Critical Investigation of Resegregation Patterns in Special Education: Toward an Anti-Racist Special Education Model

Abstract

The resegregation (i.e., overrepresentation) of Black and Latinx students in special education is a longstanding concern of scholars, researchers, and policy makers in the United States. Therefore, we conducted a critical investigation to better understand the causes of resegregation, student experiences in special education, and anti-racist actions to prevent resegregation. Using critical race transformative mixed methods for the expressed aim of advancing social and political action, we synthesized quantitative and qualitative findings from research studies to develop three well-grounded themes: (a) educators make unjust special education referrals; (b) students experience injustices in special education; and (c) teachers and students exercise resistance and agency. Culminating from this research, we propose an anti-racist special education model for teacher educators and policy makers to disrupt resegregation, while providing students with the equitable supports and teaching they need to be successful. Our paper concludes with implications for policy, practice, and research.

Keywords

special education overrepresentation resegregation anti-racist education equity critical race theory QuantCrit DisCrit transformative mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annamma

S. A.

Ferri

B. A.

Connor

D. J.

(2018). Disability critical race theory: Exploring the intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759041

Aronson

Laughter

(2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066

Artiles

(2022). Interdisciplinary notes on the dual nature of disability: Disrupting ideology-ontology circuits in racial disparities research. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377221120106

Artiles

Dorn

Bal

(2016). Objects of protection, enduring nodes of difference: Disability intersections with “other” differences, 1916 to 2016. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 777–820. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X1668060

Baker

(2002). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 663–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00175

Bal

(2018). Culturally responsive positive behavioral interventions and supports: A process-oriented framework for systemic transformation. The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 40(2), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2017.1417579

Bell

N. S.

Codding

(2024). Equity Scenario Response Survey: Understanding teacher candidates’ preparation of their sociopolitical identity. Urban Education, 59(3), 878–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211027616

Bell

N. S.

Collier

Vélez

Ford

D. Y.

(2025). CritSEM: Advancing QuantCrit to examine racialized resegregation in special education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 18(2), 390–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2024.2408538

Bell

N. S.

Soslau

Wilson

(2022). The student teaching equity project: Exploring teacher candidates’ knowledge, skills, and beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248712110398

10.

Billingsley

Bettini

(2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697–744. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654319862495

11.

Blanchett

(2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of white privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0350060

12.

Blanchett

W. J.

(2009). A retrospective examination of urban education: From Brown to theresegregation of African Americans in special education—it is time to “go for broke”. Urban Education, 44(4), 370–388.

13.

Bollen

Pearl

(2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer.

14.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

15.

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483. (1954).

16.

Byrd

C. M.

(2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744 .

17.

Carey

R. L.

Yee

L. S.

DeMatthews

(2018). Power, penalty and critical praxis: Employing intersectionality in educator practices to achieve school equity. The Educational Forum, 82(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1381793

18.

Cavendish

Connor

Gonzalez

Jean-Pierre

Card

(2020). Troubling “the problem” of racial overrepresentation in special education: A commentary and call to rethink research. Educational Review, 72(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1550055

19.

Choi

Sailor

McCart

(2020). Reshaping educational systems to realize the Promise of inclusive education. Forum for International Research in Education, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.32865/FIRE202061179

20.

Cholewa

Goodman

West-Olatunji

Amatea

(2014). A qualitative examination of the impact of culturally responsive educational practices on the psychological well-being of students of color. The Urban Review, 46(4), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014

21.

Collins

Bilge

(2016). Intersectionality (Ser. Key concepts). Polity Press.

22.

Connor

(2009). Breaking containment–the power of narrative knowing: Countering silences within traditional special education research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(5), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701789126

23.

Connor

Cavendish

Gonzalez

Jean-Pierre

(2019). Is a bridge even possible over troubled waters? The field of special education negates the overrepresentation of minority students: A discritanalysis. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(6), 723–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1599343

24.

Connor

D. J.

Danforth

Gallagher

(2024). An open letter to the field: Contemplating special education's collaborative role in developing inclusive education. Exceptional Children, 91(3), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029241303051

25.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8(1), 139–167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

26.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

27.

Cruz

Kulklani

Firestone

(2021). A QuantCrit analysis of context, discipline, special education, and disproportionality. AERA Open, 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421

28.

Cuffee

(2020). The impact of culturally responsive teaching on student engagement. NWCommons. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1255&context=education_masters#:∼:text=Student%20engagement%20was%20observed%20daily,built%20a%20positive%20class%20culture

29.

Da Silva

Hubbard

(2024). Confronting the legacy of eugenics and ableism: Towards anti-ableist bioscience education. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 23(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/0.1187/cbe.23-10-0195

30.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. NYU press.

31.

Diana v. State Board of Education. Civil Action No. C-70-37 (N. D. Cal. 1970).

32.

Duncan-Andrade

(2009). Note to educators: hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 79(2), 181–194.

33.

Dunn

L. M.

(1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35(1), 5–22.

34.

Ferri

B. A.

Bacon

(2011). Beyond inclusion: Disability studies in early childhood teacher education. In B. Fennimore & A. Goodwin (Eds.), Promoting social justice for young children. Educating the young child (Vol. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0570-8_12

35.

Ferri

B. A.

Connor

D. J.

(2005). In the shadow of Brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260020401

36.

Ferri

B. A.

Connor

D. J.

(2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107(3), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00483.x

37.

Fish

R. E.

(2019). Standing out and sorting in: Exploring the role of racial composition in racial disparities in special education. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2573–2608. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219847966

38.

Ford

D. Y.

Russo

(2016). Historical and legal overview of special education overrepresentation: Access and equity denied. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56829/2158-396X.16.1.50

39.

Frankenberg

Siegel-Hawley

(2024). Understanding suburban school segregation: Toward a renewed civil rights agenda. The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA.

40.

Garcia

López

Vélez

(2018). Quantcrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675

41.

Garcia

N. M.

Mayorga

O. J.

(2018). The threat of unexamined secondary data: a critical race transformative convergent mixed methods. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377415

42.

Gillborn

(2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346

43.

Gillborn

Warmington

Demack

(2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘big data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417

44.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.

45.

Gould

S. J.

(1996). The mismeasure of man (Reviewed and expanded). Norton.

46.

Grant

(2014). The boy problem: Educating boys in urban America, 1870-1970. Johns Hopkins University Press.

47.

Harring

J. R.

Mcneish

D. M.

Hancock

G. R.

(2017). Using phantom variables in structural equation modeling to assess model sensitivity to external misspecification. Psychological Methods, 22(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000103

48.

Harry

Klingner

(2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race & disability in schools (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

49.

Hines

D. E.

Bovedo

Lindo

E. J.

(2021). Racism by another Name: Black students, overrepresentation, and the carceral state of special education. Information Age Publishers.

50.

Horton

(2020). Making qualitative data more visible in policy: A critical appraisal of meta-synthesis. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119881953

51.

Johnson

R. E.

Grove

A. L.

Clarke

(2019). Pillar integration process: A joint display technique to integrate data in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817743108

52.

Mawene

Krichevsky

Lim

(2024). Organizing possible futures: A systematic review on dis/ability justice frameworks to design equity-oriented inclusive teacher education programs. Review of Educational Research, 94(6), 883–926. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231212927

53.

Mawene

Lee

Lim

Yoo

(2025). When good intentions go Awry: A critical policy analysis of equity-focused policies intended to reduce racial disparities in special education. Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029241292589

54.

Kohli

Pizarro

Nevárez

(2017). The “new racism” of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686949

55.

Kulkarni

S. S.

(2022). Special education teachers of color and their beliefs about dis/ability and race: Counter-stories of smartness and goodness. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(5), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1938973

56.

Kulkarni

S. S.

Miller

A. L.

Nusbaum

E. A.

Pearson

Brown

L. X.

(2024). Toward disability-centered, culturally sustaining pedagogies in teacher education. Critical Studies in Education, 65(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2023.2234952

57.

Ladson-Billings

(2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the Remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

58.

Ladson-Billings

Tate

(1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700104

59.

Lang

S. N.

Tebben

Luckey

S. W.

Hurns

K. M.

Fox

E. G.

Ford

D. Y.

Ansari

Pasque

P. A.

(2024). Early childhood teachers’ dispositions, knowledge, and skills related to diversity, inclusion, equity, and justice. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 67, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.005

60.

Larry

v. Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Cal. 1972).

61.

Leite

W. L.

Shen

Marcoulides

Fisk

C. L.

Harring

(2022). Using ant colony optimization for sensitivity analysis in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1881786

62.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez- Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA. Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46.

63.

Losen

D. J.

Martinez

Shin

G. H. R.

(2020). Significant disproportionality in special education: Current trends and actions for impact. National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-NCLD- Disproportionality_Trends-and-Actions-for-Impact_FINAL-1.pdf

64.

Mayes

(2023). Unteachables: Disability rights and the invention of black special education. University of Minnesota Press.

65.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Hillemeier

M. M.

Mattison

Maczuga

Cook

(2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15591157

66.

Muthén

Asparouhov

(2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf [Google Scholar].

67.

Najarian

Tourangeau

Nord

Wallner-Allen

(2018). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–11 (ECLSK: 2011), First- and Second-Grade Psychometric Report (NCES 2018-183). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

68.

Nielsen

K. E.

(2012). A disability history of the United States. Beacon Press.

69.

Osgood

(2005). The history of inclusion in the United States. Gallaudet University Press.

70.

Paterson

B. L.

Thorne

S. E.

Canam

Jillings

(2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985017

71.

Pelaez López

(2018, September). The X in Latinx is a wound, not a trend. ColorBloq. https://www.colorbloq.org/article/the-x-in-latinx-is-a-wound-not-a-trend

72.

Pérez Huber

Vélez

V. N.

Solórzano

(2018). More than ‘papelitos:’ a quantcrit counterstory to critique Latina/o degree value and occupational prestige. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377416

73.

Portes

P. R.

González Canché

Boada

Whatley

M. E.

(2017). Early evaluation findings from the instructional conversation study: Culturally responsive teaching outcomes for diverse learners in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 488–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217741089

74.

Sailor

(2017). Equity as a basis for inclusive educational systems change. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2016.12

75.

Sandoval

Cunningham

Jacobs

Warner

(2023). Research and evidence-based best practices for preparing educators for culturally responsive teaching and leading. WestEd .

76.

Schott Foundation. (2015). Black Lives Matter: The Schott 50 state report on public education and black males. https://schottfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/blacklivesmatter2015_0.pdf

77.

Scott

L. A.

Bell

Dayton

Bowman

R. W.

Evans

Grillo

Spence

Layden

S. J.

(2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study. Exceptional Children, 89(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

78.

Selden

(1999). Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America. Teachers College Press.

79.

Skiba

R. J.

Artiles

A. J.

Kozleski

E. B.

Losen

D. J.

Harry

E. G.

(2016). Risks and consequences of oversimplifying educational inequities: A response to Morgan et al. (2015). Educational Researcher, 45(3), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16644606

80.

Stovall

(2023). The gradual and immediate violence of an engineered conflict: School closings, public housing, law enforcement, and the future of black life in Chicago. Teachers College Record, 125(5), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231181804

81.

Strauss

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.

82.

Sullivan

A. L.

Worrell

F. C.

Jimerson

S. R.

(2022). Reconceptualizing school psychology for the 21st century: The future of school psychology in the United States. School Psychology Review, 51(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2139131

83.

Sweetman

Badiee

Creswell

J. W.

(2010). Use of the transformative framework in mixed methods studies. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364610

84.

Tan

Padilla

Mason

E. N.

Sheldon

(2024). Humanizing disability in mathematics education: Forging new paths. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00428-8

85.

Tefera

Artiles

A. J.

Kramarczuk Voulgarides

Aylward

Alvarado

(2023). The aftermath of disproportionality citations: Situating disability-race intersections in historical and spatial contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 60(2), 367–404. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221147007

86.

Thorius

K. A. K.

(2019). Facilitating en/counters with special education’s cloak of benevolence in professional learning to eliminate racial disproportionality in special education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576945

87.

Timulak

(2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802477989

88.

U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Fact sheet: Equity in IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-equity-idea

89.

U.S. Department of Education. (2020–21). Civil rights data collection office for civil rights. https://civilrightsdata.ed.gov/

90.

Waitoller

F. R.

Thorius

K. A. K.

(2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for disability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.03 MB

0.02 MB