Descriptions of the mentally retarded and educational recommendations based on learning deficiency concepts are criticized, and an alternative developmental view of mental retardation is proposed. The educational consequences of learning deficiency and developmental views of mental retardation are contrasted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumeisterA. A.Learning abilities of the mentally retarded. In BaumeisterA. A. (Ed.), Mental retardation: Appraisal, education, and rehabilitation. Chicago: Aldine, 1967. Pp. 181–211.
2.
BaumeisterA. A., HawkinsW. F., & DavisP. A.Stimulus reponse durations in paired associates learning of normals and retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 7, 580–584.
3.
BlakeK. A., & WilliamsC. L.Induction and deduction and retarded, normal and superior subjects' concept attainment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 226–231.
4.
DennyM. R.Research in learning and performance. In StevensH. A. and HeberR. (Eds.), Mental retardation: A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964. Pp. 100–142.
5.
DollE. A.Adultation of the special child. Exceptional Children, 1963, 29, 275–280.
6.
FineM. J.Attitudes of regular and special class teachers toward the educable mentally retarded child. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 429–430.
GardnerW. I., & BrandlC.Reinforcement conditions and incidental learning in mentally retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1967, 72, 215–219.
9.
GerjuoyI. R., & SpitzH. H.Associative clustering in free recall: Intellectual and developmental variables. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 70, 918–927.
10.
HaywoodC. H., & HealL. W.Retention of learned visual association as a function of IQ and learning levels. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 72, 828–838.
11.
JohnsonG. O.Relationship of learning rate and developmental rate. Exceptional Children1959, 26, 68–69.
12.
JohnsonG. O.Special education for the mentally handicapped—A paradox. Exceptional Children, 1962, 29, 62–69.
13.
JohnsonG. O.Paradox in special education? A reply. Exceptional Children, 1964, 31, 68–70.
14.
JonesD., & BentonA. L.Reaction time and mental age in normal and retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 143–147.
15.
KermW. A.Negative transfer on sorting tasks MA, and IQ in normal and retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 196772, 416–421.
16.
LipmanR. S.Learning: Verbal, perceptual-motor and classical conditioning. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 391–423.
17.
McPhersonM. W.A survey of experimental studies of learning in individuals who achieve subnormal ratings on standardized psychometric measures. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1948, 52, 232–254.
18.
McPhersonM. W.Learning and mental deficiency. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1958, 62, 870–877.
19.
MeyenE. L., & HieronymusA. N.The age placement of academic skills in curriculum for the EMR. Exceptional Children, 1970, 36, 333–339.
20.
MilgramN. A.Verbalization and conceptual control classification in trainable mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 70, 763–765.
21.
MillerL. K., HaleG. A., & StevensonH. W.Learning and problem solving by retarded and normal subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 72, 681–690.
22.
MordockJ. B.Maze learning: The effects of variations in practice conditions, age, and intelligence. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 113–117.
23.
PiagetJ.Development and learning. In RippleR. E. and RockastleV. N. (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered. Conference on cognitive studies and curriculum development. New York: Cornell University Press, 1964. Pp. 7–20.
24.
PiagetJ. Foreword. In AlmyM., ChittendenE., and MillerP., Young children's thinking: Studies in some aspects of Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press, 1966. Pp. III–VII.
25.
PopeL., & AbrahamH.Reading disability. In WortisJ.(Ed.), Mental retardation: An annual review II. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1970. Pp. 133–135.
26.
PrehmH. J.Associative learning in retarded and normal children as a function of task difficulty and meaningfulness. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 70, 860–865.
27.
RohwerW. D.Jr., & LynchS.Retardation, school strata, and learning proficiency. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 91–96.
28.
SpitzH. H., HoatsD. L., & HoldenE. A.Numerosity discrimination of tachistoscopically presented dots by mental retardates and normals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 127–138.
29.
SteigmanM. J.Motivational level, task complexity, and learning in the mentally retarded: An hypothesis. Exceptional Children, 1962, 29, 70–72.
30.
SteigmanM. J.Paradox in special education? A critique of Johnson's paper. Exceptional Children, 1964, 31, 67–68.
31.
StephensW. E.Category usage of normal and subnormal children on three types of categories. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 71, 266–273.
32.
StevensonH. W.Discrimination learning. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 424–437.
33.
VergasonG. A.Retention in educable retarded subjects for two methods of instruction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1966, 70, 683–688.
34.
WoodrowH.The ability to learn. Psychological Review, 1946, 53, 147–158.
35.
ZiglerE.Familial mental retardation: A continuing dilemma. Science, 1967, 155, 292–298.
36.
ZiglerE.Developmental versus difference theories of mental retardation and the problem of motivation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1969, 73, 527–566.
