The extensive literature on the overrepresentation of adolescent African-American male learners in classes for students identified as behavior disordered has essentially not addressed the problems caused by teacher reactions to adolescent conversational language use, the qualitative differences in language choices, or the impact of the conversational choices of adolescents on their educational treatment. This article explores how the dramaturgical perspective of selected Theatre Rehearsal Technique (TRT) activities can be used as learning experiences in communication with this student population. If these students gain quantifiable success in their social communication interactions, reassessment of their special education placement might facilitate their entrance into less restrictive educational environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonM. G. (1985). “Hey Miss Gresham … That's not right!”: No room for blind faith in language education. English Language Arts Bulletin, 26(2), 21–23.
2.
AndersonM. G. (1989). Perceptions about the use of selected theatre rehearsal technique activities: Resources for socially emotionally disturbed adolescents. (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1989). Dissertation Abstract International, 50, 1622A.
3.
AnglinL. W.GoldmanR. M., & AnglinJ. S. (1982). Teaching: What it's all about. New York: Harper & Row.
4.
BenedettiR. L. (1981). The actor at work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BoltonG. M. (1984). Drama as education. Durham, England: Longman House.
6.
CameronK. M., & HoffmanT. J. C. (1969). The theatrical response. London: Macmillan.
7.
CazdenC. (1983). The peekaboo as an instructional mode. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 33–58). New York: Plenum Press.
8.
DespertJ. L. (1965). The emotionally disturbed child—Then and now. New York: Vantage Press.
9.
DittonJ. (1979). Contrology. London: Macmillan.
10.
EisnerE. W. (1992). The misunderstood role of the arts in human development. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(8), 591–595.
11.
GallagherP. A. (1988). Teaching students with behavior disorders (2nd ed.). Denver: Love.
12.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
13.
GoffmanE. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.
14.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction rituals: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.
15.
GreeneM. (1973). Teacher as stranger. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16.
HarrisA. (1983). Language and alienation. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 99–108). New York: Plenum Press.
17.
HymesD. (1983). Report from an underdeveloped country: Toward linguistic competence in the United States. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 189–224). New York: Plenum Press.
18.
JohnsonL., & O'NeillC. (1984). Dorothy Heathcote: Collected writings on education and drama. London: Hutchinson.
19.
KauffmanJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (1981). Handbook of special education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
KnitzerJ.SteinbergZ., & FleischF. (1990). At the schoolhouse door: An examination of the programs and policies for children with behavioral and emotional problems. New York: Bank Street College of Education.
LemkeJ. (1988). Genres, semantics, and classroom education. Linguistics and Education, 1, 81–99.
23.
LongD. H. (1984). Arthur Bestor on education of teachers. Educational Forum, 4(48), 423–448.
24.
LuriaA. R. (1967). The regulation function of speech in its development and dissolution. In SalzingerK. & SalzingerS. (Eds.), Research in verbal behavioral and some neurophysiological implications (pp. 405–422). New York: Academic Press.
25.
LyndallR. H. (1977). Behavior disorders and school: A case of sexism and racial bias. Behavior Disorders, 2(4), 201–204.
26.
McIntyreL. D., & PernellE. (1985). The impact of race on teacher recommendations for special education placement. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 13(3), 112–120.
27.
O'NeilC., & LambertA. (1987). Drama structures. London: Hutchinson Education.
28.
OsserH. (1983). Language as the instrument of school socialization: An examination of Bernstein's thesis. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 311–322). New York: Plenum Press.
29.
PruchaJ. (1983). Using language: A sociofunctional approach. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 287–295). New York: Plenum Press.
30.
RathsL. E.WassermannS.JonasA., & RothsteinA. L. (1986). Teaching for thinking. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
RhodesW. C., & PaulJ. L. (1978). Emotionally disturbed and deviant children: New views and approaches. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
RothwellJ. L. (1982). Telling it like it isn't. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34.
SmithP. M.GilesH., & HewstoneM. (1983). New horizons in the study of speech and social situations. In BainB. (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct (pp. 297–310). New York: Plenum Press.
35.
StromR. D. (1973). Education for affective achievement. London: Rand McNally.
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). To assure the free appropriate public education of all handicapped children. 12th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
WayB. (1967). Development through drama. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
38.
WoodB. S. (1976). Children and communication: Verbal and non-verbal language development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
