The Affective/Cognitive Attitude Dimension of Teachers of Educable Mentally Retarded Minors

Abstract

From one school district 40 men and 40 women teachers of educable mentally retarded students, grades 7 to 12, were randomly selected. Each teacher completed the Preferred Student Characteristic Scale which permitted the ascertainment of teacher attitude in terms of affective and cognitive goals. The purpose was to determine the effects of and interactions between teachers’ years of classroom experience, different secondary levels and experience with EMR's, and sex differences on cognitive/affective attitudes of teachers. Results were treated by analysis of variance. This study supports the view that special class teachers consider personal and social adjustment aspects of the educative process of major importance when compared to subject matter acquisition.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beamer

G. C.

, & Ledbetter

E. W.

The relation between teacher attitudes and the social science interest. Journal of Educational Research, 1957, 50, 655–666.

Brookover

W. B.

, & Gottlieb

A sociology of education. (2nd ed.) New York: American Book, 1964.

Cain

L. F.

The teacher and the handicapped child. Education, 1949, 69, 275–279.

Day

H. P.

Attitude changes of beginning teachers after initial teaching experience. The Journal of Teacher Education, 1959, 10, 326–328.

Evans

K. M.

The Minnesota teacher attitude inventory. Educational Research, 1966, 8, 134–141.

Fine

M. J.

Attitudes of regular and special class teachers toward the educable mentally retarded child. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 429–430.

Gage

N. L.

, Leonard

G. S.

, & Stone

G. C.

Teacher understanding of their pupils and pupil ratings of their teachers. Psychological Monographs, 1955, 69, No. 405.

Hutt

M. L.

, & Gibby

R. G.

The mentally retarded child. Development, education, and treatment. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1965.

Johnson

G. O.

Special education for the mentally retarded—a paradox. Exceptional Children, 1962, 29, 62–69.

10.

Krumboltz

J. D.

, & Farquhar

W. W.

The effect of three teaching methods on achievement and motivational outcomes on a new study course. Psychological Monographs, 1957, 71, No. 443.

11.

Lindgren

H. C.

, & Patton

G. M.

Attitudes of high school and other teachers toward children and current educational methodology. California Journal of Educational Research 1958, 9, 80–85.

12.

Nelson

C. C.

Affective and cognitive attitudes of junior high school teachers and pupils. The Journal of Educational Research, 1964, 58, 81–83.

13.

Noel

Effectiveness of an academically oriented teaching program with crippled children. Exceptional Children, 1966, 32, 325–327.

14.

Rabinowitz

, & Rosenbaum

Teaching experience and teachers’ attitudes. The Elementary School Journal, 1960, 60, 313–319.

15.

Robinson

H. B.

, & Robinson

N. M.

The mentally retarded child: A psychological approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

16.

Rosanthal

, & Jacobson

Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

17.

Sandgren

D. L.

, & Schmidt

L. G.

Does practice teaching change attitudes toward teaching?

Journal of Educational Research, 1956, 49, 673–680.

18.

Tenny

J. W.

Preparing teachers of mentally handicapped children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1954, 59, 566–572.

19.

Young

M. A.

Teaching children with special learning needs: A problem solving approach. New York: John Day, 1967.