful and unsuccessful college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 35–43.
40.
WagnerM. (1989). The transition experiences of youth with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 988).
41.
WechslerD. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
WestM.KregelJ.GetzelE.ZhuM.IpsenS., & MartinD. (1993). Beyond Section 504: Satisfaction and empowerment of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptional Children, 59, 456–467.
44.
Years in college lasting longer. (1990, February). Chicago Tribune, p. C2.
