Innovative and effective assessment and intervention materials for language disorders are acutely needed in special education and bilingual education. This paper describes how microcomputer courseware can be developed to provide interactive receptive language testing and training materials for the bilingual, language-handicapped child. A description of a prototype program which has been used to both test and train language impaired children is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BloomL.Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1970.
2.
CarrowM.The development of auditory comprehension of language structure in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1968, 33(2), 99–111.
3.
CourtrightJ., & CourtrightI.Imitative modeling as a theoretical base for instructing language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19(4), 655–663.
4.
CourtrightJ., & CourtrightI.Imitative modeling as a language intervention strategy: The effects of two mediating variables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1979, 22(2), 389–402.
5.
CumminsJ.Cognitive factors associated with the attainment of intermediate levels of bilingual skills. The Modern Language Journal, 1977, 61(1–2), 3–12.
6.
EiseleJ.Classroom use of microcomputers. Educational Technology, 1979, 19(10), 13–15.
7.
FishmanJ.Bilingual education and the future of language teaching and language learning in the United States. In CordascoF. (Ed.), Bilingual schooling in the United States: A source book for educational personnel. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
8.
FoxB.A study comparing live and computer administered receptive syntax items testing the prepositions in, on and under. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Vermont, 1980.
9.
GoetzL.SchulerA., & SailorW.Teaching functional speech to the severely handicapped: Current issues. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1979, 9(4), 325–343.
10.
HarrisM., & HassemerW.Some factors affecting the complexity of children's sentences: The effects of modeling age, sex and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 13(3), 447–155.
11.
LeeL.A screening test for syntax development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1970, 35(2), 103–112.
12.
LennebergE.Understanding language without ability to speak: A case report. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65(6), 419–425.
13.
MenyukP.The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971.
14.
RuderK.HermannK., & SchiefelbuschR.The effect of verbal imitation and comprehension training on verbal production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1977, 6(1), 59–72.
15.
ShipleyE.SmithC., & GleitmanL.A study in the acquisition of language: Free responses to commands. Language, 1969, 45(2), 322–342.
16.
SouvineyR.There's a microcomputer in your future. Teacher, 1980, 97(5), 53–61.
17.
WatsonP.The utilization of the computer with the hearing impaired and the handicapped. American Annals of the Deaf, 1969, 124(5), 670–680.
WilsonM.Syntax remediation: A generative grammar approach to language development. Cambridge MA: Educators Publishing Service, 1977.
21.
WilsonM.Prescriptive analysis of language disorders—Receptive syntax assessment. Cambridge MA: Educators Publishing Service, in press.
22.
WilsonM., & FoxB.Computer approaches to language diagnosis and treatment in communication disorders. Region Ten Convention of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Hartford CT, 1980.
23.
WinitzH., & ReedsJ.Comprehension and problem solving as strategies for language training. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
24.
ZimmermanB., & PikeE.Effects of modeling and reinforcement on the acquisition and generalization of question-asking behavior. Child Development, 1972, 43(3), 892–907.
25.
ZimmermanB., & RosenthalT.Observational learning of rule-governed behavior by children. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81(1), 29–42.