ArmstrongB.JohnsonD., & BalowB. (1981). Effects of cooperative vs. individualistic learning experiences on interpersonal attraction between learning-disabled and normal-progress elementary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 102–109.
2.
CosdenM.PearlR., & BryanT. (1985). The effects of cooperative and individual goal structures on learning disabled and nondisabled students. Exceptional Children, 52, 103–114.
3.
GlassG.McGawB., & SmithM. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
JohnsonD., & JohnsonR. (1982). The effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction on handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 257–268.
5.
JohnsonD., & JohnsonR. (1984). Building acceptance of differences between handicapped and nonhandicapped students: The effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 257–267.
6.
JohnsonD., & JohnsonR. (1985). Mainstreaming hearing-impaired students: The effects of effort in communicating on cooperation and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Psychology, 119, 31–44.
7.
JohnsonR.JohnsonD.DeWeertN.LyonsV., & ZaidmanB. (1983). Integrating severely adaptively handicapped seventh-grade students into constructive relationships with nonhandicapped peers in science class. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 611–618.
8.
JohnsonR.JohnsonD.ScottL., & RamolaeB. (1985). Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 207–220.
9.
MaddenN., & SlavinR. (1983). Effects of cooperative learning on the social acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students. Journal of Special Education, 17, 171–182.
10.
SharanS. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241–271.
11.
SlavinR. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
12.
SlavinR. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–11.
13.
SlavinR. (1987). Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet. Elementary School Journal, 88, 29–37.
SlavinR.LeaveyM., & MaddenN. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84, 409–422.
16.
SlavinR.MaddenN., & LeaveyM. (1984a). Effects of cooperative learning and individualized instruction on mainstreamed students. Exceptional Children, 50, 434–443.
17.
SlavinR.MaddenN., & LeaveyM. (1984b). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813–819.
18.
SlavinR.StevensR., & MaddenN. (1988). Accommodating student diversity in reading and writing instruction: A cooperative learning approach. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 60–66.
19.
SmithK.JohnsonD., & JohnsonR. (1982). Effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction on the achievement of handicapped, regular, and gifted students. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 277–283.
20.
StevensR.MaddenN.SlavinR., & FarnishA. (1987). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433–454.
21.
Tateyama-SniezekK. (1990). Cooperative learning: Does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps?Exceptional Children, 56, 426–437.
22.
WebbN. (1985). Student interactions and learning in small groups: A research summary. In SlavinR.SharanS.KaganS.Hertz-LazarowitzR.WebbC., & SchmuckR. (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.