Fifty middle class and 50 lower class Negro kindergarten boys were administered a battery of eight instruments designed to assess specific information processing abilities. An analysis of 19 variables produced five reasonably meaningful components, with a general language ability component the most significant. When class groups were compared, this component discriminated most significantly between the groups. Implications for educational definition, diagnosis, and program planning are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiAnne, and D'AngeloRita Y.A comparison of Negro and white preschool children in language development and Goodenough Draw-a-Man IQ.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1952, 81, 147–165.
2.
BeeryK.Geometric form reproduction.San Rafael, Calif.: Author, 1964.
3.
BeeryK.Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration.Chicago: Follett, 1967.
4.
BereiterC.The exceptional child. Unpublished paper, Institute for Research on Exceptional Children, University of Illinois, 1965.
5.
BereiterC., and EnglemannS.Preschool education for disadvantaged children.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
6.
BernsteinB.Language and social class.British Journal of Sociology, 1960, 11, 271–276.
7.
BernsteinB.Social Class and linguistic development: A theory of social learning. In HalseyA. H., FloudJ., and AndersonC. A. (Eds.), Education, economy, and society.New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1961. Pp. 288–314.
8.
BrodbeckA., and IrwinO.The speech behavior of infants without families.Child Development, 1946, 17, 145–156.
9.
DavisEdith A.The development of linguistic skill in twins, singletons with siblings, and only children from age five to ten years.Institute of Child Welfare Monograph, No. 14. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1937.
10.
DayElla J.The development of language in twins: I. A comparison of twins and single children.Child Development, 1933, 3, 179–199.
11.
DcutschM.The role of social class in language development and cognition.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1965. 35, 78–88.
12.
EellsK. W., DavisA., HavighurstR. J., HerrickV. E., and TaylorR. W.Intelligence and cultural differences: a study of cultural learning and problem-solving.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.
13.
EnglemannS.Cultural deprivation: Description and remedy. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Research on Exceptional Children, University of Illinois, 1964.
14.
FeldmanJ.Computer simulation of cognitive processes. In BorkoH. (Ed.), Computer applications in the behavioral sciences.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
15.
GehlbachSally J.A comparison of language skills of culturally disadvantaged and culturally privileged pre-kindergarten children. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Illinois, 1965.
16.
IrwinO. C.Infant speech: the effect of family occupational status and of age on sound frequency.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders.1948, 13, 224–226. (a)
17.
IrwinO. C.Infant speech: the effect of family occupational status and of age on sound types.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1948, 13, 320–322. (b)
18.
JohnVera P.The intellectual development of slum children: some preliminary findings.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1963, 33, 813–822.
19.
JonesH. E.Environmental influences on mental development. In CarmichaelL. (Ed.), Manual of child psychology.New York: John Wiley, 1946. Pp. 582–632.
20.
JonesH. E.The environment and mental development. In CarmichaelL. (Ed.), Manual of child development.New York: John Wiley, 1954. Pp. 631–696.
21.
KassCorrine E.Some psychological correlates of severe reading disability (dyslexia). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1962.
McCandlessB.Environment and intelligence.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1952, 56, 674–691.
24.
McCandlessB.Relation of environmental factors to intellectual functioning. In StevensH. A., and HeberR. (Eds.), Mental retardation: A review of research.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964. Pp. 175–213.
25.
McCarthyDorotheaLanguage development of the preschool child.Institute of Child Welfare Monograph, No. 4. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1930.
26.
McCarthyJ. J., and KirkS. A.Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities: experimental edition.Urbana, Ill.: Institute for Research on Exceptional Children, University of Illinois, 1961.
27.
McCarthyJeanne McRaePatterns of psycholinguistic development of Mongoloid and non-Mongoloid severely retarded children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1965.
28.
RyckmanD. B.Psychological processes of disadvantaged children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1966.
29.
SarasonS. B., and GladwinT.Psychological and cultural problems in mental subnormality: a review of research.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1958, 57.
30.
SillerJ.Socioeconomic status and conceptual thinking.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 365–371.
31.
SimmonsR. F.Syntax: toward computer synthesis of human language behavior. In BorkoH. (Ed.), Computer applications in the behavioral sciences.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962. Pp. 360–393.
32.
SmithMadorah E.A study of some factors influencing the development of the sentence in preschool children.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1935, 46, 182–212.
33.
TaylorD. W.Toward an information processing theory of motivation. In JonesM. R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation.Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press, 1960. Pp. 51–79.
34.
US Bureau of the Census.US census of population and housing: 1960. Census tracts: Chicago, Illinois.Final Report PHC(1)-26. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1962.
35.
WeinerP. S., WepmanJ. M., and MorencyAnne S.A test of visual discrimination.Elementary School Journal, 1965, 65, 330–337.
36.
WepmanJ. M.Auditory discrimination test: manual of directions.Chicago: Language Research Associates, 1958.
37.
YoungFlorence M.An analysis of certain variables in a developmental study of language.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1941, 23.
