Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Navigating School Choice at the Intersection of Disability,Race,and Class: Mothers of Students With Disabilities Accessing Information in Competitive Local Education Markets
In this study, we examine how mothers of students with disabilities (SWDs) from different racial and class backgrounds access information about schools in competitive local education markets (LEMs). We employ an intersectional approach to school choice that focuses on the labor of mothers and a qualitative design based on interviews and a focus group discussion to answer the following research questions: How do mothers of SWDs search for and find information about school options in LEMs? How and to what extent are their experiences searching for school information shaped by their intersecting social categories (e.g., race and class)? Mothers of SWDS participating in the study searched for information through three mediums: (a) searching at a distance for hard information (i.e., online search and calling schools), (b) campus visits during school open days, and (c) their social networks. Because schools respond to competitive pressures in ableist ways (i.e., offering either limited information relevant to parents of SWDs or information geared to dissuade them from enrolling), mothers relied heavily on information from their social networks, which created inequities in access to information according to parents’ intersecting social categories (i.e., disability, race, and class). The length of experience of mothers in the school district mediated these inequities. We conclude by noting the problematic implications of these findings and recommendations for policy and research.
AcevesT. C. (2014). Supporting Latino families in special education through community agency-school partnerships. Multicultural Education, 21(3–4), 45–50.
2.
AltenhofenS.BerendsM.WhiteT. G. (2016). School choice decision making among suburban, high-income parents. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415624098
3.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD. J.FerriB. A. (2013). Dis/Ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
4.
BaconJ. K. (2019). The impact of neoliberal school choice reforms on students with disabilities: Perspectives from New York city. Disability & Society, 34(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1509768
5.
BagleyC. A.WoodsP. A.WoodsG. (2001). Implementation of school choice policy: Interpretation and response by parents of students with special educational needs. British Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120048313
6.
Barnard-BrakL.SchmidtM.AlmekdashM. H. (2018). Enrollment of students with disabilities in charter schools: Contemporary national and state level findings. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(43). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3276
7.
BatzR.BlanchardS. B. (2025). When being an expert may not be enough: Understanding the experiences of special education professionals parenting children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 91(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029241298240
8.
ByrneA. (2013). What factors influence the decisions of parents of children with special educational needs when choosing a secondary educational provision for their child at change of phase from primary to secondary education? A review of the literature. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01211.x
9.
Center for Learner Equity [CLE]. (2022). A secondary analysis of the Civil Rights Data Collection to inform policy and practice. https://www.centerforlearnerequity.org/news/crdc17-18/.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2021). (M)othering labeled children: Bilingualism and disability in the lives of Latinx mothers. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800411296
13.
Cioè-PeñaM.MigliariniV.BenekeM. (2024). Discrit mothering: Interrogating consequential education for our children’s lives and humanity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(9), 2489–2492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2024.2388679
14.
CollinsP. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
15.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
16.
DiMartinoC.JessenS. B. (2018). Selling school: The marketing of public education. Teachers College Press.
17.
DugarovaE. (2020, June). Unpaid care work in times of the COVID-19 crisis: Gendered impacts, emerging evidence and promising policy responses. UN Expert Group Meeting ‘Families in development: Assessing progress, challenges and emerging issues, Focus on modalities for IYF (Vol. 30).
FarmerS.PoulosC. (2015). Tax increment financing in Chicago: Building neoliberal exclusion one school at a time. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513492806
20.
GarcyA. M. (2011). High expense: Disability severity and charter school attendance in Arizona. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v19n6.2011
21.
GilmourA. F.ShanksC.WintersM. A. (2022). Choice, mobility, and classification: Disaggregating the charter school special education gap. Remedial and Special Education, 44(4), 272–282.https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221115421
22.
GreavesE.WilsonD.NairnA. (2023). Marketing and school choice: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 93(6), 825–861. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221141658
23.
GumbsA. P. (2016). m/other ourselves: A Black queer feminist geneaology for radical mothering. In GumbsA. P.MartensC.WilliamsM. (Eds.), Revolutionary mothering: Love on the front lines (pp. 19–31). PM Press.
24.
HancockA. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065
25.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
26.
HarryB.Ocasio-StoutenburgL. (2021). Parent advocacy for lives that matter. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(3), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211036442
27.
HarveyD. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Verso.
28.
HoxbyC. (2002). School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In HoxbyC. M.HoxbyC. M. (Eds.), The economics of school choice (pp. 287–342). University of Chicago Press.
29.
IjalbaE. (2015). Understanding parental engagement in Hispanic mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: Application of a process-model of cultural competence. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 6(1), Article 6. Retrieved from https://fordham.bepress.com/jmer/vol6/iss1/6.
30.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
31.
JabbarH. (2016). Between structure and agency: Contextualizing school leaders’ strategic responses to market pressures. American Journal of Education, 122, 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1086/685850
32.
JenningsJ. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710375688
33.
JessenS. B. (2013). Special education & school choice: The complex effects of small schools, school choice and public high school policy in New York city. Educational Policy, 27(3), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812453997
34.
KesslerL. T. (2005). Transgressive caregiving. Florida State University Law Review, 33(1), 1–88.
35.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publication Inc.
36.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T.MoserM.HenigJ. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002145
37.
Lipman. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Routledge.
38.
LubienskiC. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124507303994
39.
MagnússonG. (2020). Inclusive education and school choice lessons from Sweden. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1603601
40.
MandicS.SandrettoS.HopkinsD.WilsonG.KiddG.García BengoecheaE. (2023). School choice, distance to school and travel to school patterns among adolescents. Journal of Transport & Health, 33, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101704
41.
MastersW. A.SanogoD. (2002). Welfare gains from quality certification of infant foods: Results from a market experiment in Mali. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00361
42.
MaweneD.BalA. (2018). Factors influencing parents’ selection of schools for children with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 313–329.
MommandiW.WelnerK. (2021). School's choice: How charter schools control access and shape enrolment. Teachers College Press.
45.
Ocasio-StoutenburgL.BovedaM. (2024). Who raised you?”: Black women’s indispensable conceptualizations of mothering for theorizing and researching DisCrit. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(9), 2521–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2024.2348808
46.
OECD. (2019). Balancing school choice and equity: An international perspective based on Pisa. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/2592c974-en
PaylsT. (2008). Purposive sampling. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative methods (pp. 697–698). Sage.
49.
PerryL. B.LubienskiC. (2020). Between-school stratification of academic curricular offerings: School decision-making, curriculum policy context, and the educational marketplace. Oxford Review of Education, 46(5), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1739012
50.
PhillippoK. (2019). A contest without winners: How students experience competitive school choice. University of Minnesota Press.
51.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
52.
SenA. (2019). Limited choices: How the school-choice paradigm subverts equal education for students with disabilities. Maryland Law Review, 78(3), 470–510.
53.
SlackK.ManganJ.HughesA.DaviesP. (2014). ‘Hot’, ‘cold’, and ‘warm’ information and higher education decision-making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.741803
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
56.
WaitollerF. R. (2020). Excluded by choice: Urban students with disabilities in the education marketplace. Teachers College Press.
57.
WaitollerF. R. (2025). Students with disabilities in school choice programs: Opportunities for expansion or the Achilles heel? In FontdevilaC.JabbarH.VergerA.ZancajoA. (Eds.), Research handbook on education privatization and marketization (pp. 265–278). Routledge.
58.
WaitollerF. R.LubienskiC. (2019). Disability, race, and the geography of school choice: Towards an intersectional analytical framework. AERA Openhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418822505
59.
WaitollerF. R.LubienskiC. (2024). School choice strategies at the intersection of disability, race, class, and geography. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32(26). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8273
60.
WaitollerF. R.SuperG. (2017). School choice or the politics of desperation? Black and Latinx parents of students with dis/abilities selecting a charter school in Chicago. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(55). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2636
61.
WintersM. A. (2015). Understanding the gap in special education enrollments between charter and traditional public schools: Evidence from Denver. Colorado. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189(15584772
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
