AbesonA.Movement and momentum: Government and the education of handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 1972, 39, 63–66.
2.
AbesonA.BolickN., & HassJ.A primer on due process: Education decisions for handicapped children. Reston VA: The Council For Exceptional Children, 1975.
3.
BolickN. (Ed.). Digest of state and federal laws: Education of handicapped children (3rd ed.). Reston VA: The Council For Exceptional Children, 1974.
4.
Brown v. Board of Education. 1954, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98L.Ed.873.
5.
Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education. State plan amendment for fiscal year 1975 under part B, Education of the Handicapped Act, as amended by Section 614 of P. L. 93–380: Basic content areas required by the act and suggested guidelines and principles for inclusion under each area. Washington DC: Author, 1974 (draft).
6.
Children's Defense Fund.Children out of school in America. Cambridge MA: Author, 1974.
7.
DimondP.The constitutional right to education: The quiet revolution. The Hastings Law Journal, 1973, 24, 1087–1127.
8.
Diana v. State Board of Education. Civil Action No. C-70 37 R.F.P. (N.D. Cal., Jan. 7, 1970 and June 18, 1973).
9.
DunnL. M.Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 1968, 35, 5–22.
10.
Larry P. v. Riles, Civil Action No. 6-71-2270 343F. Supp. 1036 (N.D. Cal., 1972).
11.
Lori Case v. State of California, Civil No. 13127, Court of Appeals, Fourth Dist. Calif., filed Dec. 14, 1973.
12.
MercerJ.The ecology of mental retardation. In The proceedings of the first annual spring conference on the institute for the study of mental retardation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1970.
13.
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C., 1972).
14.
National Advisory Committee on the Education of the Handicapped.The unfinished revolution: Education of the handicapped. Washington DC: GPO, 1976.
15.
National Education Association.Schools must face serious problems posed by integrating handicapped, NEA president says. (NEA Press Release). Washington DC: Author, October 10, 1975.
16.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972, Order, Injunction and Consent Agreement).
17.
Public Law 93–112, Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, July 26, 1973.
18.
Public Law 93–380, Education Amendments of 1974, August 21, 1974.
19.
Public Law 94–142, Education for All Handicapped Children Act, November 29, 1975.
20.
ReynoldsM. C.A framework for considering some issues in special education. Exceptional Children, 1962, 28, 367–370.
21.
RossS. L.DeYoungH. G.Jr., and CohenJ. S.Confrontation: Special education placement and the law. Exceptional Children, 1971, 38, 5–12.
22.
State of Illinois.Rules and regulations to govern the administration and operation of special education, Article X, 1974.
23.
Tennessee Code Annotated, Sec. 1, 8A, 23, Chap. 839, 1972.
24.
TrudeauE., & NyeR.The provision of special educational services in nonpublic facilities. Arlington VA: The Council For Exceptional Children, 1973.
25.
US Congress, Senate, Education for All Handicapped Children Act, S.6., 94th Congress, 1st Session, June 2, 1975, Report No. 94–168.
26.
WeintraubF.Recent influences of the law regarding the identification and educational placement of children. Focus on Exceptional Children1972, 4, 1–10.
27.
WeintraubF.Understanding the individualized education program (IEP). Amicus, March 1977, 23–27.
28.
WeintraubF., & AbesonA., New educational policies for the handicapped: The quiet revolution. Phi Delta Kappan, 1974, 55, 528.