Differences in Loneliness Experiences Among High-Ability Students: Individual and Social Context Predictors

Abstract

This study examined the diversity in feelings of loneliness among high-ability students. Individual differences (intelligence level, giftedness label, and personality) and differences in the social context (peer acceptance, peer rejection, victimization, and friendship quantity) of adolescents were considered as predictors of loneliness. Additionally, gender differences were investigated in both the level of loneliness and in the effect of social-context characteristics on loneliness. The sample consisted of 403 students belonging to the top 10% of their age group in terms of cognitive ability (M_age = 12.4 years, 50.3% males). Variables were measured longitudinally across four time points during two consecutive school years using self-report and peer nominations. Multilevel growth curve analyses revealed that all predictors except giftedness label and peer rejection uniquely predicted loneliness over time. Gender differences were found for the effects of peer rejection and victimization. These findings highlight the diversity of social experiences among high-ability youth and emphasize the importance of both individual and contextual factors in shaping these distinct experiences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asher

S. R.

Paquette

J. A.

(2003). Loneliness and peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01233

Baudson

(2016). The mad genius stereotype: Still alive and well. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368

Baudson

T. G.

Preckel

(2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216647115

Bouman

van der Meulen

Goossens

F. A.

Olthof

Vermande

M. M.

Aleva

E. A.

(2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004

Buecker

Maes

Denissen

J. J. A.

Luhmann

(2020). Loneliness and the Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 34, 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2229

Bukowski

W. M.

Hoza

(1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measures, and outcome. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relations in child development (pp. 15–45). Wiley.

Cash

Lin

(2022). Psychological well-being of intellectually and academically gifted students in self-contained and pull-out gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987

Chan

D. W.

(2002). Perceptions of giftedness and self-concepts among junior secondary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015478015956

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Marks

P. E. L.

(2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad

10.

Cobb-Clark

Schurer

(2012). The stability of the Big-Five personality traits. Economic Letters, 115, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.015

11.

Coie

J. D.

Dodge

K. A.

Coppotelli

(1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557

12.

Coleman

L. J.

Micko

K. J.

Cross

T. L.

(2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607322

13.

Cross

Shaw

Epstein

Pearce

Barnes

Burns

Waters

Lester

Runions

(2018). Impact of the Friendly Schools whole-school intervention on transition to secondary school and adolescent bullying behaviour. European Journal of Education, 53, 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12307

14.

Danneel

Geukens

Maes

Bastin

Bijttebier

Colpin

Verschueren

Goossens

(2020). Loneliness, social anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms in adolescence: Longitudinal distinctiveness and correlated change. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 2246–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01315-w

15.

Dauber

S. L.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 10–14. https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/smpy/1990-dauber.pdf https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400103

16.

Eccles

Midgley

Wigfield

Miller Buchanan

Flanagan

Mac Iver

(1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00036-3

17.

Eccles

A. M.

Qualter

(2021). Alleviating loneliness in young people: A meta-analysis of interventions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12389

18.

Feldhusen

Dai

(1997). Gifted students’ attitudes and perceptions of the gifted label, special programs, and peer relations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x9700900103

19.

Gagné

(2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 2–9). Prufrock.

20.

Geukens

Maes

Spithoven

Pouwels

L. J.

Danneel

Cillessen

A. H. N.

van den Berg

Y. H. M.

Goossens

(2020). Changes in adolescent loneliness and concomitant changes in fear of negative evaluation and self-esteem. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420958194

21.

Gifford-Smith

M. E.

Brownell

C. A.

(2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7

22.

Goossens

(2016). LEKA (Leuvense Eenzaamheidsschaal voor Kinderen en Adolescenten) [LACA: Loneliness and Aloneness Scale for Children and Adolescents]. Acco.

23.

Guignard

Bacro

Guimard

(2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 179. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448

24.

Händel

Vialle

Ziegler

(2013). Student perceptions of high-achieving classmates. High Ability Studies, 24(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2013.843139

25.

Heller

K. A.

Perleth

Lim

T. K.

(2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 147–170). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.010.

26.

Hunter

S. C.

Boyle

J. M. E.

(2004). Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904322848833

27.

Kerr

B. A.

Colangelo

Gaeth

(1988). Gifted adolescents’ attitudes toward their giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200201

28.

Kerr

B. A.

McKay

(2014). Smart girls in the 21st century: Understanding talented girls and women. Great Potential Press.

29.

Kerr

B. A.

Multon

K. D.

(2015). The development of gender identity, gender roles, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00194.x

30.

Košir

Horvat

Aram

Jurinec

(2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186

31.

Ladd

G. W.

Kochenderfer-Ladd

(2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.74

32.

Larsen

Hartman

Nyborg

(2008). The stability of general intelligence from early adulthood to middle-age. Intelligence, 36(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.01.001

33.

Lee

S.-Y.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Turner Thomson

(2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212442568

34.

Link

Phelan

(2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

35.

Lodder

G. M. A.

Scholte

R. H. J.

Goossens

Verhagen

(2017). Loneliness in early adolescence: Friendship quantity, friendship quality, and dyadic processes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(5), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1070352

36.

Luftig

R. L.

Nichols

M. L.

(1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400305

37.

Maes

Qualter

Vanhalst

van den Noortgate

Goossens

(2019). Gender differences in loneliness across the lifespan: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 654, 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2220

38.

Magez

Tierens

van Huynegem

van Parijs

Decaluwé

Bos

(2015). CoVaT-CHC: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model [CoVaT-CHC: Cognitive ability test based on the CHC-model]. Thomas More.

39.

Marcoen

Goossens

Caes

(1987). Loneliness in pre- through late adolescence: Exploring the contributions of a multidimensional approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(6), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02138821

40.

Matheis

Keller

L. K.

Kronborg

Schmitt

Preckel

(2020). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029

41.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.

42.

Mueller

C. E.

Winsor

D. L.

(2018). Depression, suicide, and giftedness: Disentangling risk factors, protective factors, and implications for optimal growth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 255–284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8.

43.

Neihart

(1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991

44.

Neihart

Yeo

L. S.

(2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497–510). American Psychological Association.

45.

Newcomb

A. F.

Bukowski

W. M.

Pattee

(1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99

46.

Oguru

Ozbey

(2021). Personality differences in gifted versus non-gifted individuals: A three-level meta-analysis. High-Ability Studies, 33(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2021.1985438

47.

Olweus

(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.

48.

Peairs

K. F.

Putallaz

Costanzo

P. R.

(2019). From A (aggression) to V (victimization): Peer status and adjustment among academically gifted students in early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219838973

49.

Peplau

L. A.

Perlman

(1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1–18). Wiley.

50.

Peterson

J. S.

Ray

K. E.

(2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000206

51.

Plucker

Callahan

(2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244

52.

Prodia. (2019). Visietekst: Waarom is een label hoogbegaafdheid niet meer houdbaar? Op weg naar een grotere focus op onderwijsbehoeften [Why is a gifted label no longer tenable? Towards a greater focus on educational needs]. Project Protocollering diagnostiek, Prodia Diagnostiek. https://www.prodiagnostiek.be/wpcontent/uploads/2023/10/CSF_waaromgeenlabel.pdf

53.

Reis

S. M.

(2002). Gifted females in elementary and secondary school. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and motivational development of gifted children: What do we know? (1st ed., pp. 125–135). Prufrock.

54.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824

55.

Rinn

A. N.

Majority

K. L.

(2018). The social and emotional world of the gifted. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 49–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8.

56.

Roth

Becker

Romeyke

Schafer

Domnick

Spinath

F. M.

(2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intelligence.2015.09.002

57.

Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Bowker

J. C.

(2015). Children in peer groups. In M. H. Bornstein, T. Leventhal, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 175–222). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405.

58.

Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Parker

J. G.

(2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571–645). Wiley.

59.

Ryoo

J. H.

Wang

Swearer

Park

(2017). Investigation of transitions in bullying/victimization statuses of gifted and general education students. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 396–411. https://doi.og/10.1177/0014402917698500 https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917698500

60.

Schneider

W. J.

McGrew

K. S.

(2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). Guilford Press.

61.

Sebastian

Burnett

Blakemore

S. J.

(2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008

62.

Silverman

L. K.

(2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 31–39). Prufrock Press.

63.

Steinberg

Morris

A. S.

(2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83

64.

Storch

E. A.

Masia-Warner

(2004). The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.003

65.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

66.

Teppers

Klimstra

T. A.

van Damme

Luyckx

Vanhalst

Goossens

(2013). Personality traits, loneliness, and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513481445

67.

Terry

(2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88, 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23220008805

68.

Tierens

(2017). Onderzoeksrapport constructvaliditeit [Scientific report on construct validity]. Antwerp: Thomas More.

69.

Vanhalst

Goossens

Luyckx

Scholte

R. H. J.

Engels

R. C. M. E.

(2013). The development of loneliness from mid- to late adolescence: Trajectory classes, personality traits, and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.002

70.

Vanhalst

Luyckx

Goossens

(2014). Experiencing loneliness in adolescence: A matter of individual characteristics, negative peer experiences, or both? Social Development, 23(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12019

71.

van Rossen

J. M.

Hornstra

Poorthuis

A. M. G.

(2021). High-ability students in pull-out programs and regular classes: A longitudinal study on perceived social relationships in two settings. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.007

72.

Vermulst

A. A.

Gerris

J. R. M.

(2005). Quick Big Five personality test manual . Leeuwarden: LDC.

73.

Verschueren

Lavrijsen

Weyns

Ramos

de Fraine

(2019). Social acceptance of high-ability youth: Multiple perspectives and contextual influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20316

74.

Vialle

(2007). Pink or Paris? Giftedness in the popular culture. Australian Journal of Gifted Education, 16, 5–11. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/907

75.

Weyns

Preckel

Verschueren

(2021). Teachers-in-training perceptions of gifted children’s characteristics and teacher-child interactions: An experimental study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215

76.

Woodhouse

S. S.

Dykas

M. J.

Cassidy

(2012). Loneliness and peer relations in adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00611.x

77.

Young

J. E.

(1981). Cognitive therapy and loneliness .Guilford Press.

78.

Zhang

You

Fan

Gao

Cohen

Hsueh

Zhou

(2014). Friendship quality, social preference, proximity prestige, and self-perceived social competence: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.001

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB