Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often have difficulties initiating and maintaining reciprocal conversations with others. In this study, we examined if an interdependent group contingency would improve reciprocal conversation of children with ASD when they were paired as conversational partners. We also assessed children’s social preference through their choices between spending time with their peers or by themselves. In a multiple-baseline design, we found that the group contingency immediately produced independent reciprocal conversational responses, sustained conversational exchanges, and increased preference for peers across all participants. Improvements were further maintained even after the group contingency was removed and novel peers were introduced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
2.
BambaraL. M.ColeC. L.KunschC.TsaiS.-C.AyadE. (2016). A peer-mediated intervention to improve the conversational skills of high school students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.003
3.
BambaraL. M.ThomasA.ChovanesJ.ColeC. L. (2018). Peer-mediated intervention: Enhancing the social conversational skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918775057
4.
BarberaM. L.RasmussenT. (2007). The verbal behavior approach: How to teach children with autism and related disorders. Jessica Kingsley.
5.
BarnardJ.PriorA.PotterD. (2000). Inclusion and autism: Is it working? 1,000 examples of inclusion in education and adult life from the National Autistic Society’s members. National Autistic Society.
6.
CallN. A.ShillingsburgM. A.BowenC. N.ReavisA. R.FindleyA. J. (2013). Direct assessment of preferences for social interactions in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(4), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.69
7.
ChristT. J. (2007). Experimental control and threats to internal validity of concurrent and nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20237
8.
DeckersA.MurisP.RoelofsJ. (2017). Being on your own or feeling lonely? Loneliness and other social variables in youths with autism spectrum disorders. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(5), 828–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0707-7
9.
GaleC. M.EikesethS.KlintwallL. (2019). Children with autism show atypical preference for non-social stimuli. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46705-8
10.
HagopianL. P.BoelterE. W.JarmolowiczD. P. (2011). Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: Review and recommendations. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391770
11.
HaleC. M.Tager-FlusbergH. (2005). Social communication in children with autism: The relationship between theory of mind and discourse development. Autism, 9(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361305051395
12.
HanleyG. P.PiazzaC. C.FisherW. W.ContrucciS. A.MaglieriK. A. (1997). Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459
13.
HornerR. H.SwobodaC. M. (2014). Visual analysis of single-case intervention research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances. (pp. 91–125). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14376-004
14.
HughesC.KaplanL.BernsteinR.BoykinM.ReillyC.BrighamN.CosgriffJ.HeilingoetterJ.HarveyM. (2012). Increasing social interaction skills of secondary school students with autism and/or intellectual disability: A review of interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(4), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813805327214
15.
JesteS. S.GeschwindD. H. (2014). Disentangling the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder through genetic findings. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.278
16.
JonesC. D.SchwartzI. S. (2009). When asking questions is not enough: An observational study of social communication differences in high functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(3), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0642-y
17.
KasariC.Rotheram-FullerE.LockeJ.GulsrudA. (2012). Making the connection: Randomized controlled trial of social skills at school for children with autism spectrum disorders: Social skills intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(4), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02493.x
18.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
19.
KoegelL. K.ParkM. N.KoegelR. L. (2014). Using self-management to improve the reciprocal social conversation of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(5), 1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1956-y
20.
KoegelR.KimS.KoegelL.SchwartzmanB. (2013). Improving socialization for high school students with ASD by using their preferred interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2121–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1765-3
21.
KoegelR. L.FredeenR.KimS.DanialJ.RubinsteinD.KoegelL. (2012). Using perseverative interests to improve interactions between adolescents with autism and their typical peers in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300712437043
22.
KohlerF. W.StrainP. S.HoysonM.DavisL.DoninaW. M.RappN. (1995). Using a group-oriented contingency to increase social interactions between children with autism and their peers: A preliminary analysis of corollary supportive behaviors. Behavior Modification, 19(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455950191002
23.
LeachD.LaRocqueM. (2011). Increasing social reciprocity in young children with autism. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451209349531
24.
LefebvreD.StrainP. S. (1989). Effects of a group contingency on the frequency of social interactions among autistic and nonhandicapped preschool children: Making LRE efficacious. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381518901300405
25.
LevinJ. R.FerronJ. M.GafurovB. S. (2018). Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(5), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2016.1197708
26.
LitowL.PumoryD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341
27.
LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA.O’NeillK. (2015). Group contingency interventions with children: 1980–2010. A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 39(2), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514554393
28.
LockeJ.KasariC.Rotheram-FullerE.KretzmannM.JacobsJ. (2013). Social network changes over the school year among elementary school-aged children with and without an autism spectrum disorder. School Mental Health, 5(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-012-9092-y
29.
MacDuffG. S.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In MauriceC.GreenG.FoxxR. M. (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37–50). PRO-ED.
30.
PalmenA.DiddenR.ArtsM. (2008). Improving question asking in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of small-group training. Autism, 12(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361307085265
31.
PokorskiE. A.BartonE. E.LedfordJ. R. (2017). A review of the use of group contingencies in preschool settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(4), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416649935
32.
SmithS.BarajasK.EllisB.MooreC.McCauleyS.ReichowB. (2019). A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials of the good behavior game. Behavior Modification. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519878670
33.
SundbergM. L.PartingtonJ. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Behavior Analysts.
34.
SymesW.HumphreyN. (2010). Peer-group indicators of social inclusion among pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) in mainstream secondary schools: A comparative study. School Psychology International, 31(5), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034310382496
35.
TaylorB. A.HochH.PotterB.RodriguezA.SpinnatoD.KalaigianM. (2005). Manipulating establishing operations to promote initiations toward peers in children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.003
36.
WalkerG. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4
37.
Winborn-KemmererL.RingdahlJ. E.WackerD. P.KitsukawaK. (2009). A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185
38.
YuanC.HuaY.ZhuJ. (2019). The role of reinforcement in multiple response repetition error correction and treatment preference of Chinese children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(9), 3704–3715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04086-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
