Direct instruction has come to have many different meanings, all of which are associated with some form of structured teaching. In this article, Direct Instruction refers primarily to the work done by Engelmann and his colleagues. Further, this article focuses on curriculum analysis, an aspect of Direct Instruction that is frequently neglected or obscured by an emphasis in the literature on classroom management and teacher performance. We discuss explicit strategies as they are used to teach higher cognitive skills, the importance of teacher training to an appropriate use of Direct Instruction curricula, and the supporting empirical research—from the mildly to the severely handicapped—for this highly successful approach to instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmbrusterB. (1985). Content area textbooks: A research perspective. In OsbornJ.WilsonP. T., & AndersonR. C. (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
2.
BeckerW. C. (1977). Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged: What we have learned from field research. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 518–543.
3.
BeckerW. C.EngelmannS.CarnineD. W., & RhineR. (1981). The Direct Instruction Model. In RhineR. (Ed.), Encouraging change in America's schools: A decade of experimentation. New York: Academic Press.
4.
BourbeauP. (1984). An experimental analysis of the generalization of banking skills from the classroom to trained and untrained bank settings in the community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
5.
BrophyJ., & GoodT. (1984). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
6.
CampbellD. T., & ErlebacherA. (1970). How regression artifacts in quasi-experimental evaluations in compensatory education tend to underestimate effects. In HellmuthJ. (Ed.), Disadvantaged child: Compensatory education: A national debate (Vol. 3). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
7.
CarnineD. W. (1980). Two letter discrimination sequences: High-confusion alternatives first versus low-confusion alternatives first. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(1), 41–47.
8.
CarnineD. W.KameenuiE. J., & MaggsA. (1982). Components of analytic assistance: Statement saying, concept training, and strategy training. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 374–377.
9.
CarnineD. W.KameenuiE. J., & WoolfsonN. (1982). Training of textual dimensions related to text-based inferences. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(3), 335–340.
10.
CarnineD., & KinderD. (1985). Teaching low performing students to apply generative and schema strategies to narrative and expository material. Remedial and Special Education, 6(1), 20–30.
11.
DarchC.CarnineD., & GerstenR. (1984). Explicit strategy instruction in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 77(6), 350–359.
12.
DurrW. K.LePereJ. M.BeanR. M.GlaserN. A., & EvanhardtK. S. (1983). Beacon teacher's guide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
EngelmannS., & CarnineD. W. (1982). Theory of instruction. New York: Irvington.
14.
EnglertC. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38–47.
15.
FabreT. (1983). The application of direct instruction in special education—An annotated bibliography. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, Eugene.
16.
FieldingG.KameenuiE., & GerstenR. (1983). A comparison of inquiry and direct instruction approaches toward teaching legal concepts and applications to secondary students. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 287–293.
17.
GerstenR. (1985). Direct instruction with special education students: A review of evaluation research. Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 41–50.
18.
GerstenR.BeckerW. C.HeiryT. J., & WhiteW.A.T. (1984). Entry IQ and yearly academic growth of children in Direct Instruction programs: A longitudinal study of low SES children. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 6(2), 109–121.
19.
GerstenR.CarnineD., & KeatingT. (1984, April). The lasting impact of the Direct Instruction Follow Through Program: Preliminary findings of a longitudinal study of 1500 students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
20.
GerstenR.CarnineD.ZorefL., & CroninD. (in press). A multi-faceted study of change in seven inner city schools. Elementary School Journal.
21.
GerstenR.CarnineD., & WilliamsP. (1982). Measuring implementation of a structured educational model in an urban school district: An observational approach. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(1), 67–79.
22.
GerstenR.GreenW., & DavisG. (1985, April). The realities of instructional leadership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
23.
GerstenR., & GuskeyT. (1985, April). Transforming teacher reluctance into teacher commitment. Paper presented at annual conference of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24.
GerstenR., & MaggsA. (1982). Teaching the general case to moderately retarded children: Evaluation of a five-year project. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 329–343.
25.
HallahanD. P.HallR. J.IanaS. O.KneedlerR. D.LloydJ. W.LoperA. B., & ReeveR. E. (1983). Summary of research findings at the University of Virginia Learning Disabilities Research Institute. Exceptional Educational Quarterly, 4(1), 95–114.
26.
HornerR. H.JonesD., & WilliamsJ. A. (1985). Teaching generalized street crossing to individuals with moderate and severe mental retardation. Journal of Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10(2), 71–78.
27.
HornerR. H., & McDonaldR. S. (1982). A comparison of single instance and general case instruction in teaching a generalized vocational skill. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 7–20.
28.
HouseE.GlassG.McLeanL., & WalkerD. (1978). No simple answer: Critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48(2), 128–160.
29.
LeinhardtG.ZigmondN., & CooleyW. W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–61.
30.
SteinL'E. C., & GoldmanJ. (1980). Beginning reading instruction for children with minimal brain dysfunction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 219–222.
31.
LloydJ.CullinanD.HeinsE., & EpsteinM. (1980). Direct instruction: Effects on oral and written language comprehension. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 3, 70–76.
32.
McDonnellJ.HornerR. H., & WilliamsJ. A. (1984). A comparison of three strategies for teaching generalized grocery purchasing to high school students with severe handicaps. Journal of Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9(2), 123–133.
33.
MaggsA., & MorathP. (1976). The effects of direct verbal instruction on intellectual development of institutionalized moderately retarded children: A two-year study. Journal of Special Education, 10, 357–364.
34.
MeyerL. A. (1984). Long-term academic effects of the Direct Instruction Project Follow Through. Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 380–394.
35.
MuirR. (1980). A teacher implements instructional changes using the BTES framework. In DenhamC. & LeibermanA. (Eds.), Time to learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
36.
OsbornJ. (1985). Workbooks. Counting, matching, and judging. In OsbornJ.WilsonP. T., & AndersonR. C. (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
37.
PatchingW.KameenuiE.CarnineD.GerstenR., & ColvinG. (1983). Direct Instruction in critical reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 406–418.
38.
ReithH. J., & FrickT. (1982). An analysis of academic learning time of mildly handicapped students in special education service delivery systems. Initial report on classroom process variables.Bloomington: Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped, Indiana University.
39.
RoehlerL., & DuffyG. G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In DuffyG.RoehlerL., & MasonJ. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions. New York: Longman.
40.
RosenshineB. (1976). Classroom instruction. In GageN. L. (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods: The seventy-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
RosenshineB., & StevensR. (1984). Classroom instruction in reading. In PearsonD. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Longman.
42.
RossD., & CarnineD. W. (1982). Analytic assistance: Effects of example selection, subjects' age, and syntactic complexity. Journal of Educational Research, 75(5), 294–298.
43.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D.AlleyG. R., & WarnerM. M. (1983). Toward the development of an intervention model for learning disabled adolescents: The University of Kansas Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4(1), 45–74.
44.
SingerH., & DonlanD. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166–168.
45.
SpragueJ. R., & HornerR. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance, and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 273–278.
46.
StebbinsL.St. PierreR. G.ProperE. C.AndersonR. B., & CervaT. R. (1977). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model (Vols. IV A-D). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, 1977.
47.
TallmadgeG. K. (1977). JDRP Ideabook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48.
WoodwardJ. (1985). Teaching with computer simulations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
