Strategy Usage among Deaf and Hearing Readers

Abstract

High school youths who were prelingually and profoundly deaf hearing elementary-school-age youths, and hearing reading-disabled high school youths read expository texts and filled in deleted words and phrases. After making word replacements, they explained their decisions in sign or verbally. As expected, the hearing youths had an easier time filling in the deleted portions and explaining what strategies they were using. While the deaf youths reported using similar strategies as the hearing youths, the frequency of each type of strategy differed. Deaf readers more often relied on rereading and background knowledge, while the hearing readers made greater use of context clues. The results suggest that instruction for deaf readers should include more effective comprehension strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afflerback

, & Johnston

(1984). Research methodology on the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 307–322.

American National Standards Institute. (1969). American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI 53.6–1969). New York: American National Standards Institute.

Baker

, & Brown

(1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In Pearson

(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.

Conrad

(1979). The deaf school child: Language and cognitive function. London: Harper & Row.

Ericsson

, & Simon

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–249.

Ewoldt

(1977). A psycholinguistic description of selected deaf children reading in sign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.

Garner

(1982). Verbal-report data on reading strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 159–167.

Houghton Mifflin Reading Program (1981). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

LaSasso

(1978). An investigation of the validity and reliability of the cloze procedure as a measure of readability and comprehension for prelingually, profoundly deaf students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.

10.

Lichtenstein

(1984). Deaf working memory processes and English language skills. In Martin

(Ed.), Cognition, education and deafness (pp. 111–114). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

11.

Marshall

(1970). Contextual constraint on deaf and hearing children. American Annals of the Deaf, 115, 382–389.

12.

Moores

(1967). Applications of the “cloze” procedures to the assessment of psycholinguistic abilities of the deaf. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

13.

Moores

(1987). Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

14.

Quigley

, & Paul

(1984). Language and deafness. San Diego: College-Hill Press.

15.

Olshavsky

(1976–77). Reading as problem solving. An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12(4), 654–674.

16.

Palinscar

(1984). The quest for meaning from expository text: A teacher guided journey. In Duffy

Roehler

, & Mason

(Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 251–264). New York: Longman.

17.

Söderbergh

(1985). Early reading with deaf children. Prospects, 15(1), 77–84.

18.

Treiman

, & Hirsch-Pasek

(1983). Silent reading: Insights from second generation deaf readers. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 39–65.

19.

Wilbur

(1987). Reading and writing. In Cleve

(Ed.), Gallaudet encyclopedia of deaf people and deafness (pp. 146–151). New York: McGraw-Hill.