The literature on accountability is reviewed and suggestions are offered for the application of accountability and performance contracting in special education. Personal accountability for teachers and administrators is suggested. Legal action may be one form of accountability for special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruininksR. H., & RyndersJ. E.Alternatives to special class placement for educable mentally retarded children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1971, 3 (4).
2.
CookJ., & BlessingK. R.Class size and teacher aides as factors in the achievement of the educable mentally retarded. Final report. (OEG 3–6–062620–19) Madison: Wisconsin State Department of Education, 1970.
3.
EstesN.Proceedings of the Conference on Educational Accountability. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1971.
4.
FriedersB.Motivation and performance contracting. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1971, 5, 49–61.
5.
GallupG.The second annual survey of the public's attitudes toward the public school. Phi Delta Kappan, 1970, 52, 33–46.
6.
GlavinJ. P., QuayH. C., AnnesleyF. R., & WerryJ. S.An experimental resource room for behavior problem children. Exceptional Children, 1971, 38, 131–137.
7.
LessingerL.Every child a winner. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1970.
8.
LessingerL.Accountability: Its implications for the teacher. In AllenD.W. (Ed.), 77;e teachers' handbook. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1971. Pp. 72–82.
9.
MartinE.New public priority: Education of the handicapped. In Compact. Denver, Col.: Education Commission of the States, 1971. Pp. 4–8.
