African-American students who fail in school programs are presumed to have a “low” self-concept. However, this view fails to recognize self-concept as an observable, describable, situation-specific, and measurable phenomenon. In addition, it ignores the cultural biases and prejudices inherent in current self-concept assessment tools. In contrast, the operational model of self-concept, which defines self-descriptive behavior, permits identification of styles, strengths, and weaknesses in the areas of self-concept. The article explores methods for enhancing self-concepts of African-American students and accommodating multicultural perspectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlawiyeO. (1986). The self-concept of children, and the perceptions of parents and teachers from schools in Ghana and Gambia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
2.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (1987). Minority teacher recruitment and retention: A public policy issue. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AnastasiA. (1958). Differential psychology (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan.
4.
BanksJ. A. (1991). Multicultural education: For freedom's sake. Educational Leadership, 49(4), 22–35.
5.
BarkerN. C., & ObiakorF. E. (1992). Educating the Black male: Renewed imperatives for Black and White communities. Scholar and Educator: The Journal of the Society of Educators and Scholars, 15(2), 16–31.
6.
CalhounG., & ElliotR. W. (1977). Self-concept and academic achievement of educable retarded and emotionally disturbed pupils. Exceptional Children, 43, 479–480.
7.
CanfieldJ., & WellsH. C. (1976). 100 ways to enhance self-concept in the classroom: A handbook for teachers and parents. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
ChapmanJ. W., & BoersmaF. J. (1979, April). Self-perceptions of ability, expectations and locus of control in elementary learning disabled children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 169 738).
9.
ClarkK. B., & ClarkM. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In New-CombT. M. & HartleyE. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt.
10.
FittsW. H. (1972). The self-concept and performance. Nashville, TN: The Dede Wallace Center.
11.
GouldS. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
12.
HarterS. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.
13.
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
14.
HarterS. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In SulsJ. & GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the selfVol. 3 (pp. 139–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
HerrnsteinR. (1971, September). I. Q. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 43–64.
16.
HilliardA. G. (1989, December). Cultural style in teaching and learning. The Education Digest, pp. 21–23.
17.
HogeR. D., & McSheffreyR. (1991). An investigation of self-concept in gifted children. Exceptional Children, 57, 238–245.
18.
HrabaJ., & GrantG. (1970). Black is beautiful: A reexamination of racial preference and identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 398–402.
19.
JensenA. (1973). The differences are real. Psychology Today, 7(7), 80–86.
20.
JensenA. (1985). Compensatory education and the theory of intelligence. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(8), 559–564.
21.
KinchJ. W. (1963). A formalized theory of self-concept. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 481–486.
LawrenceE. A., & WinchellJ. (1973). Self-concept and the retarded: Research and issues. Exceptional Children, 39, 310–319.
24.
LewinK. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
25.
MabryM., & RogersP. (1991, August). Bias begins at home: A disturbing study about Black self-image. Newsweek, p. 33.
26.
MahoneyN. W. (1990, August 1). Self-pity can be a deadly habit. Chattanooga News-Free Press Plus, p. A7.
27.
MarableM. (1990, February). Violence and crime in the Black community: Part two of a two part series. Jackson Advocate, 51(19), 5A.
28.
MarshH. W. (1988). The Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ): A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
29.
MarshH. W., & HolmesI. W. M. (1990). Multidimensional self-concepts: Construct validation of responses by children. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 89–117.
30.
MarshH. W., & ShavelsonR. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.
31.
McDavidJ. W., & GarwoodS. G. (1978). Understanding children: Promoting human growth. Toronto, Canada: D. C. Heath.
32.
MintonH. L., & SchneiderF. W. (1980). Differential psychology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
33.
MullerD. (1978). Self-concept: A new alternative for education. College of Education Dialogue Series Monograph. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 165 067).
34.
MullerD.ChamblissJ., & MullerA. (1983, March). Making self-concept a relevant education concern. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Houston, TX.
35.
MullerD.LamedD.LeonettiR., & MullerA. (1984). The Student's Self-Assessment Inventory: General Form. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
36.
MullerD.LarnedD.LeonettiR., & MullerA. (1986). The Student's Self-Assessment Inventory: Visually Impaired Form. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
37.
ObiakorF. E. (1990). Development of self-concept: Impact on students' learning. SAEOPP Journal: The Journal of the Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel, 9(1), 16–23.
38.
ObiakorF. E. (1991a, April). African-American quandaries in school programs. Paper presented at the general meeting of the National Black Caucus of Special Educators, Council for Exceptional Children, Atlanta.
39.
ObiakorF. E. (1991b). Self-concept: Impact on Black students' learning. SENGA, 1(2), 48–53.
40.
ObiakorF. E. (1992, February). Multiculturalism in higher education: A myth or reality? Paper presented at the Multicultural Fair, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
41.
ObiakorF. E., & AlawiyeO. (1990, October). Development of accurate self-concept in Black children. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Symposium on Culturally Diverse Exceptional Children, Albuquerque, NM.
42.
ObiakorF. E., & LassiterR. (1988). After the scholarship: Retention and academic achievement of Black students in White colleges. Minority Voices, 11(1), 22–23, 25.
43.
ObiakorF. E., & StileS. W. (1989). Enhancing self-concept in students with visual handicaps. The Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83(5), 255–257.
44.
ObiakorF. E., & StileS. W. (1990). The self-concepts of visually impaired and normally sighted middle school children. The Journal of Psychology, 124(2), 199–206.
45.
ObiakorF. E.StileS. W., & MullerD. (1988, March). The self-concept of the visually impaired: An area-specific model. Paper presented at the 66th Annual International Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), Washington, DC.
46.
OgbuJ. U. (1990a). Minority status and literacy in comparative perspective. Daedaus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 119(2), 141–168.
47.
OgbuJ. U. (1990b). Understanding diversity: Summary statements. Education and Urban Society, 22(4), 425–429.
48.
ParilloV. M. (1980). Strangers to these shores: Race and ethnic relations in the United States. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
49.
PietrofesaJ. J.SpleteH. H.HoffmanA., & PintoD. V. (1978). Counseling: Theory, research and practice. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
50.
PottebaumS. M.KeithT. Z., & EllyS. W. (1986). Is there a causal relation between self-concept and academic achievement?The Journal of Educational Research, 79(3), 140–144.
51.
PrincesC. W., & ObiakorF. E. (1990). Disabled students: An area-specific model. In VanderPutten J. J. (Ed.), Reaching new heights: Proceedings of the 1989 AHSSPPE conference (pp. 35–50). Madison, WI: Omni Press.
52.
PurkeyW. (1970). Self-concept and school achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
53.
RobbinsR. L., & HarawayN. I. (1977). Goal-setting and reactions to success and failure in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(6), 356–362.
54.
RogersC. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: The current practice implications and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
55.
RogersO., & DymondR. (1954). Psychotherapy and personality: Coordinated studies in the client-centered approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
RoyceJ. (1973). The present situation in theoretical psychology. In WolmanB. (Ed.), Handbook of general psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
SamudaR. J. (1975). Psychological testing of American minorities: Issues and consequences. New York: Harper & Row.
58.
ShockleyW. A. (1972, March). A debate challenge: Geneticity is 80% for White identical twins' IQs. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 415–519.
59.
StaplesR. (1984, March/April). Racial ideology and intellectual racism: Blacks in academics. The Black Scholar, pp. 2017.
60.
SteeleS. (1990, October 3). The “unseen agent” of low self-esteem. Education Week, p. 36.
61.
WilsonR. (1991, August). Intellectually and philosophically, we must divorce educational achievement from cultural affirmation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 37(47), B1–B3.
62.
WoodJ. W. (1984). Adapting instruction for the mainstream. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
63.
WrightB. A. (1960). Physical disability—A psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row.
64.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB., & ThurlowM. L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
