This article considers possible reasons that research knowledge is not used more extensively in special education practice and suggests issues to be addressed in solving this problem. We contrast research knowledge and practice knowledge and describe factors that moderate the influence of research on practice, in both general and special education. These factors include teacher knowledge and learning, teacher attitudes and beliefs, and context. We conclude by considering various issues and alternatives for reconceptualizing the relationship between research and practice in special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BickelW. E., & BickelD. D. (1986). Effective schools, classrooms, and instruction: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children, 52, 489–500.
2.
BrandtR. (1992). On research on teaching: A conversation with Lee Shulman. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 14–19.
3.
BrookhartS. M., & FreemanD. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37–60.
4.
CarnineD. (1993). Facts over fads: Testing out “innovations” might save money, time and good will. Education Week, 13(14), 40.
5.
CohenD. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que ca change …. In JacksonP. W. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
6.
ColeA. L., & KnowlesJ. G. (1993). Teacher development partnership research: A focus on methods and issues. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 473–495.
7.
CronbachL. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
8.
CronbachL. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
9.
CubanL. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In JacksonP. W. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
10.
EnglertC. S.TarrantK. L., & MariageT. V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15(2), 62–86.
11.
FlemingD. S. (1988, April). The literature on teacher utilization of research: Implications for the school reform movement. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
12.
FuhrmanS. H. (1992, June). Uniting producers and consumers: Challenges in creating and utilizing educational research and development. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Educational Research and Development, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 685).
13.
FullanM. G. (1992, June). Teachers as critical consumers of research. Paper commissioned by OECD for Seminar on Producers and Consumers of Research, Washington, DC.
14.
GerstenR.DarchC.DavisG., & GeorgeN. (1991). Apprenticeship and intensive training of consulting teachers: A naturalistic study. Exceptional Children, 57, 226–236.
15.
GerstenR.WoodwardJ., & MorvantM. (1992). Refining the working knowledge of experienced teachers. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 34–38.
16.
GerstenR. M., & WoodwardJ. (1992). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: Strategies for assisting classroom teachers' work with at-risk students and students with disabilities. In CarnineD. and KameenuiE. (Eds.), Higher cognitive functioning for all students (pp. 201–218). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17.
GiangrecoM. F.DennisR.CloningerC.EdelmanS., & SchattmanR. (1993). “I've counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
18.
GoldenbergC., & GallimoreR. (1991). Local knowledge, research knowledge, and educational change: A case study of early Spanish reading improvement. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 2–14.
19.
HubermanM. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4(4), 478–510.
20.
HubermanM. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 363–391.
21.
KaestleC. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.
22.
KauffmanJ. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6–16.
23.
KaufmanM.SchillerE.BirmanB., & CoutinhoM. (1993). A federal perspective on improving practices, programs, and policies in special education. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 263–269.
24.
KleinS. S. (1992). A framework for redesigning an R&D-based national education dissemination system in the United States. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 13(3), 256–286.
LindblomC. E., & CohenD. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem-solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27.
LittleJ. W. (1984). Seductive images and organizational realities in professional development. Teachers College Record, 86(1), 84–102.
28.
Loucks-HorsleyS., & RoodyD. S. (1990). Using what is known about change to inform the regular education initiative. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 51–56.
29.
LouisK. S. (1992). Comparative perspectives on dissemination and knowledge use policies supporting school improvement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 13(3), 287–304.
30.
MorsinkC. V.SoarR. S.SoarR. M., & ThomasR. (1986). Research on teaching: Opening the door to special education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 53, 32–40.
31.
MunceyD. E., & McQuillanP. J. (1993). Preliminary findings from a five-year study of the Coalition of Essential Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 486–489.
32.
National Academy of Education. (1991). Research and the renewal of education. Stanford, CA: Author.
33.
OsherD., & KaneM. (1993). Describing and studying innovations in the education of children with attention deficit disorder. Washington, DC: Chesapeake Institute.
34.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
35.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.
36.
RichardsonV. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.
37.
RichardsonV.AndersP.TidwellD., & LloydC. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559–586.
38.
SarasonS. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SashkinM., & EgermeierJ. (1993). School change models and processes: A review and synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 960).
40.
ShavelsonR. J. (1988). Contributions of educational research to policy and practice: Constructing, challenging, changing cognition. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 4–11, 22.
41.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
42.
SlavinR. E. (1989). PET and the pendulum: Faddism in education and how to stop it. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(10), 752–758.
43.
SmylieM. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1–30.
44.
SoodakL. C., & PodellD. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education referral. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 66–81.
45.
TushnetN. C. (1992, April). Synthesis and translation: Will it be easier for users to discover meaning, truth, and utility in research? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.(ERIC Document ED 344 923).
46.
TylerR. W. (1988). Utilization of research by practitioners in education. In JacksonP. W. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
47.
VerstappenP. (1991). Easier theorized than done: Five papers on the systematic cooperation between theory and practice. Unpublished manuscript, Instituut voor Leerplanontwikkeling, Enschede (Netherlands) (ERIC Document ED 344 731).
48.
WasleyP. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
WilsonA. J., & SilvermanH. (1991). Teachers' assumptions and beliefs about the delivery of services to exceptional children. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(3), 198–206.
