A growing number of concerned individuals throughout the world, including people with disabilities, their parents, and educators, are advocating that students with disabilities be educated in the mainstream of neighborhood classrooms and schools. However, some disability-rights advocates believe that if people with disabilities are to have a well-developed sense of identity as adults, they need to have had opportunities in their school years to associate with other people (both children and adults) having similar characteristics and interests. In this article, we examine this issue and provide one perspective on how it might be addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiklenD. (Ed.). (1985). Achieving the complete school. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BlackmanH. P. (1989). Special education placement. Is it what you know or where you live?Exceptional Children, 55, 459–462.
3.
BraatenS.KauffmanJ.BraatenB.PolsgroveL., & NelsonC. (1988). The regular education initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21–27.
4.
BranthwaiteA. (1985). The development of social identity and self-concept. In BranthwaiteA. & RogersD. (Eds.), Children growing up (pp. 34–42). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
5.
DavisW. (1988). The regular education initiative debate: Its promise and problems. Exceptional Children, 55, 440–449.
6.
Disability Rights, Education, and Defense Fund. (1983). The Disabled Women's Education Project: Report of survey/results: Executive summary. Berkeley, CA: Author.
7.
FergusonP., & AschA. (1989). Lessons from life: Personal and parental perspectives on school, childhood, and disability. In BiklenD.FergusonD., & FordA. (Eds.), Schooling and disability (pp. 108–140). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
8.
FullwoodD. (1990). Chances and choices. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
GliedmanJ., & RothW. (1980). The unexpected minority: Handicapped children in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
10.
HahnH. (1985). Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. The Social Science Journal, 22, 87–105.
11.
HahnH. (1989). The politics of special education. In LipskyD. & GartnerA. (Eds.), Beyond special education (pp. 225–242). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
KauffmanS. (1984). Socialization in sheltered workshop settings. In EdgertonR. & BercoviciS. (Eds.), Mental retardation (pp. 73–92). Washington, DC: American Association for Mental Deficiency.
13.
LiebermanL. (1985). Special and regular education: A merger made in heaven?Exceptional Children, 51, 513–517.
14.
LipskyD. & GartnerA. (1989). Beyond separate education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
MessingerJ. (1985). A commentary on “A rationale for merger of special and regular education.”Exceptional Children, 51, 510–513.
16.
People First. (1987). People first [Video]. Downsview, Ont.: Canadian Association for Community Living.
17.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1985). The merger of special and regular education: Can it be done?Exceptional Children, 51, 517–521.
18.
StainbackS.StainbackW., & ForestM. (Eds.). (1989). Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
20.
StrullyJ., & StrullyC. (1985). Friendship and our children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1, 224–227.
21.
VauxA. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger Press.
22.
WarrenE. (1954). Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. 347 U.S. 483, 493.
