To explicate the competence of skilled deaf readers, this study compared groups of high- and average-ability, secondary-level, deaf readers on five indicators of cognitive processes used during reading. Two indicators focused on fluency in processing visual information; three measured readers' application of higher-level processes. Results indicated significant differences between the groups on the measures of fluency. However, intergroup similarities on the indexes of higher-level processing suggest that these components do not determine the reading superiority of the skilled readers. The findings suggest that whole language instructional practices, increasingly popular in deaf education, need to address the development of processing fluency in deaf readers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronsonD., & FerresS. (1984). Reading strategies for children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 189–220.
2.
AbramsM. (Ed.). (1991). Whole language: A folio of articles from Perspectives in Education and Deafness. Washington, DC: Pre-College Programs, Gallaudet University.
3.
AllingtonR. L. (1980). Poor readers don't get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57, 872–876.
4.
BelmontJ.KarchmerM., & BourgJ. (1983). Structural influences on deaf and hearing children's recall of temporal/spatial incongruent letter strings. Educational Psychology, 3, 259–274.
5.
BelmontJ.KarchmerM., & PilkonisP. (1976). Instructed rehearsal strategies' influence on deaf memory processing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 36–46.
6.
BerentG. P. (1988). An assessment of syntactic capabilities. In StrongMichael (Ed.), Language, learning, and deafness (pp. 133–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BergeronB. (1990). What does the term whole language mean? Constructing a definition from the literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(4), 301–329.
8.
BowerG.BlackJ., & TurnerT. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.
9.
CarpenterP., & JustM. (1981). Cognitive processes in reading: Models based on readers' eye fixations. In LesgoldA. & PerfettiC. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 177–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
10.
Center for Assessment and Demographic Studies. (1991). Stanford achievement test, eighth edition: Hearing-impaired norms booklet. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
11.
ClayM. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12.
The College Board. (1986). Degrees of reading power. New York: Author.
13.
ConradR. (1979). The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.
14.
CrossD., & ParisS. (1987). Assessment of reading comprehension: Matching test purposes and test properties. Educational Psychologist, 22, 313–332.
15.
DanemanM., & CarpenterP. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–456.
16.
DolmanD. (1992). Some concerns about using whole language approaches with deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 137(3), 278–282.
17.
DolnickE. (1993). Deafness as culture. The Atlantic Monthly, 272(3), 37–53.
18.
EdelskyC. (1990). Whose agenda is this anyway? A response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 7–11.
19.
EwoldtC. (1981). A psycholinguistic description of selected deaf children reading in sign language. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 58–89.
20.
FischerB., & GlanzerM. (1986). Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 431–460.
GarnerR. (1988). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23.
GlanzerM.FischerB., & DorfmanD. (1984). Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 467–486.
24.
GoodmanK. (1968). The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
25.
GoodmanK. (1979). The know-more and the know-nothing movements in reading: A personal response. Language Arts, 56, 657–663.
26.
GoodmanK. (1987). Beyond basal readers: Taking charge of your own teaching. Learning, 16, 63–65.
27.
GoodmanK. (1989). Whole language research: Foundations and development. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 207–221.
28.
GormleyK. (1981). On the influence of familiarity on deaf students' text recall. American Annals of the Deaf, 126, 1024–1030.
29.
HaberlandtK. (1984). Components of sentence and word reading times. In KierasD. & JustM. (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 219–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
HansonV. (1990). Recall of order information by deaf signers: Phonetic coding in temporal order recall. Memory and Cognition, 18(6), 604–610.
31.
HansonV., & FowlerC. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory and Cognition, 15, 199–207.
32.
HansonV.GoodellE. W., & PerfettiC. (1991). Tongue-twister effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf college students. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 319–330.
33.
HansonV., & LichtensteinE. (1990). Short-term memory coding by deaf signers: The primary language coding hypothesis reconsidered. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 211–224.
34.
IsraeliteN. (1981). Direct antecedent context and comprehension of reversible passive voice sentences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
35.
Jager-AdamsM. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Urbana: Center for the Study of Reading, The Reading Research and Education Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
36.
JustM.CarpenterP., & WoolleyJ. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.
37.
KellyL. (1993). Recall of English function words and inflections by skilled and average deaf readers. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(3), 288–296.
38.
KingC., & QuigleyS. (1985). Reading and deafness. San Diego: College Hill Press.
39.
LaBergeD., & SamuelsS. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
40.
LaSassoC. (1987). Survey of reading instruction for hearing-impaired students in the United States. The Volta Review, 89, 85–98.
41.
LaSassoC., & DaveyB. (1987). The relationship between lexical knowledge and reading comprehension for prelingually profoundly hearing impaired students. Volta Review, 89, 211–220.
42.
LichtensteinE. H. (1983). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf college students: Parts I and II. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Communication Program.
43.
McNeilJ. (1984). Reading comprehension: New directions for classroom practice. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
44.
MooresD.KluwinT.JohnsonR.CoxP.BlennerhassettL.KellyL.EwoldtC.SweetC., & FieldsL. (1987). Factors predictive of literacy in deaf adolescents. (Project No. NIH-NINCDS-83-19. Final Report to National Institute of Handicapped Children and Communicative Disorders and Stroke.) Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
45.
PearsonD. (1989). Reading the whole-language movement. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 231–241.
46.
PerfettiC. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
PinnellG. S. (1989). Reading recovery: Helping at-risk children learn to read. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 161–183.
48.
PowerD., & QuigleyS. (1973). Deaf children's acquisition of the passive voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 5–11.
49.
Pre-College Programs. (1991). Carrying out our national mission: Pre-College Programs annual report. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
50.
QuigleyS., & KingC. (1980). Syntactic performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(4), 329–356.
QuigleyS.WilburR.PowerD.MontanelliD., & SteinkampM. (1976). Syntactic structure in the language of deaf children. Urbana: University of Illinois, Institute for Child Behavior and Development.
53.
QuinnL. (1981). Reading skills of hearing and congenitally deaf children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32(1), 139–161.
54.
RobbinsN., & HatcherC. (1981, February-March). The effects of syntax on the reading of hearing impaired children. Volta Review, 83, 105–115.
55.
RumelhartD. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In DornicS. (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
SchmittP. (1968). Deaf children's comprehension and production of sentence transformations and verb tenses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
57.
ScholesR.CohenM., & BrumfieldS. (1978). Some possible causes of syntactic deficits in the congenitally deaf English user. American Annals of the Deaf, 123(5), 528–535.
58.
ShankweilerD., & CrainS. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorders: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139–168.
59.
ShapiroH. (1992). Debatable issues underlying whole-language philosophy: A speech-language pathologist's perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 308–311.
60.
ShewhartW. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
61.
SpilichG.VesonderG.ChiesiH., & VossJ. (1979). Text processing of domain related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290.
62.
StanovichK. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
63.
StrassmanB.KretschmerR., & BilskyL. (1987). The instantiation of general terms by deaf adolescents/adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 1–13.
64.
VellutinoF. (1991). Introduction to three studies of reading acquisition: Convergent findings on the theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 437–443.
65.
WalkerC. (1987). Relative importance of domain knowledge and overall aptitude on acquisition of domain-related information. Cognition and Instruction, 4(1), 25–42.
66.
WilburR. (1977). An explanation of deaf children's difficulty with certain syntactic structures. Volta Review, 79(2), 85–92.
67.
YekovichF. R., & WalkerC. H. (1987). The activation of scripted knowledge in reading about routine activities. In BrittonB. & GlynnS. (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 145–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
