Interviews were conducted to gather advice about integration from general and special education teachers and administrators from 10 schools in five school districts where students with moderate and severe disabilities had recently been integrated into general education schools and classrooms. The study explored not only the educational change process, but general educators' perceptions of factors that had initially created and later reduced their resistance to integration. Qualitative analysis of interview data revealed teachers' perceptions of the success of integration, as well as their advice to others contemplating integration: district administrators, building administrators, special education teachers, and general education teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BredoA. E., & BredoE. R. (1975). Effects of environment and structure on the process of innovation. In BaldridgeJ. W. & DealR. E. (Eds.), Managing change in educational organizations (pp. 449–467). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
2.
ColeD. A., & MeyerL. H. (1991). Social integration and severe disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of child outcomes. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 340–351.
3.
DoyleW., & PonderG. (1977–1978). The practicality ethic in teacher decision making. Interchange, 8(3), 1–12.
4.
EvansI. M.SalisburyC. L.PalombaroM. M.BerrymanJ., & HollowoodT. M. (1992). Peer interactions and social acceptance of elementary-age children with severe disabilities in an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 205–212.
5.
FergusonD. L.MeyerG.JeanchildL.JuniperL., & ZingoJ. (1992). Figuring out what to do with the grownups: How teachers make inclusion “work” for students with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 218–226.
6.
FullanM. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
GartnerA., & LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.
8.
GiangrecoM. F.DennisR.CloningerC.EdelmanS., & SchattmanR. (1993). “I've counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
9.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
HallG. E., & HordS. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
HubermanA. M., & MilesM. B. (1984). Innovation close up: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum Press.
12.
KarpH. B. (1984). Working with resistance. Training and Development Journal, 24, 69–84.
13.
KozleskiE. B., & JacksonL. (1993). Taylor's story: Full inclusion in her neighborhood elementary school. Exceptionality, 4, 153–175.
14.
LaRocqueL., & ColemanP. (1989). Quality control: School accountability and district ethos. In HolmesM.LeithwoodK., & MusellaD. (Eds.), Educational policy for effective schools (pp. 168–191). Toronto: OISE Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 420).
15.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
LytleJ. H. (1988). Is special education serving minority students? A response to Singer and Butler. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 116–120.
17.
McLaughlinM. J., & WarrenS. H. (1992). Issues and options in restructuring schools and special education programs. College Park, MD: University of Maryland and Westat, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 774).
18.
Oberti v. Clementon, 995 S.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993).
19.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
PurkeyS. C., & SmithM. S. (1985). School reform: The district policy implications of the effective school literature. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 353–389.
21.
RogersJ. (1993, May). The inclusion revolution. Research Bulletin of Phi Delta Kappa, No. II, 1–6.
22.
SalisburyC. L.PalombaroM. M., & HollowoodT. M. (1993). On the nature and change of an inclusive elementary school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 75–84.
23.
SarasonS. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
SkrticT. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148–206.
25.
TaylorS. J. (1982). From segregation to integration: Strategies for integrating severely handicapped students in normal school and community settings. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(3), 42–49.
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
YorkJ.VandercookT.MacDonaldC.Heise-NeffC., & CaugheyE. (1992). Feedback about integrating middle-school students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Exceptional Children, 58, 244–258.
