Expanding Literacy: Caregiver Experiences With Literacy Engagement for Their Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Historically, research exploring the literacy experiences of learners with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) has prioritized systematic, multicomponent instruction that emphasizes the development of traditional reading and writing skills. However, this approach may inadvertently facilitate literacy gatekeeping and limit opportunities for literacy learning that focuses on meaning making for students who do not demonstrate specific, conventional reading, writing, and communication skills. To explore conceptions of literacy beyond these traditional frameworks, in this interpretivist, qualitative study, we leveraged a multiliteracies framework and the concept of presumption of competence to interview 24 parents of elementary children with IDD to learn about their child’s literacy engagement, definitions of literacy, and family literacy practices. Our findings highlight how caregivers had traditional framings of literacy when describing their definition of literacy but went on to describe more expansive representations of literacy in their home literacy experiences. These activities went beyond traditional framings of literacy activities for learners with IDD and included: (a) communication and connection, (b) environmental access, (c) embracing music and the arts, and (d) culture and community. Implications for research and practice to improve literacy learning for students with IDD are discussed.

Keywords

literacy content-academic area qualitative research parents families intellectual and developmental disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afacan

Wilkerson

K. L.

Ruppar

A. L.

(2018). Multicomponent Reading intervention for students with intellectual disability. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517702444

Allor

J. H.

Mathes

P. G.

Champlin

Cheatham

J. P.

(2009). Research based techniques for teaching early Reading skills to students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(3), 356–366.

Allor

Mathes

Roberts

Cheatham

Champlin

(2010). Comprehensive Reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20482

Armstrong

B. J.

(2004). Boulevard of Broken Dreams [Song]. On American Idiot. Reprise.

Ayres

Lowery

K. A.

Douglas

Sievers

(2011). I can identify Saturn but I can't brush my teeth: What happens when focus for students with severe disabilities shifts. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 11–21.

Bhattacharya

(2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.

Biklen

Burke

(2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500540376

Bock

A. K.

Erickson

K. A.

(2015). The influence of teacher epistemology and practices on student engagement in literacy learning. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915591987

Boveda

Annamma

S. A.

(2023). Beyond making a statement: An intersectional framing of the power and possibilities of positioning. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231167149

10.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

11.

Browder

D. M.

Wakeman

S. Y.

Spooner

Ahlgrim-Delzell

Algozzine

(2006). Research on Reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200401

12.

Cervetti

Damico

Pearson

P. D.

(2006). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_12

13.

Chandler-Olcott

Kluth

P. M.

(2008). Mother’s voice was the main source of learning”: Parents’ role in supporting the literacy development of students with autism. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(4), 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802659152

14.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

15.

Cope

Kalantzis

(Ed.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.

16.

Cope

Kalantzis

(2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). Springer.

17.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. P.

(2011). Mixed methods research. Sage.

18.

Danforth

(2008). John Dewey’s contributions to an educational philosophy of intellectual disability. Educational Theory, 58(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00275.x

19.

Doak

(2024). ‘To start talking phonics is crazy:’ how parents understand ‘literacy’ in the lives of children with learning disabilities. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 32(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.2010121

20.

Erickson

K. A.

(2017). Comprehensive literacy instruction, interprofessional collaborative practice, and students with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0067

21.

Flewitt

Nind

Payler

(2009). ‘If she’s left with books she’ll just eat them’: Considering inclusive multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105587

22.

Gillanders

Barak

(2022). In their own words: Parents’ voices about a book-provision program. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 24(4), 862-889. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984221108267

23.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, Reading, and Reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

24.

Heath

S. B.

(1983). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. In Tannen

(Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 91–117). Ablex.

25.

Hunt

McDonnell

Crockett

M. A.

(2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812804153471

26.

Keefe

E. S.

(2022). From detractive to democratic: The duty of teacher education to disrupt structural ableism and reimagine disability. Teachers College Record, 124(3), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221086994

27.

Keefe

E. B.

Copeland

S. R.

(2011). What is literacy? The power of a definition. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3-4), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824507

28.

Kleekamp

M. C.

(2021). Reimaging isolated literacy classrooms as interdependent networks: Tracing rituals, repetitions, and technologies. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211022687

29.

Kliewer

(2008). Seeing all kids as readers: A new vision for literacy in the inclusive early childhood classroom. Brookes.

30.

Kliewer

Biklen

(2001). School’s not really a place for “Reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.26.1.1

31.

Kliewer

Biklen

(2007). Enacting literacy: Local understanding, significant disability, and a new frame for educational opportunity. Teachers College Record, 109(12), 2579–2600. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710901202

32.

Kliewer

Biklen

Kasa-Hendrickson

(2006). Who may be literate? Disability and resistance to the cultural denial of competence. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002163

33.

Koppenhaver

Coleman

Kalman

Yoder

(1991). The implications of emergent literacy research for children with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0101.38

34.

Krishnan

(2021). The role of multiliteracies in changing learning spaces and promoting self-advocacy for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211010307

35.

Lynch

Anderson

Shapiro

(2006). Parents’ beliefs about young children's literacy development and parents’ literacy behaviors. Reading Psychology, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710500468708

36.

Muhammad

(2020). Cultivating Genius: An equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic.

37.

Muhammad

Mosely

(2021). Why we need identity and equity learning in literacy practices: Moving research, practice, and policy forward. Language Arts, 98(4), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.58680/la202131154

38.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Leech

N. L.

(2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238–254.

39.

Paris

Alim

H. S.

(Ed.) (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

40.

Perry

K. H.

(2012). What is literacy? –A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 50–71.

41.

Purcell-Gates

Perry

K. H.

Briseño

(2011). Analyzing literacy practice: Grounded theory to model. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201115256

42.

Rose

(2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500407

43.

Ruppar

A. L.

(2015). A preliminary study of the literacy experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514558095

44.

Scarborough

(2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later Reading (dis)abilities. In Neuman

S. B.

Dickinson

D. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). The Guilford Press.

45.

Senechal

LeFevre

(2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s Reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417

46.

Sparrow

Cicchetti

(1989). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Allyn & Bacon.

47.

Street

(1993). Introduction: The new literacy studies. In Street

(Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1–21). Cambridge University Press.

48.

Taylor

McDonough

(2021). Safeguarding the epistemic agency of intellectually disabled learners. Philosophy of Education, 77(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.47925/77.1.24

49.

Trainor

A. A.

Graue

(2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100

50.

Waitoller

F. R.

Thorius

K. K.

(Ed.) (2023). Sustaining disabled youth: Centering disability in asset pedagogies. Teachers College Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB