This article reviews primary research studies investigating the efficacy of early intervention with handicapped preschoolers. Meta-analysis techniques were employed to integrate statistically the findings from 74 studies. Findings indicate that: (a) early intervention with handicapped populations produces a positive sizeable effect size; (b) longer, more intense programs are associated with efficacy; and (c) little support was found for commonly held beliefs about early intervention, such as the importance of age at start and the degree of parental involvement. Implications for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarlbergC. G.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR.MaruyamaG.KavaleK.KulikC-L. C.KulikJ. A.LysakowskiR. S.PflaumS. W., & WalbergH. J. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: A reply to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 13(8), 16–23.
2.
CastoG., & WhiteK. R. (1985). The efficacy of early intervention programs with environmentally at-risk infants. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 17(1), 37–50.
3.
CastoG.WhiteK., & TaylorC. (1983). Final report 1982–83 work scope. Logan, UT: Early Intervention Research Institute, Utah State University.
4.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Educational Research Service (1980, December). Class-size research: A critique of recent meta-analysis. Kappan, 239–241.
6.
EysenckJ. J. (1983). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.
7.
FerryP. C. (1981). On growing new neurons: Are early intervention programs effective?Pediatrics, 67(1), 38–41.
8.
GalloP. S. (1978). Meta-analysis—a mixed metaphor. American Psychologist, 33, 515–517.
9.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
10.
GlassG. V. (1978a). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
11.
GlassG. V. (1978b). Reply to Mansfield and Bussey. Educational Researcher, 7, 3.
12.
GlassG. V.McGawB., & SmithM. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
13.
GlassG. V.SmithM. L., & MillerT. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
GottfriedN. W. (1973). Effects of early intervention programs. In MillerK. S. & OregorR. M. (Eds.), Comparative studies of blacks and whites in the U.S.New York: Seminar Press.
15.
HorstD. P.TallmadgeG. K., & WoodC. T. (1975). A practical guide to measuring project impact on student achievement (No. 1, Stock No. 017-080-01460-2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
JacksonG. B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50(3), 438–460.
17.
KavaleK. (1980). Meta-analysis of experiments on the treatment of hyperactivity in children. Riverside, CA: University of California-Riverside.
18.
KavaleK. (1982). The efficacy of stimulant drug treatment for hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(5), 280–289.
19.
McGawB., & GlassG. V. (1980). Choice of the metric for effect size in meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 325–337.
20.
MansfieldR. S., & BusseyT. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of research: A rejoinder to Glass. Educational Researcher, 6, 3.
21.
ShaverJ. P. (1979). The usefulness of educational research in curricular/instructional decision-making in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 7(3), 21–46.
22.
SimpsonS. N. (1979). Comment on “meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement.”London, England: Institute of Education.
23.
SlavinR. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: How has it been used?Educational Researcher, 13(8), 6–15.
24.
TallmadgeG. K. (1977). Ideabook: The Joint Dissemination Review Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
25.
WhiteK.BushD., & CastoG. (in press). Let the past be prologue: Learning from previous reviews of early intervention efficacy research. Journal of Special Education.
26.
WhiteK. R., & CastoG. (1984). An integrative review of early intervention efficacy studies with at risk children: Implications for the handicapped. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 177–201.
27.
WhiteK. R., & MyetteB. (1982, March). Drug treatment of hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
