We tested the efficacy of a comprehensive intervention program designed for high school students across the autism spectrum, the Center on Secondary Education for Students with Autism (CSESA) model, in a cluster randomized control trial involving 60 high schools in three states (California, North Carolina, Wisconsin), with implementation occurring over a 2-year period. We examined outcomes for the schools, students (N = 547), and families. At the conclusion of the study, CSESA schools had significantly higher program quality than the services-as-usual (SAU) schools. In addition, students in the CSESA schools had significantly higher total attainment of educational goals than students in SAU schools. There were not significant differences between the two groups on standardized assessment outcomes. We discuss implications for intervention implementation and future research with this population in the public school context.
BaconE. C.DufekS.SchreibmanL.StahmerA. C.PierceK.CourchesneE. (2014). Measuring outcome in an early intervention program for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: Use of a curriculum-based assessment. Autism Research and Treatment, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/964704
3.
BarnettW. S. (2011). Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science, 333(6045), 975–978.
4.
BédécarratsF.GuérinI.RoubaudF. (2017). All that glitters is not gold: The political economy of randomized evaluations in development. Development and Change,50(3), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12378
5.
BerumentS. K.RutterM.LordC.PicklesA.BaileyA. (1999). Autism Screening Questionnaire: Diagnostic validity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175(5), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.175.5.444
6.
BoydB. A.WatsonL. R.ReszkaS. S.SiderisJ.AlessandriM.BaranekG. T.CraisE. R.DonaldsonA.GutierrezA.JohnsonL.BelardiK. (2018). Efficacy of the ASAP intervention for preschoolers with ASD: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 3144–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3584-z
7.
BrowderD.WakemanS. Y.FlowersC.RickelmanR. J.PugaleeD.KarvonenM. (2007). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410010101
CarterE. W.CommonE. A.SreckovicM. A.HuberH. B.Bottema-BeutelK.GustafsonJ. R.DykstraJ.HumeK. (2014). Promoting social competence and peer relationships for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419332513514618
10.
CarterE. W.Dykstra SteinbrennerJ. R.HallL. J. (2019). Exploring feasibility and fit: Peer-mediated interventions for high school students with autism spectrum disorders. School Psychology Review, 48(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0112.V48-2
ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.McCoachD. B. (2009). Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the Usage Rating Profile–Intervention (URP-I). School Psychology Quarterly, 24(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015146
14.
ConstantinoJ. N.GruberC. P. (2012). Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2. Western Psychological Services.
15.
DaWaltL. S.GreenbergJ. S.MailickM. R. (2018). Transitioning together: A multi-family group psychoeducation program for adolescents with ASD and their parents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(1), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3307-x
16.
Dryden-PalmerK. D.ParshuramC. S.BertaW. B. (2020). Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: A realist informed review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4935-y
17.
FleuryV. P.HedgesS.HumeK.BrowderD.ThompsonJ.FallinK.El ZeinF.ReutebuchC.VaughnS. (2014). Addressing the academic needs of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in secondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518823
18.
HawesK. M. (2015). An examination of standards-based education relative to research-based practices in instruction and assessment. University of Southern Maine. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd/171
19.
HowlinP. (2014). Outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders. In VolkmarF.RogersS.PaulR.PelphreyK. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, fourth edition (pp. 97–116). Wiley.
20.
HumeK.BoydB. A.HammJ. V.KucharczykS. (2014). Supporting independence in adolescents on the autism spectrum. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513514617
21.
HumeK.Dykstra SteinbrennerJ.SiderisJ.SmithL.KucharczykS.SzidonK. (2018). Multi-informant assessment of transition-related skills and skill importance in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 22(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317722029
22.
KasariC.SmithT. (2013). Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: Methods and recommendations. Autism, 17(3), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312470496
23.
KennyL.HattersleyC.MolinsB.BuckleyC.PoveyC.PellicanoE. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200
24.
KiresukT. J.ShermanR. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530764
25.
KnightV. F.HuberH. B.KuntzE. M.CarterE. W.JuarezA. P. (2019). Instructional practices, priorities, and preparedness for educating students with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755694
26.
KorenP. E.DeChilloN.FriesenB. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079106
27.
KraemerB. R.OdomS. L.TomaszewskiB.HallL. J.DawaltL.HumeK. A.SteinbrennerJ. R.SzidonK.BrumC. (2020). Quality of high school programs for students with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 24(3), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319887280
LipscombS.HamisonJ.Liu AlbertY.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Vol. 2: Comparisons across disability groups. Full report (NCEE 2017-4018). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580934.pdf
30.
Lortie-ForguesH.InglisM. (2019). Rigorous large-scale educational RCTs are often uninformative: Should we be concerned?Educational Researcher, 48(3), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19832850
31.
MaennerM. J.ShawK. A.BaioJ. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 69(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1
32.
MandellD. S.StahmerA. C.ShinS.XieM.ReisingerE.MarcusS. C. (2013). The role of treatment fidelity on outcomes during a randomized field trial of an autism intervention. Autism, 17(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312473666
33.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.ZhangJ.WangX.WangK.HeinS.DilibertiM.Forrest CataldiE.Bullock MannF.BarmerA. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144
34.
McNeillJ. (2019). Social validity and teachers’ use of evidence-based practices for autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(11), 4585–4594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04190-y
35.
OdomS. L.BoydB.HallL.HumeK. (2014). Comprehensive treatment models for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. In VolkmarF.RogersS.PelphreyK.PaulR. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (Vol. 2, pp. 770–778). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118911389
36.
OdomS. L.CoxA.SiderisJ.HumeK. A.HedgesS.KucharczykS., Shaw, E., Boyd, B., Reszka, S., & Neitzel, J. (2018). Assessing quality of program environments for children and youth with autism: Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3379-7
37.
PrataJ.LawsonN.CoelhoR. (2019). Stress factors in parents of children on the autism spectrum: An integrative model approach. International Journal of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21035/ijcnmh.2019.6.2
38.
ReutebuchC. K.El ZeinF.KimM. K.WeinbergA. N.VaughnS. (2015). Investigating a reading comprehension intervention for high school students with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.002
39.
RoidG. H.MillerL. J.KochC. (2013). Leiter International Performance Scale. Stoelting.
40.
RubleL. A.DalrympleN. J.McGrewJ. H. (2010). The effects of consultation on individualized education program outcomes for young children with autism: The collaborative model for promoting competence and success. Journal of Early Intervention, 32(4), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815110382973
41.
RubleL.McGrewJ. H.TolandM. D. (2012). Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1446-7
42.
RubleL. A.McGrewJ. H.TolandM.DalrympleN.AdamsM.Snell-RoodC. (2018). Randomized control trial of COMPASS for improving transition outcomes of students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 3586–3595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3623-9
43.
SamA. M.CoxA. W.SavageM. N.WatersV.OdomS. L. (2020). Disseminating information on evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: AFIRM. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(6), 1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03945-x
44.
SamA. M.OdomS. L.TomaszewskiB.PerkinsY.CoxA. W. (2021). Employing evidence-based practices for children with autism in elementary schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(7), 2308–2323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04706-x
45.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.BallaD. A. (2006). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Teacher rating form manual. Pearson.
46.
SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.HallL. J.HumeK. (2020). Moving beyond fidelity: Assessing implementation of a comprehensive treatment program for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Exceptional Children, 86(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919855321
47.
StichterJ. P.HerzogM. J.OwensS. A.MalugenE. (2016). Manualization, feasibility, and effectiveness of the school-based Social Competence Intervention for Adolescents (SCI-A). Psychology in the Schools, 53(6), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21928
48.
StylesB.,TorgersonC. (2018). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in education research: Methodological debates, questions, challenges. Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1500194
49.
SuhrheinrichJ.RiethS. R.DicksonK. S.RoeschS.StahmerA. C. (2020). Classroom pivotal response teaching: Teacher training outcomes of a community efficacy trial. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419850876
50.
SulekR.TrembathD.PaynterJ.KeenD. (2019). Social validity or an online tool to support transitions to primary school for children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101408
51.
TaylorJ. L.HenningerN. A.MailickM. R. (2015). Longitudinal patterns of employment and postsecondary education for adults with autism and average-range IQ. Autism, 19(7), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315585643
52.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
53.
TestD. W.SmithL. E.CarterE. W. (2014). Equipping youth with autism spectrum disorders for adulthood: Promoting rigor, relevance, and relationships. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513514857
54.
ThissenD.SteinbergL.KuangD. (2002). Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027001077
55.
ThompsonJ. R.BryantB.CampbellE. M.CraigE. M.HughesC.RotholtzD. A.SchalockR.SilvermanW.TasséM.WehmeyerM. (2004). Supports Intensity Scale user’s manual. American Association on Mental Retardation.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
58.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuboisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR self-determination scale and user guide. American Institute for Research.
59.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS., Brock, M. E., Plavnick, J. B., Fleury, V. P. & Schultz, (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
60.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Riverside.
61.
ZaritS.OrrN. K.ZaritJ. M. (1985). The hidden victims of Alzheimer’s disease: Families under stress. NYU Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
