A brief review is presented of the current heavy emphasis on the management of consequent events (i.e., those occurring after behavior), as opposed to the relative disinterest in antecedent events (i.e., those occurring prior to behavior). A basic taxonomy of instructions which discusses the characteristics of instructions, instructors, and instructees, and factors related to the effects of instructions on instructees is proposed. It is suggested that a field should be developed which is devoted to the investigation of antecedent events and which would be as precise and thorough as research focused on consequent events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyllonT., & AzrinN.Reinforcement and instructions with mental patients. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964, 7, 327–331.
2.
BanduraA.Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
3.
BijouS., & BaerD.Child development: Readings in experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
4.
HallR. V., CristlerC., CranstonS. S., & TuckerB.Teachers and parents as researchers using multiple baseline techniques. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 247–255.
5.
HonigW. K.Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
6.
HopkinsB. L.Effects of candy and social reinforcement, instructions, and reinforcement schedule learning on the modification and maintenance of smiling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 121–129.
7.
KirbyF., & TollerH.Modification of preschool isolate behavior: A case study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 309–314.
8.
LovittT., & SmithJ. O.Effects of variations of instruction on an individual's verbal behavior. Exceptional Children, 1972, 38, 685–693.
9.
MadsenC., BeckerW., & ThomasD.Rules, praise and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 139–150.
10.
MowrerD.The management of consequent events in speech therapy. In BermanM.L. (Ed.), Motivation and learning: Applying contingency management techniques. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1971.
11.
PackardR.The control of “classroom attention”: A group contingency for complex behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 13–28.
12.
SchutteR. D., & HopkinsB. L.The effects of teacher attention following instructions in a kindergarten class. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 117–122.
13.
SkinnerB. F.Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
14.
UlrichR., StachnikT., & MabryJ. (Eds.) Control of human behavior. Vol. 1. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1966.
15.
UlrichR., StachnikT., & MabryJ. (Eds.) Control of human behavior. Vol. 2. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1970.
16.
WaltersR., & RayE.Anxiety, social isolation, and reinforcer effectiveness. Journal of Personality, 1960, 28, 358–367.
