BlattB.Introduction to symposium: The legal rights of the mentally retarded. Syracuse Law Review, 1972, 23, 991–993.
2.
Diana v. State Board of Education, No. C-70-37 (N.D. Cal.), 1970.
3.
GilhoolT. K.The uses of litigation: The right of retarded children to a free public education. Peabody Journal of Education, 1973, 50, 120–217.
4.
GoldsteinH., Master, Interview in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 11, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
5.
HaggertyD., Master, Interview in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 8, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
6.
HaggertyD., & GoldsteinH.First and interim report of the Masters. 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972), filed August 2, 1972. (a).
7.
HaggertyD., & GoldsteinH.Second and interim report of the Masters. 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972), filed November 10, 1972. (b).
8.
HaggertyD., & GoldsteinH.Third and interim report of the Masters. 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972), filed March 9, 1972. (c).
9.
HegeleJ.Esq., Interview in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 10, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
10.
Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C. 1967).
11.
In re: Educational assignment for John Doe, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children.No. 1. In the Office of John Pittenger, Secretary of Education, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, August 22, 1973.
12.
KirpD.BussW., & KuriloffP. J.Legal reform of special education: Empirical studies and procedural proposals. California Law Review, in press.
13.
LantzerJ., Director, Right to Education Office, Interview in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, March 27, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania. (a).
14.
LantzerJ., Director, Right to Education Office, Interview in Erie, Pennsylvania, July 10, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania. (b).
15.
LippmanL., & GoldbergI.Right to Education: Anatomy of the Pennsylvania case and its implications for exceptional children.New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1973.
16.
MatzaD.Delinquency and drift.New York: Wiley Press, 1964.
17.
MetalonisP.BarallM.BeutlerL. C.LintE. G.MerlinS. B., & StevensB.Final report on COMPET by the Masters Evaluation and Review Committee, July 12, 1973.
18.
MeteL., Right to Education Office, Interview in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, February 7, 1974, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
19.
Mills v. Board of Education, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).
20.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972).
21.
Pennsylvania State Departments of Education and Public Welfare.COMPILE: Commonwealth plan for identification, location, and evaluation of mentally retarded children.Philadelphia: State Departments of Education and Public Welfare, 1972. (a).
22.
Pennsylvania State Departments of Education and Public Welfare.COMPET: Commonwealth plan to educate and train mentally retarded children.Philadelphia: State Departments of Education and Public Welfare, 1972. (b).
23.
Philadelphia Association for Retarded Children.The SPARC (Special Childhood Issue), 1972.
24.
PolloniP., Executive Director, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children, Interview in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, January 15, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
25.
Public School Code of 1949, 24 Purd. Stat. Sec. 1330(2).
26.
RossS. L.DeYoungH. G., & CohenJ. S.Confrontation: Special Education placement and the law. Exceptional Children, 1971, 38, 5–12.
27.
SmokerM., Assistant Director for Administrative and Governmental Affairs, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children, Interview in Scranton, Pennsylvania, June 12, 1973, on file with the Project on Student Classification and the Law, University of Pennsylvania.
28.
Stipulation of Facts Concerning Compliance by Co-defendant School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (filed August 1, 1972).