Self-determination refers to the ability to consider options and make appropriate choices in the home, at school, at work, and during leisure time. A growing philosophical and legal base supports full participation of persons with disabilities in natural settings in the community, and empirical studies document the abilities of persons with severe and multiple disabilities to learn to make choices. Follow-up studies indicate that the majority of special education graduates have not made a successful transition from school to life as an adult in the community. Many remain underemployed or unemployed for reasons associated with lack of decision-making skills. This article presents a rationale for including self-determination in special education curricula. The article describes a framework for providing choices, based on an analysis of risk and benefits. Assessment approaches and teaching strategies are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlperS.SchlossP. J., & SchlossC. N. (in press). Families of persons with disabilities: Consultation and advocacy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
BenzM., & HalpernM. (1987). Transition services for secondary students with mild disabilities: A statewide perspective. Exceptional Children, 53, 507–514.
3.
BlattB. (1987). The community imperative and human values. In AntonakR. F. & MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Transition in mental retardation: The community imperative revisited (pp. 236–247). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
BrowderD. M. (1987). Assessment of individuals with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
BrownL.LongE.Udvari-SolnerA.DavisL.VanDeventerP.AhlgrenC.JohnsonF.GruenewaldL., & JorgensenJ. (1989). The home school: Why students with severe intellectual disabilities must attend the schools of their brothers, sisters, friends, and neighbors. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14(1), 1–7.
6.
CobbH. (1973). Citizen advocacy and the rights of the handicapped. In WolfensbergerW. & ZauhaH. (Eds.), Citizen advocacy and protective services for the impaired and handicapped (pp. 149–161). Toronto, Canada: MacDonald-Downie.
7.
DattiloJ., & RuschF. (1985). Effects of choice on leisure participation for persons with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 194–199.
8.
GardnerW. I. (1977). Learning and behavioral characteristics of exceptional children and youth: A humanistic behavioral approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
GoodeD. A., & GaddyM. R. (1976). Ascertaining choice with alingual, deaf-blind and retarded clients. Mental Retardation, 14, 10–12.
10.
GrossmanH. J. (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
11.
Harris, L., & Associates, Inc. (1986). A nationwide survey of 1,000 disabled people. (Study No. 854–009). New York: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 278189).
12.
HasaziS. B.GordonL. R., & RoeC. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979–1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
13.
JohnsonC. (1988, October). Reauthorization of the Carl D. Perkins Vocational Education Act. Paper presented at the Missouri LINC: Vocational Special Needs Fall Conference, Columbia, MO.
14.
KaminerR. K., & JedrysekE. (1987). Risk in the lives of children and adolescents who are mentally retarded: Implication for families and professionals. In AntonakR. F. & MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Transitions in mental retardation: The community imperative revisited (pp. 72–88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
KishiG.TeelucksinghB.ZollersN.Park-LeeS., & MeyerL. (1988). Daily decision-making in community residences: A social comparison of adults with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 430–435.
16.
KoegelR. L.DyerK., & BellL. K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.
17.
LelandH. W. (1978). Theoretical considerations of adaptive behavior. In CoulterW. A. & MorrowH. W. (Eds.), Adaptive behavior: Concepts and measurements (pp. 1–80). New York: Grune & Stratton.
18.
MannL.HarmoniR., & PowerC. (1989). Adolescent decision-making: The development of competence. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 265–278.
19.
MercerJ. R. (1972). Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
NeelR. S.MeadowsN.LevineP., & EdgarE. (1988). What happens after special education: A statewide follow-up study of secondary students who have behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 13(3), 209–216.
21.
O'BrienJ. (1987). A guide to life-style planning: Using the activity catalog to integrate services and natural systems. In WilcoxB. & BellamyG. T. (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to the activities catalog: An alternative curriculum for youth and adults with severe disabilities (pp. 175–189). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
ParsonsM. B., & ReidD. H. (1990). Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: Providing opportunities to make choices. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 183–195.
23.
PerskeR. (1972). The dignity of risk. In WolfensbergerW. (Ed.), Normalization (pp. 194–200). Toronto, Canada: Leonard Crainford.
24.
RealonR. E.FavellJ. E., & LowerreA. (1990). The effects of making choices on engagement levels with persons who are profoundly multiply handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 299–305.
25.
RosenM. (1972, October). Psychosexual adjustment of the mentally handicapped. In BassM. S. (Ed.), Sexual rights and responsibilities of the mentally retarded. Proceedings of the conference of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Region IX, Newark, Delaware.
26.
SattlerJ. (1974). Assessment of children's intelligence. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
27.
SchlossP. J.HughesC. A. & SmithM. A. (1989). Mental retardation: Community transition. Boston, MA: College Hill/Little Brown.
28.
SchlossP. J., & SedlakR. A. (1986). Instructional methods for students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
SchlossP. J.WoodC. E., & SchlossC. N. (1987). Financial disincentives to full-time employment for persons with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 54, 272–277.
30.
StainbackS.StainbackW., & ForestM. (1989). Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
31.
WagnerM. (1989). The transition experience of youth with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. San Francisco: Division of Research, The Council for Exceptional Children.
32.
WalshK. K., & McCallionP. (1987). The role of the small institution in the community service continuum. In AntonakR. F. & MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Transition in mental retardation: The community imperative revisited (pp. 216–236). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: Leonard Crainford.
34.
ZetlinA. G., & GallimoreR. (1980). A cognitive skills training program for moderately retarded learners. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 121–123.
35.
ZetlinA. G., & GallimoreR. (1983). The development of comprehension strategies through the regulatory function of teacher questions. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18(3), 176–184.
