Direct Instruction in Math Word Problems: Students with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

This investigation was conducted to test the effectiveness of strategy teaching and sequencing practice problems in teaching students with learning disabilities to identify the correct algorithm for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Sixty-two students were assigned to one of three experimental groups: strategy plus sequence, strategy only, and sequence only. The results indicated that students in the strategy-plus-sequence group, as well as those in the strategy-only group, scored significantly higher than did students in the sequence-only group. Findings indicated that strategy teaching was the more effective of the two instructional components. Implications are discussed in terms of instructional design for students with learning disabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cawley

J. F.

Fitzmaurice

A. M.

Shaw

R. A.

Kahan

, & Bates

III . (1978). Mathematics and learning disabled youth: The upper grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1 (4), 37–52.

Cawley

J. F.

Fitzmaurice

A. M.

Shaw

R. A.

Kahan

, & Bates

III . (1979a). LD Youth and mathematics: A review of characteristics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(1), 29–44.

Cawley

J. F.

Fitzmaurice

A. M.

Shaw

R. A.

Kahan

& Bates

III . (1979b). Math word problems: Suggestions for LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(2), 25–40.

Cawley

J. F.

, & Goodman

J. D.

(1968). Interrelationships among mental abilities, reading, language arts and arithmetic with the mentally handicapped. The Arithmetic Teacher, 15, 631–636.

Cawley

J. F.

, & Goodman

J. D.

(1969). Arithmetic problem solving: A demonstration with the mentally handicapped. Exceptional Children, 36, 83–88.

Cawley

J. F.

Miller

, & School

B. A.

, (1987). A brief inquiry of arithmetic word-problem-solving among learning disabled secondary students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2, 87–93.

Darch

Carnine

, & Gersten

(1984). Explicit instruction in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 4, 155–165.

Englemann

S. E.

(1977). Sequencing cognitive and academic tasks. In Kneedler

R. D.

& Tarver

S. G.

(Eds.), Changing perspectives in special education (pp. 46–51). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Fleischner

, & O'Loughlin

(1985). Solving story problems: Implications of research for teaching the learning disabled. In Cawley

(Ed.), Cognitive strategies and mathematics for the learning disabled (pp. 163–182). Rockville, MD: Aspen.

10.

Jones

E. D.

Krouse

D. F.

Feorene

, & Saferstein

C. A.

(1985). A comparison of concurrent and sequential instruction of four types of verbal math problems. Remedial and Special Education, 6(5), 25–31.

11.

Mathematics Today. (1985). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

12.

Montague

, & Bos

C. S.

(1986). The effects of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.

13.

Muth

K. D.

(1984). Solving arithmetic word problems: Role of reading and computational skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 205–210.

14.

Pedhazur

(1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

15.

Silbert

Carnine

, & Stein

(1981). Direct instruction mathematics. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

16.

Torgesen

, & Kail

(1980). Memory processes in exceptional children. In Keough

B. K.

(Ed.), Advances in Special Education, 1 (pp. 232–249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.