ArterJ. A., & JenkinsJ. R. (1979). Differential diagnoses-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.
2.
BattistaJ. R. (1982). The holistic paradigm and general system theory. In GrayW.FidlerJ., & BattistaJ. (Eds.), General systems theory and the psychological sciences (Vol. 1). Seaside: CA: Intersystems Publications.
3.
BernsteinR. J. (1983). Beyond objectivity and relativity, science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
von BertalanffyL. (1967). Robots, men and minds. New York: George Braziller.
5.
von BertalanffyL. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.
6.
BiklenD. (1985). Achieving the complete school, strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
7.
BohmD. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Portledge and Kegan.
8.
CapraF. (1975). The Tao of physics. Boulder CO: Shambhala.
9.
FryeN. (1981). Where metaphors and equations meet: A convergence of the arts and sciences. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21(7), 64.
10.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences.New York: Basic Books.
11.
GergenK., & GergenM. (1982). Explaining human conduct: Form and function. In SecordP. (Ed.), Explaining human behavior. Consciousness, human action, and social structure.Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
12.
GoodladJ. I. (1979). An ecological version of accountability. Theory Into Practice, 18, 308–314.
13.
HasselbriisP. (1982). I.E.P.‘s and a whole language model of language arts. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 1(4), 17–21.
14.
HeshusiusL. (1982). At the heart of the advocacy dilemma: A mechanistic world view. Exceptional Children, 49, 6–13.
15.
HeshusiusL. (1984). Why would they and I want to do it? A phenomenological-theoretical view of special education. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 7, 363–368.
16.
KavaleK. A., & FornessS. R. (1985). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox?Remedial and Special Education, 6(4), 12–23.
17.
KerchnerL. B., & KistingerB. J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
18.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LeighJ. E. (1980). Whole language approaches: Premises and possiblities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 62–69.
20.
LeShanL., & MargenauH. (1982). Einstein's space and van Gogh's sky. Physical reality and beyond.New York: Macmillan.
21.
McNuttG. (1984). A holistic approach to language arts instruction in the resource room. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 315–320.
22.
MorganG. (1983). Beyond method. Strategies for social research.Beverly Hills: Sage.
23.
NealC. (1984). The holistic teacher. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 309–314.
24.
PiagetJ. (1974). Development and learning. In MurrayFrank B. (Ed.). Critical features of Piaget's theory of the development of thought. New York: MSS. Information Corporation.
25.
PolkinghorneD. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Systems of inquiry.Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
PoplinM. (1984a). Summary rationalizations, apologies and farewell: What we don't know about the learning disabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 130–135.
27.
PoplinM. (1984b). Toward an holistic view of persons with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 290–294.
28.
PrigogineI., & StengersI. (1984). Order out of chaos. Man's new dialogue with nature.New York: Bantam Books.
29.
RandallF. (1984). Why scholars become storytellers. The New York Times Book Review, pp. 1, 31.
30.
ReidD. K., & HreskoW. P. (1981). A cognitive approach to learning disabilities. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
31.
RhodesL. K., & Dudley-MarlingC. C. (in press). Teaching reading and writing to learning disabled and remedial learners: A holistic perspective. Portsmith, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
32.
RhodesL. K., & ShannonJ. L. (1982). Psycholinguistic principles in operation in a primary learning disabilities classroom. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 1(4), 1–10.
33.
RortyR. (1982). Method, social science and social hope. In RortyR. (Ed.), Consequences of pragmatism (pp. 191–229). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
ScullyM. G. (1980). Social scientists, unable to explain some issues, turning to humanists. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20(5), pp. 1, 4.
35.
YsseldykeJ. E., & AlgozzineB. (1982). Critical issues in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB., & EppsS. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practice in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.
37.
YsseldykeJ. E., & SalviaJ. (1974). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: Two models. Exceptional Children, 41, 181–186.
38.
WheelerJ. A. (1977). Genesis and observership. In BattsR. E. & HintikkaJ. (Eds.), Foundational problems in the special sciences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Comp.