BalinskyB.An analysis of the mental factors in various age groups from nine to sixty. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1941, 23, 191–234.
2.
CassellJ. T.Serial verbal learning and retroactive inhibition in aments. J. Clin. Psychol., 1957, 13, 369–372.
3.
CohenJ.The factorial structure of the WAIS between early adulthood and old age. J. consult. Psychol. 1957, 21, 283–290.
4.
CruickshankW. M. & BlakeK. A.A comparative study of the performance of mentally handicapped and intellectually normal boys on selected tasks involving learning and transfer. Syracuse Univer. Research Institute, Office of Research in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 1957.
5.
DavisP. C.A factor analysis of the Wechsler Bellevue Scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1956, 16, 127–146
6.
DelattreLois & ColeD.A comparison of the WISC and the W-B. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 228–230.
7.
GaultUna. Factorial patterns of Wechsler intelligence scales. Austr. J. Psychol., 1954, 6, 85–93.
8.
HammerA. G.A factorial analysis of the Bellevue tests. Austral. J. Psychol., 1950, 1, 108–114.
9.
JohnsonG. O.Comparative studies of some learning characteristics in mentally retarded and normal children of the same mental age. Syracuse Univ. Research Institute, Syracuse Univ. Press, 1958.
10.
KnopfI. J., MurfettBetty, & MilsteinV.Relationship between the W-B Form 1 and the WISC. J. din. Psychol., 1954, 10, 261–63.
11.
KolstoeO. P.A comparison of mental abilities of bright and dull children of comparable mental ages. J. educ. Psychol., 1954, 45, 161–168.
12.
LaycockS. R. & StanleyC.The comparative performance of a group of old-dull and young-bright children on some items of the Revised Stanford Binet Scale of Intelligence (L). J. educ. Psychol., 1942, 33, 1–12.
13.
LucitoL. & GallagherJ.Intellectual patterns of highly gifted children on the WISC. Peabody J. Educ., 1960, 38, 131–136.
14.
MageretAnn & ThompsonC. W.Differential test responses of normal superior and mentally deficient subjects. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1950, 45, 163–167.
15.
NormanR. D.Sex differences and other aspects of young superior adult performance on the W-B. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 411–418.
16.
StaceyC. L. & CarletonF. O.The relationship between Raven's colored progressive matrices and two tests of general intelligence. J. clin. Psychol., 1955, 11, 84–85.
17.
StaceyC. L. & GillMarie. The relationship between Raven's colored progressive matrices and two tests of general intelligence for 172 subnormal adult subjects. J. din. Psychol., 1955, 11, 86–87.
18.
ThompsonC. W. & MagaretAnn. Differential test responses of normals and mental defectives. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1947, 42, 285–293.
19.
UnsickerW. D.A psychological study of bright and dull children with comparable mental ages. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation). Univer. of Iowa, 1950.
20.
WallinJ. E. W.A statistical study of the individual tests in the Stanford Binet Scale Mental Measurement Monograph, 1929, 6, 1–58.
21.
WoodrowH.Practice and transference in normal and feebleminded children. J. educ. Psychol., 1917, 8, 85–96, 151–165.