This article offers a definition of the term culturally different gifted child. It reexamines the identification procedure and calls for more research with an emphasis on environmental and sociological variables. The need for qualitatively differentiated program provisions is discussed. The article also points out what is being done to fulfill the special and different needs of the culturally different gifted child and offers information on the educational programs being instituted throughout the US. Some available resources which have generated new materials are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernalE. M.Jr.Assessing assessment instruments: A Chicano perspective. Paper presented at the Regional Training Program to Serve the Bilingual/Bicultural Exceptional Child, Montal Educational Associates, Sacramento, California, 1972.
2.
BloomB. S.Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley, 1964.
3.
BruchC. B.The ABDA: Making the Stanford-Binet culturally biased for disadvantaged Black children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens, 1972.
4.
FitzgeraldE. (Ed.) Presentations at the National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted. Ventura, Cal.: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools, 1974, in press.
5.
FriersonE.Upper and lower status children: A study of differences. Exceptional Children, 1965, 32, 83–90.
6.
GallagherJ. J.Teaching the gifted child. (Revised ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1974, in press.
7.
GuilfordJ. P.Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. Great Britain: Robert R. Knapp, 1968.
8.
GuilfordJ. P.The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
9.
KaplanS.Providing programs for the gifted and talented: A handbook. Ventura, Cal.: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools, 1973. (Working draft)
10.
JenkinsM. D.The upper limit of ability among American Negroes. Scientific Monthly, 1948, 66, 339–401.
11.
MartinsonR.The identification of the gifted and talented. Ventura, Cal.: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools, 1973. (Working draft)
12.
McClellandD.C. (Ed.) Talent and society. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold Books, 1958.
13.
MeekerM.The structure of intellect: Its use and interpretation. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1969.
14.
NilesC. C.Gifted children. In CarmichaelL. (Ed.), Manual of child psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1954.
15.
PassowH. A.The gifted and the disadvantaged. The National Elementary Principal, 1972, 51, 22–31.
16.
ReissmanF.The culturally deprived gifted. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
17.
RenzulliJ. S.Talent potential in minority group students. Exceptional Children, 1971, 39, 437–444.
18.
RenzulliJ. S., & HartmanR. K.Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 1971, 38, 243–248.
19.
SatoI.Group summary for work conference on the culturally different gifted child. Unpublished manuscript, National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented, Los Angeles, 1973.
20.
StallingsC.Gifted disadvantaged children. Unpublished technical paper, The University of Connecticut, 1972.
21.
TorranceE. P.Are the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking biased against or in favor of ‘disadvantaged groups’?Gifted Child Quarterly, 1971, 15, 75–80.
22.
WittyP., & JenkinsM. D.The educational achievement of a group of gifted Negro children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934, 45, 585–597.
23.
US Commissioner of Education. Education of the Gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States. Washington, D.C.: US Office of Education, 1972.
