This article examines the inclusive schools movement and compares it to that of the REI. After contrasting the movements' respective advocates, goals, tactics, and understanding of and links to general education, we argue that the field's rhetoric has become increasingly strident and its perspective increasingly insular and disassociated from general education's concerns. We offer a pessimistic prediction about the current movement's success in forging a productive alliance with general education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineB.ChristensonS., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1982). An analysis of the incidence of special class placement: The masses are burgeoning. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 141–147.
2.
AlgozzineB.MaheadyL.SaccaK. C.O'SheaL., & O'SheaD. (1990). Sometimes patent medicine works: A reply to Braaten, Kauffman, Braaten, Polsgrove, and Nelson. Exceptional Children, 56, 552–557.
3.
AllingtonR. L., & McGill-FranzenA. (1989). Different programs, indifferent instruction. In LipskyD. K. & GartnerA. (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education for all (pp. 75–97). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
4.
American Council on the Blind (n.d.). Full inclusion of students who are blind and visually impaired: A position statement. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Anderson-InmanL.WalkerH. M., & PurcellJ. (1984). Promoting the transfer of skills across settings: Transenvironmental programming for handicapped students in the mainstream. In HewardW. L.HeronT. E.HillD. S., & Trap-PorterJ. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 17–35). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6.
The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. (1992, July). CEC slips back; ASCD steps forward. TASH Newsletter, 18, 1.
7.
BachrachL. L. (1986). Deinstitutionalization: What do the numbers mean?Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 37, 118–119, 121.
8.
BakerJ., & ZigmondN. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?Exceptional Children, 56, 515–526.
9.
BehrmannJ. (1992). All must collaborate to serve children with disabilities. Counterpoint, 13, 1, 9.
10.
BellT. H. (1988). On the need for national leadership to make American education work. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 8–10.
11.
BiklenD. (1985). Achieving the complete school. New York: Teachers College.
12.
BiklenD.LehrS.SearlS. J., & TaylorS. J. (1987). Purposeful integration … inherently equal [Manual prepared by the Center on Human Policy, Syracuse University.] (Available from Technical Assistance for Parent Programs Project, 312 Stuart Street, Boston, MA 02116).
13.
The Board of Education for the City of Toronto. (1989). A report to the Minister of Education on the provision of special education programs and special education services for the city of Toronto. Toronto: Author.
14.
BraatenS.KauffmanJ. M.BraatenB.PolsgroveL., & NelsonC. M. (1988). The Regular Education Initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21–27.
15.
BrownL.Branston-McCleanM.BaumgartD.VincentL.FalveyM., & SchroederJ. (1979). Using the characteristics of current and subsequent least restrictive environments in the development of curricular content for severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 4, 407–424.
16.
BrownL.SchwarzP.Udvari-SolnerA.KampschroerE.JohnsonF.JorgensenJ., & GruenewaldL. (1991). How much time should students with severe intellectual disabilities spend in regular classrooms and elsewhere?JASH, 16, 39–47.
17.
ButtramJ. L., & KershnerK. M. (1988). Special education in America's cities: A descriptive study. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 187).
18.
California Research Institute. (1990). Strategies on the integration of students with severe disabilities. TASH Newsletter, 16, pp. 1–4 (inset).
19.
Carnegie Council for Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 322).
20.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 268 120).
21.
ChaikindS.DanielsonL. C., & BrauenM. L. (1993). What do we know about the costs of special education? A selected review. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 344–370.
22.
ChiraS. (1993, May 19). When disabled students enter regular classrooms. The New York Times, pp. 1, 17.
23.
CoatesR. D. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative and opinions of regular classroom teachers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 532–536.
24.
Commission on the Education of the Deaf. (1988, February). Toward equality: Education of the deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 932).
25.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1992, March). Special education and school restructuring. Concerns, 35, 1–7.
26.
The Council for Exceptional Children. (1993, April). Statement on inclusive schools and communities. Reston, VA: Author.
27.
De WittK. (1991, May 12). How best to teach the blind: A growing battle over braille. The New York Times, pp. 1, 12.
28.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 34, 5–22.
29.
Excerpts from text of education-related planks in Republican party platform. (1992). The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(2), 32–33.
30.
FeatherstoneJ. (1971). Schools where children learn. New York: Liveright.
31.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1991). Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists versus conservationists. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 241–255). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
32.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S., & FernstromP. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 149–177.
33.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD., & BishopN. (1992). Teacher planning for students with learning disabilities: Differences between general arid special educators. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 120–128.
34.
GartnerA., & LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.
35.
GerstenR., & WoodwardJ. (1990). Rethinking the Regular Education Initiative: Focus on the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 7–16.
36.
GiangrecoM. F.DennisR.CloningerC.EdelmanS., & SchattmanR. (1993). “I've counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
37.
GottliebJ.AlterM., & GottliebB. W. (1991). Mainstreaming academically handicapped children in urban schools. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 95–112). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
38.
HalesR. M., & CarlsonL. B. (1992). Issues and trends in special education. Lexington: Federal Resource Center for Special Education, University of Kentucky. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 753).
39.
HallahanD. P.KellerC. E.McKinneyJ. D.LloydJ. W., & BryanT. (1988). Examining the research base of the Regular Education Initiative: Efficacy studies and the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29–35.
40.
HellerK. A.HoltzmanW. H., & MessickS. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
41.
HiltsP. J. (1990, September 12). U.S. care of mentally ill is assailed in a report. The New York Times, p. 14.
42.
Holmes Group. (1986, April). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
43.
HouckC. K., & RogersC. (in press). The special/general education initiative for students with specific learning disabilities: Program status and input. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
44.
JenkinsJ. R.PiousC. G., & PetersonD. L. (1988). Categorical programs for remedial and handicapped students: Issues of validity. Exceptional Children, 55, 147–158.
45.
KauffmanJ. M. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard to teach. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 256–278.
46.
KauffmanJ. M. (1991). Restructuring in sociopolitical context: Reservations about the effects of current reform proposals on students with disabilities. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 57–66). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
47.
KauffmanJ. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6–16.
48.
KauffmanJ. M.GerberM. M., & SemmelM. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 6–11.
49.
KeoghB. K. (1988a). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 19–22.
50.
KeoghB. K., (1988b). Perspectives on the Regular Education Initiative. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 3–5.
51.
KnoffH. M. (1985). Attitudes toward mainstreaming: A status report and comparison of regular and special educators in New York and Massachusetts. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 411–418.
52.
KukicS. (1993, March). Report on the development of a national agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with disabilities. Paper presented at a meeting of the CEC President's Panel on Reform and Integration in Special Education, Logan, Utah.
53.
Learning Disabilities Association. (1993, January). Position paper on full inclusion of all students with learning disabilities in the regular education classroom. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
54.
LeibermanL. M. (1985). Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven?Exceptional Children, 51, 513–516.
55.
LeibermanL. M. (1992). Preserving special education … for those who need it. In StainbackW. & StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 13–25). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
LillyM. S. (1987). Lack of focus on special education in literature on educational reform. Exceptional Children, 53, 325–326.
57.
LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
58.
LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (1991). Restructuring for quality. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 43–56). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
59.
McGill-FranzenA. (1987). Failure to learn to read: Formulating a policy problem. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 475–490.
60.
McIntoshR.VaughnS.SchummJ. S.HaagerD., & LeeO. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Chidren, 60, 249–261.
61.
McKinneyJ. D., & HocuttA. M. (1988). Policy issues in the evaluation of the Regular Education Initiative. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 15–23.
62.
McLaughlinM., & WarrenS. (n.d.). The restructuring of special education. Unpublished document. College Park, MD: The Center for Policy Options in Special Education, University of Maryland.
63.
McLaughlinM., & WarrenS. (1992, September). Issues and options in restructuring schools and special education programs. College Park, MD: The Center for Policy Options in Special Education, University of Maryland. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 774).
64.
MegivernK. (1987). The war within. Yearbook of the Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired, 5, 29–32.
65.
Michigan Department of Education and State Board of Education. (1992, February). Inclusive education: Position statement. Lansing, MI: Author.
66.
MillerL. (1990). The Regular Education Initiative and school reform: Lessons from the mainstream. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 17–22.
67.
MyersD. A. (1974). Why open education died. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 8, 60–67.
68.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992, October). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Washington, DC: Author.
69.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983, April). A nation at risk: The imperative of educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
70.
National Council on Disability. (1989, September). The education of students with disabilities: Where do we stand?Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 961).
71.
National Education Association. (1992). Resolution B-20: Education for all students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
72.
National Governors' Association. (1986). Time for results. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 279 609).
73.
The National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1993, January). A reaction to “full inclusion”: A reaffirmation of the right of students with learning disabilities to a continuum of services. Author.
74.
New Mexico State Department of Education. (1991). Administrative policy on full inclusion. Santa Fe, NM: Author.
75.
OakesJ., & LiptonM. (1992). Detracking schools: Early lessons from the field. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 448–454.
76.
PearpointJ., & ForestM. (1992). Foreword. In StainbackS. & StainbackW. (Eds.), Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students (pp. xv–xviii). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
PetersonP. L., & ClarkC. M. (1978). Teachers' reports of their cognitive process during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 417–432.
79.
PinnellG. S.DeFordD. E., & LyonsC. A. (1988). Reading recovery: Early intervention for at-risk first graders. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 790).
80.
PugachM., & LillyS. M. (1984). Reconceptualizing support services for classroom teachers: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 48–55.
81.
PugachM., & Sapon-ShevinM. (1987). New agendas for special education policy: What the national reports haven't said. Exceptional Children, 53, 295–299.
82.
RathboneC. H. (1971). The implicit rationale of the open education classroom. In RathboneC. H. (Ed.), Open education: The informal classroom (pp. 99–116). New York: Citation.
83.
ReynoldsM. C. (1988). Reaction to the JLD special series on the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 352–356.
84.
ReynoldsM. C. (1989). An historical perspective: The delivery of special education to mildly disabled and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 7–11.
85.
ReynoldsM. C. (1991). Classification and labeling. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 29–41). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
86.
ReynoldsM. C., & BirchJ. W. (1977). Teaching exceptional children in all America's schools. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
87.
ReynoldsM. C.WangM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
88.
ReynoldsM. C.ZetlinA. G., & WangM. C. (1993). 20/20 analysis: Taking a close look at the margins. Exceptional Children, 59, 294–300.
89.
SacksO. (1991, February 13). Forsaking the mentally ill. The New York Times (OpEd), p. 23.
90.
Sapon-ShevinM. (1987). The national education reports and special education: Implications for students. Exceptional Children, 53, 300–306.
91.
SemmelM. I.AbernathyT. V.ButeraG., & LesarS. (1991). Teacher perceptions of the Regular Education Initiative. Exceptional Children, 58, 9–23.
92.
ShankerA. (1993, May 30). Where we stand: Opportunity to learn. The New York Times, p. E-7.
93.
SingerJ. D. (1988). Should special education merge with regular education?Educational Policy, 2, 409–424.
94.
SingerJ. D. (1993). Once is not enough: Former special educators who return to teaching. Exceptional Children, 60, 58–72.
95.
SingerJ. D., & ButlerJ. B. (1987). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Schools as agents of social reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 125–152.
96.
SkrticT. (1987). Preconditions for merger: An organizational analysis of special education reform. In SemmelM., (Chair), Prenuptial agreements necessary for wedding special education and general education. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 291 177).
97.
SlavinR. E. (1984). Team Assisted Individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 33–42.
98.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A.KarweitN. L.DolanL.WasikB. A.ShawA.MainzerK. L., & HaxbyB. (1991). Neverstreaming: Prevention and early intervention as an alternative to special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 373–378.
99.
SlavinR. E., & StevensR. J. (1991). Cooperative learning and mainstreaming. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 177–191). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
100.
SnellM. E. (1988). Gartner and Lipsky's “Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students.”Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 137–140.
101.
SnellM. E. (1991). Schools are for all kids: The importance of integration for students with severe disabilities and their peers. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 133–148). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
102.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1985). Integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 255 009).
103.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
104.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
105.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1991). Rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 225–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
106.
StainbackW.StainbackS., & MoravecJ. (1992). Using curriculum to build inclusive classrooms. In StainbackS. & StainbackW. (Eds.), Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students (pp. 65–84). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
107.
StephensT. M., & BraunB. J. (1980). Measures of regular classroom teachers' attitudes toward handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 46, 292–294.
108.
StevensR. J.MaddenN. A.SlavinR. E., & FarnishA. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433–454.
109.
TaylorS. J. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 41–53.
110.
ThousandJ. S., & VillaR. A. (1990). Strategies for educating learners with severe disabilities within their local home schools and communities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1–24.
111.
U.S. Department of Education, Special Education Programs. (1992). Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 779).
112.
VergasonG. A., & AndereggM. L. (1989). Save the baby! A response to “Integrating the children of the second system.”Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 61–63.
113.
WalkerH. M., & BullisM. (1991). Behavior disorders and the social context of regular class integration: A conceptual dilemma? In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 75–93). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
114.
WangM. C. (1980). Adaptive instruction: Building on diversity. Theory Into Practice, 19, 122–128.
115.
WangM. C. (1981). Mainstreaming exceptional children: Some instructional design and implementation considerations. Elementary School Journal81, 195–221.
116.
WangM. C. (1987). Toward achieving educational excellence for all students: Program design and student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 25–34.
117.
WangM. C., & BirchJ. W. (1984). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room approach. Exceptional Children, 51, 33–40.
118.
WangM. C., & ReynoldsM. C. (1985). Avoiding the “Catch 22” in special education reform. Exceptional Children, 51, 497–502.
119.
WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon.
120.
WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 248–251.
121.
WangM. C.RubensteinJ. L., & ReynoldsM. C. (1985). Clearing the road to success for students with special needs. Educational Leadership, 43, 62–67.
122.
WangM. C., & WalbergH. J. (1988). Four fallacies of segregationism. Exceptional Children, 55, 128–137.
123.
WeberL. (1971). The English Infant School and informal education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
124.
WillM. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
125.
YorkJ., & VandercookT. (1991). Designing an integrated program for learners with severe disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 23, 22–28.
126.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB., & EppsS. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practice in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.
