The purpose of this study was to examine the risk and protective factors of peer victimization among young children with disabilities. This study analyzed data from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (n =1,130) to test a path model that included child, family, and school characteristics at Year 1 and peer-relation difficulties and social skills at Year 2 to predict peer victimization among children with disabilities at Year 3. Children’s family and school factors had direct effects on children’s poorer social behaviors and language development, which had direct effects on peer-relation difficulties, which in turn increased peer victimization. Children’s prosocial skill development, facilitated by children’s receptive language ability, protects children with disabilities from peer victimization. Intervention implications are discussed.
BarkerE. D.BoivinM.BrendgenM.FontaineN.ArseneaultL.VitaroF. . . . TremblayR. E. (2008). Predictive validity and early predictors of peer-victimization trajectories in preschool. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 1185–1192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.65.10.1185
3.
BaumeisterA. L.StorchE. A.GeffkenG. R. (2008). Peer victimization in children with learning disabilities. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25, 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10560-007-0109-6
4.
BenbenishtyR.AstorR. A. (2005). School violence in context: Culture, neighborhood, family, school, and gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrunsteinK. A.MarroccoF.KleinmanM.SchonfeldI. S.GouldM. S. (2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 40–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18
8.
BryanA.SchmiegeS. J.BroaddusM. R. (2007). Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: Estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework. Aids and Behavior, 11, 365–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9150-2
9.
ByrneB. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
10.
CardN. A.HodgesE. V. (2008). Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 451–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012769
11.
CarlsonE.DaleyT.BittermanA.RileyJ.KellerB.JenkinsF.MarkowitzJ. (2008). Changes in the characteristics, services, and performance of preschoolers with disabilities from 2003–04 to 2004–05, wave 2 overview report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study. Rockville, MD: Westat.
12.
ChampionK.VernbergE.ShipmanK. (2003). Nonbullying victims of bullies: Aggression, social skills, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 535–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.08.003
13.
The Child Development Supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. (2010). The Panel Study of Income Dynamics child development supplement: User guide for CDS-II. Retrieved from http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/CDS/cdsii_userGd.pdf
14.
Conti-RamsdenG.BottingN. (2004). Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 145–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/013)
15.
DiamondK. E. (2002). The development of social competence in children with disabilities. In SmithP.HartC. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 570–587). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
17.
FekkesM.PijpersF. I. M.Verloove-VanhorickS. P. (2006). Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 638–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.6.638
18.
FoxC. L.BoultonM. J. (2005). The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 313–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905X25517
19.
FoxC. L.BoultonM. J. (2006a). Longitudinal associations between submissive/nonassertive social behavior and different types of peer victimization. Violence & Victims, 21, 383–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/vivi.21.3.338
20.
FoxC. L.BoultonM. J. (2006b). Friendship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills problems and peer victimisation. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 110–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20114
21.
GladstoneG. L.ParkerG. B.MalhiG. S. (2006). Do bullied children become anxious and depressed adults?: A cross-sectional investigation of the correlates of bullying and anxious depression. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 201–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000202491.99719c3
22.
GuralnickM. J. (2010). Early intervention approaches to enhance the peer-related social competence of young children with developmental delays: A historical perspective. Infants and Young Children, 23, 73–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3181d22e14
23.
GuralnickM. J.ConnorR. T.NevilleB.HammondM. A. (2006). Promoting the peer-related social development of young children with mild developmental delays: Effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 336–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[336:PTPSDO]2.0.CO;2
HemmeterM. L.FoxL.JackS.BroylesL. (2007). A program-wide model of positive behavior support in early childhood settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 337–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381510702900405
28.
HoglundW. L.LeadbeaterB. J. (2004). The effects of family, school, and classroom ecologies on changes in children’s social competence and emotional and behavioral problems in first grade. Developmental Psychology, 40, 533–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.533
29.
Khoury-KassabriM.BenbenishtyR.AstorR. A.ZeiraA. (2004). The contributions of community, family, and school variables to student victimization. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 187–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7414-4
30.
KnoxE.Conti-RamsdenG. (2003). Bullying risks of 11-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI): Does school placement matter?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820210152531
Kochenderfer-LaddB.LaddG. W.KochelK. P. (2009). A child and environment framework for studying risk for peer victimization. In HarrisM. J. (Eds.), Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 27–52). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
LeadbeaterB.HoglundW.WoodsT. (2003). Changing contexts? The effects of a primary prevention program on classroom levels of peer relational and physical victimization. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 397–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10057
34.
LucianoS.SavageR. S. (2007). Bullying risk in children with learning difficulties in inclusive educational settings. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22, 14–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0829573507301039
35.
MarkowitzJ.CarlsonE.FreyW.RileyJ.ShimshakA.HeinzenH. . . . KleinS. (2006). Preschoolers with disabilities: Characteristics, services, and results, wave 1 overview report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS). Rockville, MD: Westat.
36.
MartlewM.HodsonJ. (1991). Children with mild learning difficulties in an integrated and in a special school: Comparisons of behaviour, teasing, and teachers’ attitudes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 355–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00992.x
37.
MerrellK. W. (1998). Assessing social skills and peer relations. In VanceH. B. (Ed.), Psychological assessment of children: Best practices for school and clinical settings (pp. 246–276). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
MerrellK. W. (2002). Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales, Second Edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED
39.
MerrellK. W. (2008). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children & adolescents (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
MunroB. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Willkins.
41.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanJ. W.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association. 285, 2094–2100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094
42.
NorwichB.KellyN. (2004). Pupils’ views on inclusion: Moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 43–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920310001629965
43.
OdomS. L.ZercherC.LiS. M.MarquartJ. M.SandallS.BrownW. H. (2006). Social acceptance and rejection of preschool children with disabilities: A mixed-method analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 807–823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.807
44.
OlweusD. (1984). Aggressors and their victims: Bullying at school. In FrudeN.GaultH. (Eds.), Disruptive behavior in schools (pp. 57–76). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
ReijntjesA.KamphuisJ. H.PrinzieP.TelchM. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009
47.
ReiterS.Lapidot-LeflerN. (2007). Bullying among special education students with intellectual disabilities: Differences in social adjustment and social skills. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 174–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/19349556(2007)45[174:Basesw]2.0.Co;2
48.
RoseC. A.EspelageD. L.Monda-AmayaL. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: A comparative analysis. Educational Psychology, 29, 761–776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410903254864Pii915676495
49.
RoseC. A.Monda-AmayaL. E.EspelageD. L. (2010). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361247
50.
ScholteR. H. J.EngelsR. C. M. E.OverbeekG.de KempR. A. T.HaselagerG. J. T. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9074-3
51.
SonE.ParishS. L.PetersonN. A. (2012). National prevalence of peer victimization among young children with disabilities in the United States. Children and Youth Service Review, 34, 1540–1545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.014
52.
SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L.VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2010). What can be done about school bullying?: Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39, 38–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357622
53.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Children with disabilities receiving special education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org
54.
ValliantR. (1993). Poststratification and conditional variance-estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2290701
WangJ.IannottiR. J.NanselT. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
57.
WienerJ.MakM. (2009). Peer victimization in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in Schools, 46, 116–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20358
58.
WoodsS.WolkeD.NowickiS.HallL. (2009). Emotion recognition abilities and empathy of victims of bullying. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 307–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.11.002
59.
YoungJ.Ne’emanA.GelserS. (2011). Bullying and students with disabilities. Washington, DC: The National Council on Disability. Retrieved from http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2011/March920
