A proliferation of definitions of writing make competing claims about the objective nature and social value of writing. This article identifies three approaches to progress that characterize educational research: literal, interpretive, and evaluative. How writing researchers have implicitly subscribed to one of these approaches is considered, as well as the scientific and social implications as they relate to the writing of exceptional children. The article concludes by arguing the need for a dialectic among educators and writing researchers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleM. (1982). Education and power. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1976). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
CalkinsL. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
CrossD. R., & ParisS. G. (1987). Assessment of reading comprehension: Matching test purposes and test properties. Educational Psychologist, 22, 313–332.
5.
FishS. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (SmithA. M. S., Trans.). New York: Random House.
7.
FrederiksenN. (1981). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist, 39, 193–202.
8.
GirouxH. A. (1987). Critical literacy and student experience: Donald Graves' approach to literacy. Language Arts, 64, 175–181.
9.
GlassG. V. (1987). What works: Politics and research. Education Researcher, 16, 5–10.
10.
GravesD. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11.
HayesJ. R., & FlowerL. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. In MosenthalP.TamorL., & WalmsleyS. (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 206–220). New York: Longman.
12.
HempelC. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Hillocks (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
14.
JencksC. (1972). Inequality. New York: Basic Books.
15.
KamilM. L.LangerJ. A., & ShanahanT. (1985). Understanding reading and writing research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
16.
McCutchenD. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 431–444.
17.
McCutcheonG. (1981). On the interpretation of classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 10, 5–10.
18.
MervisC. B. (1980). Category structure and the development of categorization. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C., & BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 279–301). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 4–11.
20.
MosenthalP. B. (1983). On defining writing and classroom writing competence: A paradigmatic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 53, 217–252.
21.
MosenthalP. B. (1985). Defining progress in educational research. Educational Researcher, 14, 3–9.
22.
MosenthalP. B.Davidson-MosenthalR. L., & ColellaA. K. (1987). Two determinants of teachers' holistic scoring: Prior knowledge and ideology type. Elementary School Journal, 88, 39–49.
23.
PopkewitzT. S. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual. New York: Falmer Press.
24.
ResnickD. P., & ResnickL. B. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 370–385.
25.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (1986). Research on written composition. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
26.
ShapiroM. J. (1981). Language and political understanding: The politics of discursive practices. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
SpringJ. H. (1975). A primer of libertarian education. New York: Free Life Editions.
28.
WalmsleyS. A. (1983). Writing disability. In MosenthalP.TamorL., & WalmsleyS. A. (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 267–286). New York: Longman.
29.
WhiteE. M. (1986). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
30.
WittgensteinL. (1959). Philosophical investigations (AnscombeG. E. M., Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
