This 1-year-long study investigated the use of isolation timeout as a behavioral control intervention in a special educational facility. Subjects were 156 students with emotional disturbance. The relationship of timeout to demographic variables was examined for a subsample of 73 students. Results indicate that 13,000 separate timeouts occurred over the academic year. Average time in isolation was 23 hr per student. Older students in more restrictive placements were found to spend significantly more time in isolation than were other groups, though much of this difference was due to voluntary timeouts. Alternatives to timeout as a behavior control measure are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd. ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd rev. ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BaconE. (1990). Using negative consequences effectively. Academic Therapy, 25, 599–611.
5.
BrantnerJ. P., & DohertyM. A. (1983). A review of time-out: A conceptual and methodological analysis. In AxelrodS. & ApocheJ. (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior (pp. 87–132). New York: Academic Press.
6.
BurchardJ., & TylerV. (1965). The modification of delinquent behavior through operant conditioning. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2, 245–250.
7.
CrespiT. (1988). Effectiveness of time-out: A comparison of psychiatric, correctional and day-treatment programs. Adolescence, 23, 805–811.
8.
DrabmanR. S., & SpitalnikR. (1973). Social isolation as a punishment procedure: A controlled study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16, 236–249.
9.
GallagherM. M.MittelstadtP. A., & SlaterB. R. (1988). Establishing time-out procedures in a day treatment facility for young children. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 5, 59–68.
10.
GardG. C., & BerryK. K. (1986). Oppositional children: Taming tyrants. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 148–158.
11.
GastD. L., & NelsonC. M. (1977). Legal and ethical considerations for the use of timeout in special education settings. Journal of Special Education, 11, 457–467.
12.
GelfandD. M., & HartmannD. P. (1986). Child behavior analysis and therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
13.
GrosenickJ. K.GeorgeM. P., & GeorgeN. (1987). A profile of school programs for the behaviorally disordered: Twenty years after Morse, Cutler, and Fink. Behavior Disorders, 12, 159–168.
14.
HarrisK. (1985). Definitional, parametric and procedural considerations in timeout interventions and research. Exceptional Children, 51, 279–288.
15.
MacDonoughT. S., & ForehandR. (1973). Response contingent timeout: Important parameters in behavior modification with children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 4, 231–236.
16.
MayJ. G.RisleyT. R.TwardosgS.FriedmanP.ByouS. W., & WexlerD. (1975). Guidelines for the use of behavioral procedures in state programs for the retarded. Arlington, TX: National Association for Retarded Citizens, Research Advisory Committee.
17.
MillerD. E. (1986). The management of misbehavior by seclusion. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 4, 63–73.
18.
NelsonD. M., & RutherfordR. B. (1983). Timeout revisited: Guidelines for its use in special education. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 3, 56–67.
19.
New York State Education Department. (1992). Part 200 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. Albany: Author.
20.
OlsenJ. (1982). Treatment perspectives. In AlgozzineB. (Ed.), Problem behavior management educator's resource service (pp. 2:1–2:118). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
21.
PolsgroveL. (1982). Return to baseline: Some comments on Smith's reinterpretation of seclusionary timeout. Behavioral Disorders, 8, 50–52.
22.
PolsgroveL. (1991). Reducing undesirable behaviors. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
23.
RedlF. & WinemanD. (1952). Controls from within: Techniques for the treatment of the aggressive child. New York: Free Press.
RutherfordR. (1978). Theory and research on the use of aversive procedures in the education of behaviorally disordered and emotionally disturbed children and youth. In WoodF. & LankinK. C. (Eds.), Punishment and aversive stimulation in special education (pp. 41–64). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
26.
SachsD. A. (1973). The efficacy of time-out procedures in a variety of behavior problems. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 4, 237–242.
27.
ShapiroE. S., & LentzF. E. (1985). A survey of school psychologists' use of behavior modification procedures. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 327–336.
28.
SkibaR., & RaisonJ. (1990). Relationship between the use of timeout and academic achievement. Exceptional Children, 57, 36–46.
29.
ToppingK. J. (1983). Disruptive adolescents in the school system: Comparative effectiveness of helping strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 6, 359–371.
30.
TylerV., & BrownG. (1967). The use of swift, brief isolation as a group control device for institutionalized delinquents. Behavior Research and Therapy, 5, 1–9.
31.
ZabelM. K. (1986). Timeout use with behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 12, 15–21.
