This study examined the diversity in feelings of loneliness among high-ability students. Individual differences (intelligence level, giftedness label, and personality) and differences in the social context (peer acceptance, peer rejection, victimization, and friendship quantity) of adolescents were considered as predictors of loneliness. Additionally, gender differences were investigated in both the level of loneliness and in the effect of social-context characteristics on loneliness. The sample consisted of 403 students belonging to the top 10% of their age group in terms of cognitive ability (Mage = 12.4 years, 50.3% males). Variables were measured longitudinally across four time points during two consecutive school years using self-report and peer nominations. Multilevel growth curve analyses revealed that all predictors except giftedness label and peer rejection uniquely predicted loneliness over time. Gender differences were found for the effects of peer rejection and victimization. These findings highlight the diversity of social experiences among high-ability youth and emphasize the importance of both individual and contextual factors in shaping these distinct experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsherS. R.PaquetteJ. A. (2003). Loneliness and peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01233
BaudsonT. G.PreckelF. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216647115
4.
BoumanT.van der MeulenM.GoossensF. A.OlthofT.VermandeM. M.AlevaE. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004
5.
BueckerS.MaesM.DenissenJ. J. A.LuhmannM. (2020). Loneliness and the Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 34, 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2229
6.
BukowskiW. M.HozaB. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measures, and outcome. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relations in child development (pp. 15–45). Wiley.
7.
CashT.LinT. (2022). Psychological well-being of intellectually and academically gifted students in self-contained and pull-out gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987
8.
ChanD. W. (2002). Perceptions of giftedness and self-concepts among junior secondary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015478015956
9.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.CoppotelliH. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
12.
ColemanL. J.MickoK. J.CrossT. L. (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607322
13.
CrossD.ShawT.EpsteinM.PearceN.BarnesA.BurnsS.WatersS.LesterL.RunionsK. (2018). Impact of the Friendly Schools whole-school intervention on transition to secondary school and adolescent bullying behaviour. European Journal of Education, 53, 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12307
14.
DanneelS.GeukensF.MaesM.BastinM.BijttebierP.ColpinH.VerschuerenK.GoossensL. (2020). Loneliness, social anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms in adolescence: Longitudinal distinctiveness and correlated change. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 2246–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01315-w
EcclesJ.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.Miller BuchananC.FlanaganC.Mac IverD. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00036-3
17.
EcclesA. M.QualterP. (2021). Alleviating loneliness in young people: A meta-analysis of interventions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12389
18.
FeldhusenJ.DaiD. (1997). Gifted students’ attitudes and perceptions of the gifted label, special programs, and peer relations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x9700900103
19.
GagnéF. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 2–9). Prufrock.
20.
GeukensF.MaesM.SpithovenA.PouwelsL. J.DanneelS.CillessenA. H. N.van den BergY. H. M.GoossensL. (2020). Changes in adolescent loneliness and concomitant changes in fear of negative evaluation and self-esteem. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420958194
21.
Gifford-SmithM. E.BrownellC. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
22.
GoossensL. (2016). LEKA (Leuvense Eenzaamheidsschaal voor Kinderen en Adolescenten) [LACA: Loneliness and Aloneness Scale for Children and Adolescents]. Acco.
23.
GuignardJ.BacroF.GuimardP. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 179. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448
HellerK. A.PerlethC.LimT. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 147–170). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.010.
26.
HunterS. C.BoyleJ. M. E. (2004). Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904322848833
KerrB. A.McKayR. (2014). Smart girls in the 21st century: Understanding talented girls and women. Great Potential Press.
29.
KerrB. A.MultonK. D. (2015). The development of gender identity, gender roles, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00194.x
30.
KoširK.HorvatM.AramU.JurinecN. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186
31.
LaddG. W.Kochenderfer-LaddB. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.74
32.
LarsenL.HartmanP.NyborgH. (2008). The stability of general intelligence from early adulthood to middle-age. Intelligence, 36(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.01.001
LodderG. M. A.ScholteR. H. J.GoossensL.VerhagenM. (2017). Loneliness in early adolescence: Friendship quantity, friendship quality, and dyadic processes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(5), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1070352
36.
LuftigR. L.NicholsM. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400305
37.
MaesM.QualterP.VanhalstJ.van den NoortgateW.GoossensL. (2019). Gender differences in loneliness across the lifespan: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 654, 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2220
38.
MagezW.TierensM.van HuynegemJ.van ParijsK.DecaluwéV.BosA. (2015). CoVaT-CHC: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model [CoVaT-CHC: Cognitive ability test based on the CHC-model]. Thomas More.
39.
MarcoenA.GoossensL.CaesP. (1987). Loneliness in pre- through late adolescence: Exploring the contributions of a multidimensional approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(6), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02138821
40.
MatheisS.KellerL. K.KronborgL.SchmittM.PreckelF. (2020). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029
41.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.
42.
MuellerC. E.WinsorD. L. (2018). Depression, suicide, and giftedness: Disentangling risk factors, protective factors, and implications for optimal growth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 255–284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8.
43.
NeihartM. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991
44.
NeihartM.YeoL. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497–510). American Psychological Association.
45.
NewcombA. F.BukowskiW. M.PatteeL. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99
46.
OguruU.OzbeyA. (2021). Personality differences in gifted versus non-gifted individuals: A three-level meta-analysis. High-Ability Studies, 33(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2021.1985438
47.
OlweusD. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
48.
PeairsK. F.PutallazM.CostanzoP. R. (2019). From A (aggression) to V (victimization): Peer status and adjustment among academically gifted students in early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219838973
49.
PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1–18). Wiley.
50.
PetersonJ. S.RayK. E. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000206
51.
PluckerJ.CallahanC. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244
52.
Prodia. (2019). Visietekst: Waarom is een label hoogbegaafdheid niet meer houdbaar? Op weg naar een grotere focus op onderwijsbehoeften [Why is a gifted label no longer tenable? Towards a greater focus on educational needs]. Project Protocollering diagnostiek, Prodia Diagnostiek. https://www.prodiagnostiek.be/wpcontent/uploads/2023/10/CSF_waaromgeenlabel.pdf
53.
ReisS. M. (2002). Gifted females in elementary and secondary school. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and motivational development of gifted children: What do we know? (1st ed., pp. 125–135). Prufrock.
54.
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824
55.
RinnA. N.MajorityK. L. (2018). The social and emotional world of the gifted. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 49–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.BowkerJ. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. H. Bornstein, T. Leventhal, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 175–222). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405.
58.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.ParkerJ. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571–645). Wiley.
SchneiderW. J.McGrewK. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). Guilford Press.
61.
SebastianC.BurnettS.BlakemoreS. J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008
62.
SilvermanL. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 31–39). Prufrock Press.
StorchE. A.Masia-WarnerC. (2004). The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.003
65.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
66.
TeppersE.KlimstraT. A.van DammeC.LuyckxK.VanhalstJ.GoossensL. (2013). Personality traits, loneliness, and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513481445
67.
TerryR. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88, 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23220008805
68.
TierensM. (2017). Onderzoeksrapport constructvaliditeit [Scientific report on construct validity]. Antwerp: Thomas More.
69.
VanhalstJ.GoossensL.LuyckxK.ScholteR. H. J.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2013). The development of loneliness from mid- to late adolescence: Trajectory classes, personality traits, and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.002
70.
VanhalstJ.LuyckxK.GoossensL. (2014). Experiencing loneliness in adolescence: A matter of individual characteristics, negative peer experiences, or both?Social Development, 23(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12019
71.
van RossenJ. M.HornstraL.PoorthuisA. M. G. (2021). High-ability students in pull-out programs and regular classes: A longitudinal study on perceived social relationships in two settings. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.007
72.
VermulstA. A.GerrisJ. R. M. (2005). Quick Big Five personality test manual. Leeuwarden: LDC.
73.
VerschuerenK.LavrijsenJ.WeynsT.RamosA.de FraineB. (2019). Social acceptance of high-ability youth: Multiple perspectives and contextual influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20316
74.
VialleW. (2007). Pink or Paris? Giftedness in the popular culture. Australian Journal of Gifted Education, 16, 5–11. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/907
75.
WeynsT.PreckelF.VerschuerenK. (2021). Teachers-in-training perceptions of gifted children’s characteristics and teacher-child interactions: An experimental study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215
YoungJ. E. (1981). Cognitive therapy and loneliness.Guilford Press.
78.
ZhangF.YouZ.FanC.GaoC.CohenR.HsuehY.ZhouZ. (2014). Friendship quality, social preference, proximity prestige, and self-perceived social competence: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
