This research explored Chinese parents’ perceptions about the learning needs of their Chinese gifted and talented students in New Zealand. This study also explored Chinese parents’ definitions of giftedness and talent. A Q methodology was used to identify the perceptions of 10 Chinese parents whose children had been identified as gifted and/or talented in New Zealand primary schools. These parents were from various regions of China: five from mainland China, three from Hong Kong, and two from Taiwan. Factor analysis was used to investigate the similarities and differences between the perceptions of New Zealand Chinese parents in relation to the learning needs of their Chinese gifted and talented children. Findings revealed that acculturation shaped parents’ perceptions in three key ways: (1) parents who strongly maintained heritage cultural values prioritized academic achievement more than social-emotional development, (2) parents with higher Western cultural adaptation emphasized holistic development, and (3) conflicting acculturation strategies within families led to tensions in educational expectations. These dynamics influenced parenting practices, parental expectations, and the relationship between families and schools. The research also provided a platform for Chinese parents to present their voices about what was happening for them in the New Zealand education system.
BallamN. (2019). Fostering resilience in ‘at-risk’ gifted and talented young people. In SmithS. R. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 319–331). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_14
2.
BallamN.SturgessA. (2019). Meeting the needs of gifted learners who just don’t ‘fit’: Parent perspectives. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 28(2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.687990902583105
3.
BangH.MontgomeryD. (2013). Understanding international graduate students’ acculturation using Q methodology. Journal of College Student Development, 54(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0066
4.
BaracR.BialystokE. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01707.x
5.
BempechatJ.CheungA.LiJ. (2022). Academic socialization from an “informed distance”: Low-income Chinese American adolescents’ perceptions of their immigrant parents’ educational messages. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 124(4), 124–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221093022
6.
BialystokE. (2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 60(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2006008
7.
ChanA. (2018). Transnational parenting practices of Chinese immigrant families in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117691204
8.
ChellapanL.MargrainV. (2013). “If you talk, you are just talking. If I talk is that bragging?” Perspectives of parents with young gifted children in New Zealand. APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2013-002
9.
ChenW. R.ChenM. F. (2020). Practice and evaluation of enrichment programs for the gifted and talented learners. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142942091787
10.
CollC. G.PachterL. M. (2002). Ethnic and minority parenting. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). Erlbaum.
11.
CostiganC. L.HuaJ. M.SuT. F. (2010). Living up to expectations: The strengths and challenges experienced by Chinese Canadian students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573510368941
12.
CostiganC. L.KoryzmaC. M. (2011). Acculturation and adjustment among immigrant Chinese parents: Mediating role of parenting efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021696
13.
CruzA. (2023). Chinese Emotionality in Chinese emic concepts and its relevance for discourse-influences from ecology, thought systems and folk religion. Culture & Psychology, 30(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X23119148
14.
DelauneA.TapperL. (2015). The well-being of gifted young children: Perceptions, pedagogy, and governance. He Kupu, 4(2), 93–106.
FanW.WilliamsC. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302
17.
FordD. Y.ColemanM. R.DavisJ. L. (2014). Racially, ethnically, and linguistically different gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 133–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514533277
18.
GagnéF. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath and beyond. Talent Development and Excellence, 5(1), 5–19.
GaoD.ZhangL.TangY. (2021). Learning-centered moral education in textbooks and teaching practices. In GaoD.ZhangL.TangY. (Eds.), Explorations of Chinese moral education curriculum and textbooks: Curriculum reform and school innovation in China (pp. 67–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1937-3_3
21.
GuoK. (2014). For a better life: The aspirations of Chinese immigrants in parenting. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 12(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2013.843047
HuangG. H.GoveM. (2012). Confucianism and Chinese families: Values and practices in education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_3
24.
HuangC. Y.LambM. E. (2015). Acculturation and parenting in first-generation Chinese immigrants in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114555763
IpM.PangD. (2005). New Zealand Chinese identity: Sojourners, model minority and multiple identities. In LiuJ.McCreanorT.McIntoshT.TeaiwaT. (Eds.), New Zealand Identities: Departures and destinations (pp. 174–190). Victoria University Press.
27.
KramerK. Z.ŞahinE.GongQ. (2021). Parental involvement among first-and second-generation Latin Americans in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 42(7), 1466–1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20948555
28.
LeBouefS.DworkinJ. (2021). First-generation college students and family support: A critical review of empirical research literature. Education Sciences, 11(6), Article 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060294
29.
LiW.XieY. (2020). The influence of family background on educational expectations: A comparative study. Chinese Sociological Review, 52(3), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1738917
30.
Mazzoli SmithL. (2014). Giftedness and globalization: The challenge of cultural diversity for gifted education programmes in a neoliberal educational marketplace. Gifted Education International, 30(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486572
31.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Ministry of Education.
32.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Gifted and talented students: Meeting their needs in New Zealand schools. Learning Media.
33.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Me Kōrero—Let’s talk success. Ka Hikitia—Accelerating Success: The Māori Education Strategy 2013–2017. Ministry of Education.
34.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Tapasā—Cultural competencies framework for teachers of Pacific learners. Ministry of Education.
NgF. F. Y.WeiJ. (2020). Delving into the minds of Chinese parents: What beliefs motivate their learning-related practices?Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12358
39.
PikeK.WrightP.WinkB.FletcherS. (2015). The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19(5), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0350-z
40.
PryceJ. M.KellyM. S.LawingerM. (2019). Conversation club: A group mentoring model for immigrant youth. Youth & Society, 51(7), 879–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18780526
41.
RamloS. E.NewmanI. (2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34(3), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.11.100594
42.
RasoolS.ZhangJ. (2020). Bangladeshi, Indian, and Pakistani parents’ perceptions of their children’s academic achievement in Southwest Florida. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/9337
43.
RenzulliJ. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2
44.
RenzulliJ. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
45.
RileyT. (2019). Being of like-mind: Giftedness in the New Zealand context. In SmithS. R. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 151–169). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_5
ShenC.JiangW. (2023). Parents’ planning, children’s agency and heritage language education: Re-storying the language experiences of three Chinese immigrant families in Australia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1083813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083813
SriprakashA.ProctorH.HuB. (2016). Visible pedagogic work: Parenting, private tutoring and educational advantage in Australia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1061976
50.
Statistics New Zealand. (2004). Report of the review of the measurement of ethnicity. Statistic New Zealand.
StephensonW. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.
54.
TapperL. (2012). Conceptions of giftedness in a global, modern world: Where are we at in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2012. The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2012-007
55.
ThomasD. M.WatsonR. T. (2002). Q-sorting and MIS research: A primer. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00809
56.
UngarM.ConnellyG.LiebenbergL.TheronL. (2019). How schools enhance the development of young people’s resilience. Social Indicators Research, 145, 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1728-8
VialleW. (2013). The ‘Tiger Mother’ factor: Curriculum, schooling and mentoring of Asian students in an Australian context. In PhillipsonS. N.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia (pp. 147–166). Routledge.
WangL. (2023). Possibility of educating ‘global citizens’ through a Chinese national school curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(2), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2186224
61.
WangD.TuX.Rosario de GuzmanM.XiaY. (2023). Parenting beliefs and practices of immigrant Chinese in the Midwestern United States: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Issues, 45(10), 2550–2574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231209045
62.
WardC.MasgoretA. M. (2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: A social psychological analysis. International Migration Review, 42(1), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00119.x
63.
WattsS.StennerP. (2005). The subjective experience of partnership love: A Q methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X23473
64.
WebberM. J.McKinleyE.HattieJ. (2013). The importance of race and ethnicity: An exploration of New Zealand Pākehā, Māori, Samoan and Chinese adolescent identity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 17–28.
65.
WongM.MortonM. (2017). Parents’ lived experiences of teachers’ construction of giftedness. In PlowsV.WhitburnB. (Eds.), Inclusive education: Making sense of everyday practice (pp. 213–229). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/9789463008662_015
66.
YaoZ.HopeJ. (2023). The role of heritage culture and language learning in nurturing gifted Chinese students in New Zealand schools. In WangD.EastM. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese in the anglophone world (pp. 103–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35475-5_7
67.
YaoZ.RawlinsonC.HamiltonR. (2024). Listen to the voices of gifted Chinese students in New Zealand: A culturally responsive framework. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698622311937
68.
YoonS. Y.GentryM. (2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330564
69.
YuS.WangD. (2022). Quantitative SWOT analysis on factors influencing the sustainable development of non-academic education in China’s open universities: A case study of Beijing open university. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013016
ZhangG.JianX.YuY.TaoY. (2023). Blood is thicker than water: Filial piety and grand travel experiences of Generation Z. Journal of China Tourism Research, 19(4), 926–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2023.2169427
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
