The present study used a regression discontinuity approach to test whether schema-based instruction (SBI) was effective for students identified with varying levels of mathematics difficulties (MD) who received Tier-1 instruction. The performance of these students was compared to similar students who received business-as-usual Tier-1 instruction. Results indicated SBI on average raised scores regardless of whether a student was categorized as having MD on outcome measures of mathematics problem solving, suggesting that SBI is effective for a wide range of proportional reasoning skills and general mathematical proficiency, which broadens the population of students who could benefit from SBI. Standardized slopes for the treatment effect also provide evidence of the effectiveness of SBI. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshworthK. E.PullenP. C. (2015). Comparing regression discontinuity and multivariate analyses of variance: Examining the effects of a vocabulary intervention for students at risk for reading disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 131–144. doi:10.1177/0731948714555020
2.
AugustD.Branum-MartinL.Cárdenas-HaganE.FrancisD. J.PowellJ.MooreS.HaynesE. F. (2014). Helping ELLs meet the common core state standards for literacy in science: The impact of an instructional intervention focused on academic language. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 54–82. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.836763
3.
BaileyD. H.HoardM. K.NugentL.GearyD. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 447–455. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004
4.
BakerS. K.SmolkowskiK.ChaparroE. A.SmithJ. M.FienH. (2015). Using regression discontinuity to test the impact of a Tier 2 reading intervention in first grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8, 218–244. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.909548
5.
BloomH. (2010). Modern regression discontinuity analysis. New York, NY: MDRC.
6.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR.ScammaccaN.ChavezM. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of Tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32. doi:10.1177/0741932507309712
7.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR. M.ScammaccaN.FunkC.WinterA.. . . PoolC. (2008). The effects of Tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63. doi:10.2307/20528817
8.
DaneA. V.SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45. doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00043-3
9.
DosseyJ.McCroneS.HalvorsenK. (2016). Mathematics education in the United States 2016: A capsule summary book written for the thirteenth International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2006). A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621–626.
12.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
13.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 22.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
16.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.StarJ. R.RodriguezM. C. (2016). The effects of schema-based instruction on the proportional thinking of students with mathematics difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 354–367. doi:10.1177/0022219414554228
17.
JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.DupuisD. N.KarlS. R. (2017). A randomized trial of the effects of schema-based instruction on proportional problem-solving for students with mathematics problem-solving difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 322–336. doi:10.1177/0022219416629646
18.
JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.DupuisD. N.KarlS. R.LeinA. E.SimonsonG.SlaterS. C. (2015). Effects of a research-based intervention to improve seventh-grade students’ proportional problem solving: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1019–1034. doi:10.1037/edu0000039
19.
JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.ImS-h.KarlS. R.SlaterS. C. (2018). Improving student learning of ratio, proportion, and percent: A replication study of schema-based instruction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20.
JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.KarlS. R.SimonsonG. R.SlaterS. C. (2017). Investigating a Tier 1 intervention focused on proportional reasoning: A follow-up study. Exceptional Children, 83, 340–358. doi:10.1177/0014402917691017
21.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R.DupuisD. N.RodriguezM. C. (2013). Effectiveness of schema-based instruction for improving seventh-grade students’ proportional reasoning: A randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 114–136. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.725804
22.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R.RodriguezM. C.LindellM.SomekiF. (2011). Improving students’ proportional thinking using schema-based instruction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 731–745. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.002
23.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281–355. doi:10.3386/w14723
24.
LipseyM. W.PuzioK.YunC.HebertM. A.Steinka-FryK.ColeM. W.. . . BusickM. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (Publication No. NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/pdf/20133000.pdf
25.
MarshallS. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MayerR. E. (1999). The promise of educational psychology Vol. I: Learning in the content areas. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
27.
MeyerJ. P. (2011). jMetrik Version 2.1.0 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://itemanalysis.com
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). NAEP data explorer. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata
29.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
30.
Özgün-KocaS. A.AltayM. K. (2009). An investigation of proportional reasoning skills of middle school students. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 2, 26–48. doi:10.1080/24727466.2009.11790289
31.
Pearson. (2004). Group Mathematics Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation [GMADE] (Level M, Form A). San Antonio, TX: Author.
32.
RobinsonJ. P. (2010). The effects of test translation on young English learners’ mathematics performance. Educational Researcher, 39, 582–590. doi:10.3102/0013189x10389811
33.
RyooJ. H.PullenP. C. (2017). Regression discontinuity design for cross-sectional data, longitudinal data, and intervention research for special education. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.CullenP. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 137–150). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
34.
SchulteA. (2016). Prevention and response to intervention: Past, present, and future. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed., pp. 59–71). New York, NY: Springer Science.
35.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.. . . ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612440101
36.
SieglerR. S.FazioL. K.BaileyD. H.ZhouX. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 13–19. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004
37.
SmithM. S.SteinM. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
38.
SteinerP.CookT. D.ShadishW. R.ClarkM. H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15, 250–267. doi:10.1037/a0018719
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
41.
VaughnS.SwansonE. A. (2015). Special education research advances knowledge in education. Exceptional Children, 82, 11–24. doi:10.1177/0014402915598781
42.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: Author.
43.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA. K.. . . OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=16
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
